The Index of Suspicion: CIA plane and drugs in Mexico


Back when I was in training to do ultrasound, we used the medical term, the "index of suspicion." The idea is simple. If an overweight 40 or so woman has right upper quadrant pain, the index of suspicion is raised for gall bladder disease. My job was to to settle the question by looking for gallstones.

Right now, I am listening to Worldview (WBEZ-Chicago Public Radio). Worldview is doing a multi-day series entitled The Geopolitics of Drugs. Today is the last day of the series. Listen to the Geopolitics of Drugs: Drug War Whistleblower. In it you will hear about a plane that was used in the CIA rendition program in the GWOT to crashing in a Mexican jungle--full of drugs.

Once you're done, tell me if your index of suspicion does not go up on things that only loony tinfoil hat types would entertain. The basic theme is that international drug trafficking, its alleged connections to the military and the CIA and its importance to our financial system, is currently huge. Here's the kind of stuff I am talking about: Daniel Hopsicker's Mad Cow Morning News e.g. here, the defunct From the Wilderness, and from Catherine Austin Fitts, a onetime big financial player.

I must confess that I have hauled out the 'ol tinfoil hat and turned up the gain on the antennae. I wished I had the equivalent of my old ultrasound machine to rule out this stuff. "Nope. No gallstones. Negative ultrasound." But the accumulated weight of the evidence beginning with what appears to me to be a thoroughly corrupted government no longer makes that an easy task.


LJ October 29, 2007 - 1:15pm

Have you looked into her story? There is a thread posted today over on DailyKos which highlights some recent information. She apparently can corroborate what you have posted here.

jtruett October 29, 2007 - 2:22pm

I can't seem to find shit these days. If you can provide a link, that would be great.

LJ October 29, 2007 - 3:07pm

Link to Bradblog here

jtruett October 29, 2007 - 2:55pm

Here she does a thought experiment on two businessmen with two different boatloads of a white substance: sugar and drugs. The first makes maybe 5% to 10% margins (Slim Margins) and other does 20% to 30% (Slim Margins).

Look at your estimate of Sam and Dave's sales and profits. Now answer for yourself the following questions.

Who is going to get laid more, Sam or Dave?

Who is going to be more popular with the local bankers, Sam or Dave?

Who is going to have a bigger stock market portfolio with a large investment house, Sam or Dave?

Who is going to donate more money to political campaigns, Sam or Dave?

Whose wife is going to be bigger in the local charities, Sam or Dave's?

Whose companies will have more prestigous law firms on retainer, Sam or Dave's?

Who is going to buy the other's company first, Sam or Dave? Is Dave the drug man going to buy Sam the sugar man's company, or is Sam the sugar man going to buy Dave the drug man's company?

When they want to buy the other's company, will the bankers, lawyers and investment houses and politicians back Sam the sugar man or Dave the drug man?

Whose son or grandson has a better chance of getting into Harvard or getting a job offer at Goldman Sachs, Sam or Dave's?

snip...

Let's take the BIG PERCENT margin that we estimated for Dave the drug man's net cash margin. Let's say that every year from 1947 through 2001, that the cash flow sales available for reinvestment from drug profits grew by $3 billion a year, throwing off that number times BIG PERCENT. Okay, assume that the reinvested profit grew at the compound growth rate of the Standard & Poor's 500 as it got reinvested along the way.

That amount is an estimate for the equity owned and controlled by those who have profited in the drug trade. Total narco dollars. How much money is that? I made an Excel spread-sheet once to estimate total narco capital in the economy.

My numbers showed` that Dave the drug man had bought up not only Sam's companies, but ---if you throw in other organized crime cash flows----a controlling position in about most everything on the New York Stock Exchange.

When you think about it, this analysis make sense. The folks with the BIG PERCENT --- big cash margin ---- would end up rich and in power and the guys working their you-know-what off for SLIM PERCENT --- a low cash margin --- would end up working for them.

and from here

In late June 1999, numerous news services, including Associated Press, reported that Richard Grasso, Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange flew to Colombia to meet with a spokesperson for Raul Reyes of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC), the supposed "narco terrorists" with whom we are now at war.

The purpose of the trip was "to bring a message of cooperation from U.S. financial services" and to discuss foreign investment and the future role of U.S. businesses in Colombia.

