Categories

Archives

Kind Of D-baggy There, Conor…

After reading this column, I have to scratch my head a little.

Check out Chuck Todd, NBC’s chief White House correspondent, openly speculating that President Obama is going to embrace same-sex marriage because he needs money from gay people. “Gay money in this election has replaced Wall Street money,” he reported. NBC’s David Gregory agreed. For some reason, neither man seemed to think this theory reflects poorly on the president.

Then the conventional wisdom shifted. Observers were basing their guesses on the fact that HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan and Vice President Joe Biden had both made statements in support of same-sex marriage. The same-sex-marriage supporters who praised these developments were as quickly dismayed when the White House walked back Biden’s statements, insisting that like Obama, Biden’s views on the subject were still “evolving,” a euphemism that seems to mean they’ll favor either marriage equality for gays or discrimination against them depending on their moment-to-moment judgments about what’s best for them politically.

Sounds like Mitt Romney’s position!

He goes on to list about a dozen intitiatives that Obama has failed to deliver to progressives on (thus, the snarky jab at “gay money”) but fails to list even one initiative that Obama has succeeded with.

Like Lily Ledbetter. Like healthcare reform (such as it is, it’s still the first success attempt at passing a fairer system for all.) Like any number of other initiatives that came up and passed in the first two years.

Things like this require political capital and if you have an opposition party who’s announced aim is to prevent you from having a second term, you have to deal with the hand dealt you.

Even on the list of things he claims Obama has not accomplished, Obama has accomplished a lot. Take, for example, this ridiculous claim:

· Obama tricked anti-war voters into thinking that he wouldn’t order American troops into battle unless there was an imminent threat to America or a declaration of war from Congress, then went to war in Libya, violating the War Powers Resolution, even though neither condition was met.

Sixteen confirmed troops set foot in Libya, and those were to help in the rebuilding of the US Embassy in Tripoli and none of them were anywhere near the battles. Some rumours placed the number as high as 12,000, but that was Alex Jones, the famous conspiracy nut, humping that theory like a chicken.

Now, he has a point in one regard: Obama made plenty of promises on the campaign trail that he hasn’t kept.

And….your point is? If every politician who ran for office kept all their promises, no one would run for office anymore.

We’d have a dictatorship. Those are the only folks who can guarantee their promises.

Friedersdorf is clearly terrified that, OMG!, Obama might actually be free to make good on many of his promises in a second term!

5 comments to Kind Of D-baggy There, Conor…

  • mmeo

    Actor 212, I won’t attempt to engage your criticism of some third party, but your claim that it is “ridiculous” to state — accurately — that the US “went to war” with Libya is indefensible.

    Bombing is an act of war. Steadily bombing, bombing until the side you support wins, not to mention putting in troops, is engaging in war. The war-mongering US Congress chose not to prosecute Obama for violation of the War Powers Act, but the fact is, he did violate it.

    What’s ridiculous is your public affirmation that Black Is White.

  • Steve Hynd

    Having read the entire article, I have to say I agree with Connor and his list.

    Notice also that he’s not actually saying that Obama should try to enact marriage equality legislation, simply that Obama’s getting off the fence one way or another would vastly influence the debate.

  • Steve Hynd

    Obama endorsed same-sex marriage today.

    Same as he did in 1996 before deciding he couldn’t decide.

  • Actor 212

    We never landed COMBAT TROOPS in Libya. I made no comment with regard to “going to war”

  • zot23

    Then he immediately stated it was something for each state to handle. Wow, big endorsement Mr. Prez:

    http://uk.reuters.com/video/2012/05/09/obama-same-sex-couples-should-be-able-to?videoId=234728383&newsChannel=usPoliticsNews

    With friends like these, who needs enemas?

    The silver lining here is the LGBT community isn’t going to go away or stop applying pressure until they get it federally recognized that they have the full and equal rights of any other hetero couple. Of all the groups on the left, the LGBT has been the absolute best at hanging tough and never ceasing their pressure for what they need. Now that Obama has talked the talk, they will push him (hard and before Nov) to walk the walk. Too bad unions, environmentalists, and progressives haven’t grown the same spine as the LGBT community, it’s paying major dividends for them. All you have to do to get results is to be willing to walk away and let the politician sink on their own – suddenly they get very responsive to your needs.

    We’ll see, but this is good even if it is weak salve from Obama. I mean, how is this really any different from slavery? Especially from our first black president, this indifference to equality is gross. It is not up to the states to deny citizens their basic rights. Shame Obama, shame.

Leave a Reply