Ten Things Congress Did Instead of Getting Us Out of Iraq



The “Brains” Thomas Nast Political Cartoon

March 20, 2003 Through the Present

Michael Collins
Scoop Independent News
Washington, D.C.

1. Well, to start, Congress gave Alaska Senator Ted Stevens (R) $1.5 billion dollars to build two bridges to absolutely nowhere. After two years, the citizens of Alaska stopped one of them and Sen. Stevens is now subject of an FBI investigation targeting public corruption. (1) (2)

2. Right in the middle of this major war, Congress decided to give away hundreds of billions in tax cuts to major corporations. Isn’t war supposed to be a time of sacrifice? Guess the big guys are too busy making money to sacrifice. (1) (2)

3. Speaking of sacrifice, Congress continued its special retirement system where just five years of service gets you full retirement with benefits at age 62. Sweet! Where can we get that deal? (1)

4. One day Congress was feeling so powerful it decided to trash the great protection against unlawful imprisonment, the writ of habeas corpus. This dates back 800 years to the Magna Carta. You can now be arrested without a charge, denied a lawyer, and held indefinitely. They said it’s just for terrorists but they lied. As a special bonus, those torture techniques for terrorists can also be used on U.S. citizens. More of that globalism business. Taser alert! (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

5. But let’s be fair, the U.S. Senate did take a firm stand on Iraq just recently. They took the time to vote 72 to 25 to condemn an anti war group for criticizing the testimony of one of the few generals who actually supports the war. At the same time they gave billions more to continue in Iraq. Attack an ad, fund a war. It’s Congress in action. (1) (2)

6. As if nuking a newspaper ad wasn’t enough, Congress gave recently embarrassed Sen. Vitter, (R-LA), a big fat check for his pet project – “a Louisiana Christian group that has challenged the teaching of Darwinian evolution in the public school system and to which he has political ties.” (1) (2)

7. Meanwhile, Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) got a 56 vote Senate majority to guarantee U.S. troops sufficient rest and leave to recover from the hardships of the Iraq war. But it needed 60 votes to pass! “It’s a congressional thing, we wouldn’t understand.” (1) (2) (3)

8. Congress made sure that seniors continue to pay top dollar for their medicine by refusing, that’s right, refusing to let Medicare officials negotiate bulk discounts from big drug companies (Big Pharma). Why wouldn’t they want seniors to get up to 60% off for vital medicines? Got me. (1) (2)

9. Congress might be getting a little worried about us, the citizens. They passed a bill allowing the government to spy on our phone conversations and emails without a warrant “just because they say so.” All it takes is the Attorney General and one intelligence official to say so and you’re bugged. You’ll never know it. They wouldn’t want to upset us, would they? (1) (2) (3) (4)

10. Not satisfied with screwing the seniors, the soldiers, and just about all U.S. citizens, Congress is now out to get the world by blocking any real action on global warming. Congress must be smarter than just about every scientist in the world. They’re the “Brains.” (1) (2) (3) (4)

Congress had time to do all this…

...but they didn’t have time to get us the Hell out of Iraq.

Let’s not forget!

End

Permission to reprint in whole or part with a link the this article in Scoop and attribution of authorship


Michael Collins September 24, 2007 - 11:07pm
( categories: Iraq | Opinion )

but how do the links for point 10 support the contention that Congress is "now out to get the world by blocking any real action on global warming"?

I don't see any reference to stonewalling or other actions by Congress there.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja September 24, 2007 - 7:45pm

I thought about that one after I wrote it but when I paused for a moment, the rationale was very clear. Global warming is the most critical problem we face since the end game is an earth that's simply not viable. Fortunately, we have the science and the observable manifestations to know that right now is the time to start acting. Every other problem is subordinate to this problem. Yet in what they like to refer to as "the world's greatest deliberative body," they take tepid, half ass stands and fiddle while the Earth burns. The arrogance and stupidity of this neglect imperils everything.

Yet they'll take time to condemn MoveOn (I'm no big fan) and obsessively reduce our individual protections against the meddling state. This president is perhaps the worst leader in the world's history considering the stakes. The Congress is equaling his incompetence.

There is a price certain but no action on the horizon. How about that Florida animation - 1 meter, 3 feet, it's coming and what do they do, absolutely nothing.

They should all be ashamed. We'd be better ruled by a Congress chosen randomly by a representative sample of the general population and insulated from legalized bribery. I lay down some serious money on that bet.

That's sort of what I was getting at;)

Michael Collins September 24, 2007 - 11:46pm

Particularly better ruled by a Congress chosen randomly by a representative sample of the general population and insulated from legalized bribery. That'd be a nice change.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja September 25, 2007 - 6:49am

that the Republican 108th-109th Congresses of 2003 - 2006 had no intention of "getting us out of Iraq". How 'bout writing a piece on what the Democratic 110th Congress has chosen to work on despite its widely recognized mandate to end the war?



Turn back to the Constitution - and
READ it.

Rick September 24, 2007 - 9:31pm

It won't be nearly as kind. However, let me suggest this. Think of our ruling party as "The Money Party," with a Republican and Democratic wing. To join all you have to do is whore yourself out to the highest bidders, overt and covert, serve their needs, and invent some half cocked social theory to explain why the poor stay poor, the sick stay sick, and the problems seem just "so complex" and always "take so much time to solve."

It's all a giant scam greased by legalized bribery. Listen to these clowns squeal when some one says "public funding for campaigns." It's the cost, the government. That's totally threatening. Of course, public funding would have to be accompanied by believable elections.
"We pretend to vote, they pretend to get elected" is the true motto of our election system.

As a result, I chose to start when the war started. The Money Party had their assets arrayed, especially Ms. Miller of the NYT and the unforgivable nihilists at the Washington Post. They're key stakeholders in The Monday Party and also publicists.

Looking at it this way makes partisan divides blur, e.g., those Senate votes on tax cuts, bankruptcy, etc. that are always about 73-27. I do plan to zero in on this Congress though. You're right; they deserve special attention given the stakes. These are not "big game" players.

Michael Collins September 24, 2007 - 11:59pm

although the point about them having no intention of getting us out is valid. /rubs hands/ i can't wait to read your less kindly piece on the 110th. heh. it's so much more fun when for us as writers when there is reason to apply both polemic and factual analysis. hypocrisy is nifty like that.

chicago dyke September 25, 2007 - 8:03am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.