Some reading in between the lines said to me that Grasso's mission related to the continued circulation of cocaine capital through the US financial system. FARC, the Colombian rebels, were circulating their profits back into local development without the assistance of the American banking and investment system. Worse yet for the outlook for the US stock market's strength from $500 billion - $1 trillion in annual money laundering - FARC was calling for the decriminalization of cocaine.

To understand the threat of decriminalization of the drug trade, just go back to your Sam and Dave estimate and recalculate the numbers given what decriminalization does to drive BIG PERCENT back to SLIM PERCENT and what that means to Wall Street and Washington's cash flows. No narco dollars, no reinvestment into the stock markets, no campaign contributions.

It was only a few days after Grasso's trip that BBC News reported a General Accounting Office (GAO) report to Congress as saying: "Colombia's cocaine and heroin production is set to rise by as much as 50 percent as the U.S. backed drug war flounders, due largely to the growing strength of Marxist rebels"

I deduced from this incident that the liquidity of the NY Stock Exchange was sufficiently dependent on high margin cocaine profits (BIG PERCENT) that the Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange was willing for Associated Press to acknowledge he is making "cold calls" in rebel controlled peace zones in Colombian villages. "Cold calls" is what we used to call new business visits we would pay to people we had not yet done business with when I was on Wall Street.

LJ October 29, 2007 - 3:59pm

In his hey-day Amado Carrillo Fuentes is said to have moved $200 million in cash a week across the bridge between El Paso and Juarez.

Not once, but once a week, every week.

$200 million dollars in twenty dollar bills weighs 22,000 pounds. Half a fucking semi load.

Now when I read that the richest man in the world is no longer Bill Gates, but Carlos Slim, from Mexico...

Another thing I have mentioned before, but always seems to fall on deaf ears...

Where are you going to spend $200 million? In a week? And what good is it if you have it all piled in some room?

Every stinking dollar spent on dope gets back into circulation through legal channels and the powers that be goddamned good and well know about it.

I did inhale.

Don October 29, 2007 - 5:00pm

vis a vis drugs and suspicion: 'Drug wars - financial confiscation'
first Griebling reference

http://www.ctcintl.com/Columbia%20Years%20Freefall.shtml

I knew Bob Griebling (mentioned in the above link) well. His family and ours go way way back. My father, Hart Fellows Farwell, was very involved and instrumental in South American aviation matters since the 1920's. As a young man born of an telephone-oriented family (we created and sold phone companies to the fledgling AT&T) he grew to be interested in the then cutting edge of radio and so joined the Army Air Corps as a radioman which led him initially to a post in Panama. After he left the Army, he remained in South America and involved himself in aviation, first by building mountaintop radio shacks and radios (all by hand) for Juan Trippe and so building Pan Am. He later worked in Colombia with SAM airlines. In the early 1970's he established the Miami base of TAMPA airlines, a Colombian cargo airline created by Louis Coulsen. In the intervening years he had been involved in many ways with both South American and Carribbean aviation. And some CIA activities thereof. In 1970 we owned our own aircraft, starting first with a DC-4 and working up to a DC-7. We were approached many times by the cartels to haul drugs and rebuffed them. I believed his '50s covert history had led to that, among many other factors. It's a complex war indeed.

'86-88 I worked for TAMPA myself. I had a bonded import warehouse door in my office. The feds polygraphed me extensively pursuant to my getting that position, as there was nothing between me and the TAMPA 727s on the tarmac just arrived from Colombia -and I do mean 'just' arrived. We had extensive investment in security and screening (x-ray) and my door preceded those areas, leaving my office in a significant position. I told them everything of course. My entire history and beliefs. All they cared about though was my honesty, not the mitigating details. As a confessed and confessedly dedicated cannabis user and proponent, I was quite surprised. The airline owners knew my father and his own history well, and his integrity, so my surprise faded quickly. I assumed they had their own input then with Customs if not the other agencies as well. During my time there, we were hit many times, a 5 million dollar fine each time. I do not know if they ever found the insider culprit but my office was never ever approached or contacted or questioned on any of those occasions.

Rex Wheeler was the head of security there. I noted the autographed framed picture on his wall -of George Bush. I noted the confusing mystery of it all even though privy to much private documentary activity, even officially as I was the consulate courier among other duties. Ostensibly TAMPA, like dear ol Dad, was on the side of the good guys. I still believe that, but do know there were those within not playing by the rules or on 'our' side. These were the Iran-Contra era circumstances...

