Lawless Nation - Congress


By Michael Collins
Part II of III (Part I)

WASHINGTON - Placed in office through legalized bribery, supported by public funding for their every need, protected against the laws that we're expected to obey, Congress represents the epitome of lawlessness; lawmakers who have no regard for the law. (Image)

Members of Congress are different. They get to retire at age 62 with lifetime pensions and health benefits. To qualify, they need just five years of service. They get free phone, mail, and other communications plus paid domestic and foreign travel. Supposedly, they're not allowed to take gifts but the list of exceptions offers plenty of room for luxurious appreciation.

The biggest gift of all - a six to seven figure job with a major corporation or lobbying firm right after retirement - is still fair game for any member. The revolving door never stops.

But supposedly Congress passes laws for the public benefit. They come to power based on contributions from their patrons, usually large donors. Then members resolutely deny that these contributions translate into legislation favorable to the donors. If pressed, member's state that the contributions merely buy access not votes.

In fact, members routinely vote the interests of their largest patrons. Thus, the contributions are a form of legalized bribery ("a favor or promise given to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust.").

The financial industry contributed hundreds of millions to current members. When Wall Street was about to fail in late 2008, they called in their markers and got an immediate bailout of $700 billion and "total potential Federal Government support (that) could reach up to $23.7 trillion" from the Federal Reserve and other government sources. This was in the midst of the 2008 federal election cycle when members solicited funds from the very people they bailed out.

Would this have happened without years of contributions by the financial industry?

What other incentives were involved that were not revealed?

The people face a health care crisis of epic proportions, losing insurance, under coverage for life threatening conditions. They have to delay or cease medication due to ever rising costs. Health care is unaffordable to many.

Congress addressed the problem much like they did the financial crisis. A bill was passed that left health insurance companies at the center of health care taking a handsome profit for doing little to nothing. Prior to passage of the health bill, the insurers raised rates shamelessly and did so again after the legislation was enacted, using the very health reform passed for the people to gouge the people for more money.

In the midst of total unemployment at about 20%, with the poverty on the rise, what has Congress done? The vast majority of citizens get little or not attention while those who cause the financial meltdown are handsomely rewarded. Members of Congress fret that they simply can't get the votes to help the people. But we know different.

It's planned failure that serves their wealthy donors. That's not a system of laws. It's an oligarchy with a strong dose of kleptocracy.

Congress routinely ignores the Constitution. Article I outlines "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress." Section 8 of the article lists this power: "To declare War." When presidents make war without congressional authorization, Congress passes legislation that negates its war making powers in order to legitimize the illegal act by the executive branch.

These wars are funded by Congress even when a war was found to be based on lies, as was the case in Iraq. Congress continues to fund the efforts claiming it is necessary to protect the troops. They fail to acknowledge that the absence of illegal wars harmful to the nation is the best troop protection available.

With the illegal wars underway, Congress passes legislation to address the problems created by the illegal wars in the name of national security. As they do this, the real issues of national security, the legal rights of citizens and the economic well being of the nation, are violated or ignored.

A key function of Congress is oversight and investigation. When the nation was attacked on 9/11, the hapless response by the executive branch was on full display. A 2002 House - Senate Joint Committee detailed the extensive government knowledge of the emerging plot over years without effective executive action to stop it. Nothing came of the report. It is as though it never occurred.

When the 9/11 Commission was finally established, Congress allowed a former Bush administration insider to serve as the executive director and appointed co-chairmen who thought that the executive director was just fine. It came as no surprise when a thoroughly inadequate report was produced with key sections blacked out.

Illegal wars, the stripping of fundamental rights like habeas corpus, the declaration that presidents have the right to assassinate U.S. citizens by executive order, the rendering of charges without having to specify those charges were all ratified by Congress. It must be legal. Didn't Congress pass a law?

But they couldn't do this without the full cooperation of the judicial branch of government. Surely, our Supreme Court and federal judiciary are the last bastion of the law that is to protect us all.

Even if that were the case, the sheer weight of executive and legislative lawlessness presents an overwhelming tide that is irresistible to those in power. The seamless system of self-supporting lawlessness is an efficient structure denying citizen rights by mocking the laws of the nation.

END

See A Contract by Congress with Citizens of the United States

This article may be reproduced in part or in whole with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.


Michael Collins October 7, 2010 - 1:08am
( categories: USA: Congress )

I'm sure that some people think that that kind of privileges are granted only to the royal family of Saudi-Arabia. But these things are completely different, whispers the propaganda into your ear.


-- 80% of Americans believe they are better-than-average drivers

Singular October 7, 2010 - 4:49am

The best prognosticator over time that I know says we'll end up like Mexico on our current course but maybe they'll be a blending of models. Once they whispered about their corruption, now they're talking openly and, in the case of the Tea Party, shouting it out loud.