I'll tell you now, there is for me no index of suspicion. The CIA is in the drug business completely. -Down there. All of us in Cockroach Corner at Miami International Airport knew who Southern Air Transport was. That may have blown their 'cover' but they could not so quickly suspend activity. Their activity was twofold and quite contradictatory. Interdiction *and* facilitation. In short, manage those who were allowed and disallow those who were unmanaged. Not just any pirate could run drugs. Who was to decide? That was the prize and question.

Any young jet wrench could get work in South America. The connections were not obscure. Chris Winn, a childhood buddy, is still buried beside a dirt runway down there in a plane filled with drugs. It was overloaded and had cartwheeled on takeoff. He was like 21 at the time.

I am from Miami, and my siblings are from Peru and Colombia. We were strongly strongly raised to not be 'Ugly Americans'. My father saw American Government duplicity in Panama in the 20's. ('Goofy' reefer smoking Air Corpsmen too for that matter...) He was a man of the world and disdained class having come from a heartless upper echelon of it. He wanted me to respect everybody, even dirt farmers, or 'peasants' as others may call such.

http://zuma.livejournal.com/124238.html

He'd have no index of suspicion either.

What did he do for the CIA? Run gas for Castro. Xmas, 1959, he landed a twin beech on the northern coast of Cuba, filled with gas barrels.

Ten years later he flew another twin beech, again solo, to Hawaii and received an Air Force escort coming in, ostensibly because he was supposedly short on fuel. Nonsense. He reported in the paper he was nowhere near such. Myself, I've always believed the escort action was almost a sort of honor guard.

I never saw the Mel Gibson movie Air America. Mel is to me troubling. But I am quite sure that movie doesn't tell the real tale no matter how superficially it does or does not treat the source material. Perhaps I should watch it just for the planes... (And Robert Downey, Jr.)

The Drug War is meant to make money, lots of it, in more ways than one. And believe you me, it does. Reefer endangers the NWO Dom culture like nothing else. They *must* be jailed. More so than all violent crimes combined. It threatens militaryism and military culture and industry. The gubmint cannot leave drug trafficking in anybody else's hands. No way. At effing all.

Nixon's bundling of head drugs with body drugs in the drug scheduling act was and remains beyond horrific. I maintain there's a head to all drugs, and alcohol's is the most controlling, most damaging, most horrific, most Dom culture engendering.

Zuma October 29, 2007 - 9:25pm

'He who controls the Spice controls the Universe' -Frank Herbert in Dune

http://zuma.theprawn.com/planetplantplan.png

Zuma October 29, 2007 - 9:56pm

For me, the "index of suspicion" set up is not so much that the Gubmint is making money off of drugs. Instead, it is around the degree. Does it amount to skimming a few hundred million or are we talking hundreds of billions. How dependent on the money are we? Does The System need it? I mean genuine need to keep the whole thing going.

Does money from drugs go into government run hedge funds to manipulate the markets? Is somebody pushing a "buy button?" Will they decide that our national security is at stake? Or has this already been decided? Since 9/11 changed everything, can we "afford" to let the market set the price of stock indices without "guidance?" Therein lies the crux of my index of suspicion.

Hold on. The antennae on my tinfoil hat are vibrating. I'm getting another message. Gotta go.

Dom culture = dominant culture? What is "NWO"?

LJ October 29, 2007 - 10:02pm

I don't know the degree. I am quite sure it is more than your proffered least, but whether approaching your outer roughguesstimate, I have no reference for even guessing. I would believe we are somewhat dependent but not captively, inescapably so. That would be relinquishing aspects of control, of domination. Does the government need it? It damn well 'needs' control everything, that's for sure, most especially where South America and the Caribbean are involved. Like Iran-Contra, I believe the money funds black government and black ops and as such is a large part of the black budget. I disagree 911 changed everything but rather was part of everything. I certainly don't believe at all it came as a surprise. Up the gain a tad more.

Dom culture = dominator culture, yes. Alcohol's partly responsible and in proactive terms, largely so. Otherwise, the missing ameliorating and thus mitigating effects of Entheogens in our native cultures left a void that it filled in contrast. Thank god (literally) they are making a slowly fulsome return to acceptance in our full world.

The New World Order is about furthering American hegemony in the Americas and globally, with South America as the pivotal question hence the significance of the activity there now. Alex Jones (http://infowars.com) overuses the term to death but I don't think it originated with him. I believe it's used other places differently but mostly refers to the PNAC (Project for a New American Century) crowd. I believe the planned highway from Canada through Mexico is preparation for it, what with it's vast tunnels and all.

Drug consumption is as necessary to the NWO as any other consumption.
Shop til you drop. That was Bush's prescription to 911 woes. It is confusing as hell that they act to keep illicit reefer use ongoing and then jailing such users when such use endangers them spiritually and intellectually but such myopia is typical of hubris. But then again, yeah, it makes them money coming and going. Tons.

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Personal Gratification: "Here There Be Monsters"

http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?lg=en&reference=3190

Evo Morales, President of Bolivia, Addresses the 2007 World Social Forum in Nairobi

http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?lg=en&reference=1960

See Amy Goodman's interview with Morales. He's quite a guy. For now. I fear power corrupting him. He was literally shoved into power and his honeymoon period of innocence may still be ongoing. But he and the less innocent Chavez have a strong start on broad resistance to corrosive forces both within and without. Oil figures prominently, but drugs as much I believe. S.A. is beyond merely important -it's ultimately critical. Spice, doncha know, heh. But seriously that and more. Amazonia is still beyond our concept in what it holds. I believe Ayahuasca's nature totally freaks them out as a befuddling phenomenon of information 'storage' and conveyance and certainly experientially, but fortunately it takes ancient cultural knowledge and skill to produce and experience such communal information phenomenon. And we still do not know all else what Amazonia holds. The pharmaceutical companies want and need it badly.

The CIA's involvement as discussed here is nothing but their toehold to a vast future of subjugation over this veritable mouth of the Earth that speaks to us suchly, botanically. It's more key than anything, even oil.

Zuma October 29, 2007 - 11:26pm

This may be a large door to link madness but here tis:

you can understand...

to get to the tlaxcala and borev links i had to search back to this old post here.

Zuma October 29, 2007 - 11:57pm

Ten years later he flew another twin beech, again solo, to Hawaii and received an Air Force escort coming in, ostensibly because he was supposedly short on fuel. Nonsense. He reported in the paper he was nowhere near such. Myself, I've always believed the escort action was almost a sort of honor guard.

Given that the range of a Beech D-18 is 1200 miles and the distance between the US mainland and Hawaii is 2500 miles.


“I despise ideologues masquerading as objective journalists.” - Bill O'Reilly, March 30, 2007

Mark October 31, 2007 - 9:11pm

...for gasoline.



skyway logo visible on plane

In the 70's I carried 19 gallons of gas in my Karmann Ghias too.
8 of which were in the front trunk in a bladder tank he gave me for Xmas.
He was really this incredibly neat guy. Who loved loved loved to travel long distances independently. And I loved traveling with him. I'd talk his ear off, poor guy. My captive audience, heh. In the twin beeches of course he couldn't hear me as I babbled happily. Neither of us minded.

While I'm here:
I forgot I had this MP3 by Allen Ginsberg on CIA drug smuggling.
I'd come back to this post to add it.
CIA-Dope-GinsbergJan72.mp3

Zuma November 1, 2007 - 8:17am

After posting that comment, I suspected there was an explanation that the plane was carrying a ton of extra fuel.


“I despise ideologues masquerading as objective journalists.” - Bill O'Reilly, March 30, 2007

Mark November 3, 2007 - 8:40pm

I'm a detail freak and a wordy cuss who tries to be brief and often blow it coming and going.

The thing is, his particular generation, born at the beginning of a century distinctly different from those before, learned and discovered and saw many revolutionary things in an accelerated progression that was really overwhelming and the lag time of absorbing it all grew and grew faster and he saw that. He was among the army pilots seeing from the air the huge Nazca line drawings years before their offical discovery. Things like that gave him a enlargened perspective early on. He pointedly turned his back on the [AT&T] aristocracy he was born into, *and* an Air Corps career, to stay down there and build. Ultimately it all turned to shit over the decades and he then wished, despise his strongly humble nature, he'd remained in the Air Corps and added a wise influence. He had a global view, in terms of land, distances, and people, and a unique perspective on the 20th Century, and a context greater than commerce or transnational theft -all this gave him an overview that is his ultimate legacy. All I can do is try to convey it. I think it was all an overwhelming understanding for him, causing him endless pause for thought, and action.