Michael Collins October 7, 2010 - 11:34am

In my mind, the number one problem in our govt today is the flood of money washing over all our elected officials. How do we drain this swamp? Is it public funding of campaigns or bust?

zot23 October 7, 2010 - 10:31am

It's campaign money from the general treasury of corporations, thanks to the special efforts of Chief Justice Roberts to pull the dormant Citizens United case up from the lower courts. But there's more. The 'revolving door' is hugely profitable and, of course, the creation of laws and regulations based on a focused interest is worth billions and billions.

The problem is that we 'can't get there from here.' Do you ask a seriously addicted person what the best program is for rehabilitation? Generally not, although there is often a willingness to get batter. Members of the political class are the ultimate addicts, to power and money, and they will not vote reasonable regulations on their behavior (unwilling to get better). McCain-Feingold is a nice gesture from another time but it is not and never was remotely adequate to keep campaigns from becoming a feeding frenzy for The Money Party.

The attachment at the end, the idea for a contract that the pols would have to sign, comes from the business class in Republic of Venice centuries ago. It worked extremely well. Unfortunately, there's no co9nsensus here that this would even be desirable among those powerful enough to make it happen.

Michael Collins October 7, 2010 - 11:20am

The lack of civic responsibility in the leadership of the United States is fairly typical of an empire in decline. To refer to an unfashionable historian, Arnold J. Toynbee would simply speak of the loss of vitality in the "civilization."
We can last for quite a long while, with no one believing any of the Fourth of July bromides about the Government Of the People, By the People, and For the People, but it is historically quite unusual for a recovery of belief, once the leadership of a world power has lost its faith. It would be nice if we could replicate the example of Austria-Hungary prior to World War One, but we seem to be leaning more toward the example of the late Soviet Union, exhausting ourselves in foreign adventures and xenophobia.
I am personally committed to urging the adoption of the Ten Key Values of the Green Party.

mmeo October 7, 2010 - 11:21am

This old dog gets trotted out every year. I am frankly bored with it, unless you are willing to talk about the overreach aspects of it that is used by the Republican Party. That the Chamber of Commerce can go to foreign governments and raise money and then throw $75 million at the races in the US, is on a different scale than The Democrats being able to raise $15 million in small donations in September.

It's expensive in the United States to run for office, enough said. All the whining about it is just boring without context, or specific examples, or SOMETHING. You can run an expensive campaign, draw legitimate support and carry on in public office in a respectable fashion. There are plenty in congress who do, and the money raising bit has been with this process for well nigh 120 years.

As far as retirements and pensions. I think being elected as a member of Congress is a hell of a gig, and deserving of some accolades. You serve the country in the military and you get a decent pension. A thank you, a time well served. It's frankly a very shitty job, and anyone living in those apartments in DC away from their families having to fly all over the place and be yelled at all the time. As far as money goes it is such a pittance, that it is utter waste of breath to carp about it. Who cares? Bribery, a pension? I don't feel particularly 'Bribed' with my pension. A 401k allows you to retire at 59.5, the military lets you retire after 40 years. Meh.

What do you PROPOSE? Besides empty rhetoric and hyperbole??

Scotjen61 October 7, 2010 - 12:23pm

in no way compares to 20 years of military service and in no way deserves the same accolades. It is hard to feel financially sorry for our representatives when they campaign on one thing and change their mind once in office. Wouldn't it be a hoot if they actually were paid for actually accomplishing something - both parties.

What do you PROPOSE? Besides empty rhetoric and hyperbole??

please tame down your rhetoric, it is unnecessary and not productive.

Tina October 7, 2010 - 2:46pm

I do present a solution at the end of the piece - a contract, just like the obligations we're under as members of the work force.

See A Contract by Congress with Citizens of the United States

Michael Collins October 7, 2010 - 3:03pm

The point about Congressional privileges isn't begrudging individuals benefits. It's that these privileges remove the legislators from the concerns of the people they should be representing. A person who has economic security finds it easy to devalue those who don't. Tie privileges of the powerful to those of the powerless and you get a much better society; if the answer to the question, how can I make my life better? is "by making your life better", your life will be made better. If the answer is, "by delivering goods to my cronies", his cronies will get goods. If the answer is, "by making your life worse", your life will be made worse. And so on. There are exceptions, and some periods are more idealistic than others. But generally, democracy is based on the idea that government of the people, by the people, and for the people is the best government.

The level of privilege that legislators lavish on themselves while not enacting similar privileges for those they represent promotes the degeneration of democracy. I don't begrudge the legislators their privileges. I think all of us should have secure pensions allowing us to retire at 62 after 5 years service, the kind of health care available to Congress, and so on. This is a large, rich, productive country, which could provide much better lives for the majority of its people if the powerful were genuinely invested in that outcome.

nihil obstet October 7, 2010 - 3:45pm

A person who has economic security finds it easy to devalue those who don't. nihil obstet

I'll happily ackowlege the source when I quote it.

The devaluation leads to feelings of "specialness" and superiority. The rest is all downhill.

There are some excellent debates beckoning about changes to public policy, expanding Social Security for example, that never take place because of the insulation of Congress for the very reason you quoted.

We're at the point now where the representatives either party benefits from an election, whether they win or not.

Michael Collins October 7, 2010 - 5:22pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.