Before he died, he saw the advent of computers, networked computers. With that, he saw the world able to continue forward as he thought it ought. Despite Future Shock.

I just quit working (for the second time) at Runway Cafe' beneath Wiley Post Aiport's control tower. I believe he ate there in 1966 going out and back to Oakland. Just before he died in 1995, I asked where he'd rather have lived than Miami, Fl. if snow was no issue and he said, "Oklahoma City". My jaw dropped. -I've been here 7 years now. His ghost is all over this place and the small town of Bethany w/in OKC. Especially that little airport, with it's EAA (homebuilt aircraft) chapter and Warbirds chapter. I guess I'm home now. If the country is gonna crumble beneath us, this is a better place to be than Miami. And I need to be locally active.

http://www.okimc.org/ (dead server?? wha?)

http://acorn.org/index.php?id=9431

(These are two good networks for most anyone to start locally with.)

Everyone makes a difference he taught. 'Follow your nose' was his agenda.

I shot this Velocity at work a few years ago. As if keeping his interests, and thus him, somehow alive in this world... (Not long after, Dennis Kucinich was there, in Runway Cafe's sideyard, speaking. I'd a chance to speak with him, ask him anything I wanted, but I went on in back to work instead. I wish I'd talked to him, just because.)

eom

Zuma November 4, 2007 - 1:18am

to the` series sporadically while in he car. I must say, I've been shocked by the admitted complicity of the CIA by the guests they've interviewed.
thanks for diarying this

dk October 29, 2007 - 9:40pm

any more. I have read this kind of stuff before but have repressed it. But the one physical fact that undoes the "conspiracy theorist" charge is the plane with the N serial number that has both been a part of the GWOT and running drugs. Once you have the physical evidence, it is hard to make the story go away. It kinda writes itself.

LJ October 29, 2007 - 10:07pm

ahh the drug war, i swear it made the world seem completely insane to accept the pointless endless war.i could not understand how i ,as a naive high school kid, could plainly see the contradictions and insane actions in the drug war and that its stated mission would only be possible when the war stopped its self perpetuating insanity.

luckily my later years introduced me to some very cool people who are friends of my brother, shout out to the Vancouver Island Compassion Society

Warvigilent October 29, 2007 - 10:10pm
Tina October 30, 2007 - 3:45am

my comment above ('you can understand...') holds a link that holds a link that may hold what you're looking for here, to wit:

The operator of the Gulfstream is Donna Blue Aircraft, Inc. of Coconut Creek, Florida. Its address, according to the Florida Division of Corporations, is 4811 Lyons Technology, Coconut Creek, Florida 33073.

On June 10, 2006, WMR reported that the N987SA Grumman G-1159, Gulfstream II, was operated by S/A Holdings LLC and had been involved in the renditioning of prisoners to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

---

...I hope this helps.

Zuma October 30, 2007 - 6:04am

Michael Palmer, a former Delta pilot owned a company in Florida called Vortex. He flew weapons to the Contras in Central America, hopped to Colombia, loaded marijuana and cocaine, flew to Mexico and offloaded. He got paid at every stop along the way, from the CIA, from drug barons, and finally from the DEA.

I was around to witness a DC-6 loaded with marijuana and cocaine land near the tiny town of San Miguel, Coahuila, just below the Big Bend National Park.

Palmer's story is a matter of record (or a well laundered piece of it anyway); he testified before a Senate comittee headed by John Kerry.

While in prison I met Neil Hanson, one of the Air America pilots on which the movie was based. Unlike the movie, his story was not something people wanted to hear and upon hearing, most Americans refuse to believe it.

Stories of plane loads of heroin landing on military bases, etc.

And then of course there's Gary Webb's book Dark Alliance.

Check out this recent review of Webb's book written by a man claiming to have been a CIA agent in Central America:

Explosive?. No. It should be but no one gives a shit about this stuff.

I did inhale.

Don October 30, 2007 - 7:50am

Thank you.

Thank you for that Amazon link. I did not know about Webb or his book. I am more glad to know of it than I can express. I also greatly appreciate the things you yourself experienced, witnessed and conveyed and thank you for that as well.

That first review, with the numbered dozen-plus points, was more worthy in weight than all the others and I'm glad it was there to speak that much more clearly and informedly about the book and it's subject matter than the others.

But then, everything on the internet is fake, right?

Zuma October 30, 2007 - 11:18am

Zuma
If you have time read the book, I was in Calif during this time and saw C go from 32K a kilo to 16 same stuff it took a few weeks of ask quitly asking around found the answer. I was just meeting the guys in Oakland that created Crack and with that and the answer I stepped away forever. I know it was only a matter of time when they lost the H of Nam they would head to SA. I almost took a job with Air A but another short talk with some one and I never called them back, they were at every AG base looking any one that would join them. Check the movie, I waited until a few years ago to watch it and did bring memories Helio Carriers and Flying Box Cars both of witch I worked on.
jo6pac

jo6pac October 30, 2007 - 9:37pm

the guys who created crack? I mean, were they chemists? How did they get the idea? Stuff like that.

I sure lived a shelter life. This stuff is just blowing me away.

LJ October 30, 2007 - 10:14pm

No, just 4 youngs guys that fell into it,you searched this out you might find them. 2 are died, 1 in prison for life and 1 helps kids in Oakland, Calif. That was years ago that I read it in San Franisco C. Read Webbs book and this http://www.dunwalke.com/ This sure answered some other questions I had.

Thanks to the writer (tin foil hat won't help)and owner of the site.

jo6pac

jo6pac October 30, 2007 - 11:41pm

That was a helluva read, and a helluva link.
Wow.

Just like Blackwater profits from any war they're contracted to and so are behooved not to 'win' the war and end it's protraction, so too are the prisons behooved not to be less empty but more so, as they make money. This is one of many notions remaining with me from this past week. Certainly only a small aspect of all she said. I never did find crack and it's origin mentioned though, but no matter.

A stunning site, with much to take in. I whiffread some of it, and more closely much, but still I need to return there and will. Just wow.

Zuma October 31, 2007 - 2:19am

is how far she takes it. She is into the New World Order narrative full bore--everything. Depopulation, poisoning the masses, slavery, chem trails, concentration camps, --the full meal deal. When you start down the rabbit hole, you don't know how far it goes.

Having said that, I actually went to hear her speak. I was very impressed. She barely mentioned the New World Order. "Just don't give it your energy." Her whole focus is helping people to build their own local economies. She reverse engineers her considerable financial background to help money stay local instead of going to the Tapeworm--her term for the global economy. Don't feed the Tapeworm. Invest locally with people you know in ventures that feed, cloth and house people. She certainly is apocalyptic; but she is also very down to earth. She is a very interesting person.

LJ October 31, 2007 - 11:49am

'Just don't give it your energy' was a good thing for me to read.
I too buy the full meal deal of the NWO narrative. Whatever else, it can be a toxic, bilious meal. Thanks, muchly appreciated directly useful words.

http://www.dunwalke.com/18_Through_the_Via_Dolorosa.htm

"Seeing the New World Order as they are accelerates their failure, particularly as it inspires withdrawing our resources from their control and shifting investment to alternatives to govern our global resources on a responsible, wealth creating basis. That is why we gather power for life as we withdraw from people, organizations and efforts that are not authentic and shift our social affirmation, our time and attention, our currency and deposits, and our investments and our donations to authentic people, enterprises and decentralizing solutions."

This, and much of her local reinvestment words kept bringing Farmer John Peterson and his co-op to my mind.

Zuma October 31, 2007 - 6:25pm

I am not ready to buy into the NWO stuff. I am watching Alex Jones' Endgame movie. The very nature of the narrative in which a Jewish cabal, which has been secretly in control of the world for hundreds of years and is now about to carry out its agenda is not convincing to say the least.

OK, a little waterboarding could "convince" me. For me, it is hard enough to give assent to what is said about the corruption of drugs in this country.

But from a class relations standpoint, one can come to similar but not as extreme conclusions. As they continue to build up "our" plutocracy and follow the logic of that kind of social organization, things will not go well for the rest of us.

Her lecture was very powerful in that I could see how the world is arranged to transfer wealth out of localities to financial centers. It certainly breaks down the localities, but then, we will have football to watch on the plasma screen TV's.

Regarding Farmer John, a great movie, but at the end of the movie he still is a "goofball" in the midst of the "sane." Fitts is advocating building whole localities out of Farmer John that are as self-sufficient as possible. She is an amazing person.

LJ October 31, 2007 - 7:59pm

Yes, goofy, but that's not why I brought him up, the co--op aspect is why, as it was that that saved the farm.
And yes, taken a step larger logically follows.

Zuma November 1, 2007 - 8:22am

In the early 1980's something like that definitely happened -suddenly it was indeed much cheaper and ubiquitous. And then, near as suddenly and just as noticeably, freebasing arose and became trendy. And then maybe a year or two later, or so it seemed if I recall right, 'crack' arose. I figured it was simply easier to ship that way (...as if it *was* shipped that way -what did I know) compared to regular powder coke. That brief period of popularity for freebasing was always symbolized to me by the incident where Richard Pryor caught his hair on fire, ostensibly from the volatile substance catching fire in his pipe. Of course, coke as a powder never went away, quite the opposite, so suddenly it wasn't just cheaper but available in more forms. Confusing. Chic powder vs. declasse' crack: classism.
The middle class took of both worlds. Talk about marketing, whew.

I never saw H or knew any users or even heard of any coming up from S.A. I know some poppies grew down there but I thought it more majorly a Mexican product in terms of the Americas, and inferior to what crossed the Atlantic in any case. I was running the streets like mad for years in Miami and like I say, never saw any, which always made me think some of that weed as gateway drug argument (in terms of black market exposure and availability) to be baloney.

I'm sorry weed and coke ever got so commingled in trafficking and in proscription, and in the counter culture as reflected in High Times magazine's relatively long period of seemingly commingling the two culturally.

The economics of trafficking are weird. Weed's bulky and cheap yet will never be legalised anyway I believe due to that gateway drug perception so 'artificially' enhanced by their practical association by being trafficked by the same people. -I believe less people would use coke if weed hadn't taught them about patronising the black market and how to 'score', etc. I may be idealistic, but I think the distinction between hard and soft drugs (or body and head drugs) would be greater if weed was legal and so lessen hard drug use.
Gateway is an ironic term.

When they began trash-compacting weed for trafficking purposes, spurred I believed by the contrast in trafficking relatively compact powders, I expected a larger market resentment and backlash. It happened in reverse over the years on a larger scale. Curiously, home growing wasn't as comparatively tolerated as expected and grow rooms, in homes, were actively sought by their heat signatures. Rooms. Not fields. If they wouldn't legalise it, at least let domestic production be relatively and comparatively tolerated, eh? But noooo. That's uncontrolled privateering.

Y'know, that huge tunnel planned for beneath the proposed tri-nation highway makes me think of the unbelieveably huge underground facility the feds have beneath Loring Air Force base (now closed). There's streets down there, some running miles. I wonder if into nearby Canada as well...

---

...That's some serious hardware you worked on. I appreciate mechanics who work on jets but piston-powered prop people much more so. The simplicity (and maybe the efficiency too) of jet engines is almost galling to me.

Zuma October 31, 2007 - 12:01am

...top cash crop. I imagine it's simply easier to target grow rooms than it is to get the guys in the woods (who, after all, probably aren't growing top grade stuff). Still, the skies are full of helicopters come harvest season in many good growing areas of this country.

As to where the money goes - we just learned today that the US spends 50 billion a year on the intelligence activities we can admit to.

Gordon October 31, 2007 - 8:23pm

I think you're right. Good point.

Zuma November 1, 2007 - 8:23am

never fear, though, everyone. I purchased FakeWarOnDrugs.com AND SecretAirlinesSuck.com . I mean, how many nodes of conspiracy can there really be? :)

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong December 21, 2007 - 2:41am

All of it. And interesting. It all fits neatly into the current display of hubris and casual lawbreaking we see today. The laundering, international aspects, rigging of the Fed agencies, moving people into spots for influence and control, the small world in which it all fits.

Its no conspiracy. It seems one only need to travel in the right circles to be fully aware of the game. Hot money, new markets, real estate, fed subsidies and protection. Nice racket.

ww December 21, 2007 - 9:12am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.