It's time to send a message...because the world is watching


(cross-posted to The People's Republic of Seabrook)

With news coming out of Tibet about what looks to be another brutal Chinese crackdown on dissent (which the Dalai Lama is calling "cultural genocide"), I find myself wondering how those of us in the West can make ourselves heard. How can we impress upon the Chinese government that their behavior is reprehensible beyond words, and that we expect them to respect human rights both inside and outside their borders? Clearly, the Chinese government is not about freedom and human rights; why else would they be selling arms to Sudan, employing forced prison labor as a profit center, or brutally oppressing the Tibetan people?

I have an idea; it's not going to be popular, and I realize it will never happen. Nonetheless, it's a proposition I believe merits serious consideration. In 1980, to demonstrate America's condemnation of the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, US President Jimmy Carter decided to boycott the Moscow Summer Olympics. It's a decision that's still controversial today, but I believe that it was the right decision. Carter used his prerogative to keep the US Olympic team home that summer, thus embarrassing the Soviets and making the point that America had the capacity and the willingness to take a moral stand. Ultimately, the boycott accomplished little besides sending a message heard by few and remembered by fewer. Nonetheless, taking a moral stand was the right thing to do. While it may not have accomplished it's intended goal, Carter's boycott was a principled stand taken by a President willing to do the right thing...even if it was unpopular at the time.

Today we have an opportunity to take a stand against Chinese international immorality and poor citizenship by hitting them where it hurts. I believe it's time for Our Glorious and Benevolent Leader © to threaten an American boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympics unless the Chinese withdraw from Tibet, cease using prison labor as a profit center, and stop selling arms to Sudan. If China demurs, then the US team should be kept home this summer. China would then be forced to deal with the reality of an Olympics significantly tarnished and diminished in significance. It's not often that the US has legitimate leverage it can use against China. Given our sizable trade deficit with China, and the reality that Chinese capital is increasingly financing our economy (effectively the equivalent of a $4000 loan to every American man, woman, and child over the past ten years), it's not as if we have much that we can threaten to withhold. The reality is that we need China far more than China needs us. Nonetheless, a threat of a boycott, or an actual boycott if the Chinese prove intransigent will send a strong, clear message that the US will not tolerate human rights abuses and the support of genocide.

OK, back here in the real world, I understand that the chance of this happening are about the same as my being elected the next American Idol. There are those who would argue that politics and sports shouldn't mix. While I can't say that I disagree with this argument, the reality is that politics and sports have always butted heads. How often do you see an Israeli team competing in an Arab country? Taiwan only has an Olympic team because after being recognized by the IOC, mainland China pitched a fit, throwing their weight around in such a manner that Taiwan can use neither the country's name or their flag. They must compete under the Olympic flag as "Chinese Taipei". I could go on, but you get the point. Politics and sport are all two often flip sides of the same coin. And it's not as if an Olympic boycott hasn't ever been directed at the US. The 1984 Los Angeles Summer Olympics went forward despite a boycott by the Soviet Union. Whether or not you agree with this line of reasoning or not, the reality is that most of the world sees sport as a subordinate arm of government.

It's very unlikely that the US will have this sort of leverage available again. The fact of the matter is that China has us by the short hairs. They know it...and if Americans were paying attention, we would, too. We're simply too deeply dependent on Chinese capital to even pretend that we have anything resembling leverage. If we don't take advantage of this opportunity to force the Chinese to take positive action, it will be a LONG time before we have anything even remotely resembling this kind of leverage at our disposal. We can do the right thing...or we can sit back and be complicit in the brutal reality of China placing it's self-interest above all else.

Like we don't already know what the Reign of Error © will do....

I'm a realist, and I understand that the chances of the Worst President EVER showing any degree of moral courage in this matter hovers somewhere below zero. It's too bad, really, because the Beijing Olympics present an outstanding opportunity for this sorry excuse for a human being President to take steps that may actually result in a positive outcome. He could be the President who saved Darfur, freed Tibet, and perhaps even made life better for China's prison population. This would, however require a degree of courage and foresight that The Decider © has yet to display even a glimmer of.

The other problem, of course, is that over the past eight years, the US has lost whatever moral authority that created and nurtured during the Clinton Administration. Our illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq has eroded American standing worldwide to the point where we're almost universally reviled (So, how's that international pariah status working out for you?).

An argument could be made that the US is in no moral position to be attempting to coerce China when we've so casually blown off the will of the international community regarding the war in Iraq. No intelligent and credible observer could credibly argue with that contention. It's not as if America has been playing well with others- particularly since 9.11. Even worse, this Administration has proven itself willing to do whatever it takes to cozy up to China. After all, we need them more than they need us, remember?

An American boycott of the Beijing Olympics will never happen, of course, but that doesn't mean it's not an idea worthy of serious, thoughtful consideration. Those of us who regard ourselves as people of conscience really have nothing else to hang our hats on besides a solid moral argument...and we all know how receptive the Chinese government is to that sort of persuasion.

In the end, exactly nothing will change...which is too bad, because I believe that history will judge this as a missed opportunity, one that will cost thousands their lives. When you're responsible for a couple hundred thousand deaths, though, what's a few thousand more? I think it was Stalin who said that while one death is a tragedy, a million is just a number. How true...and how sad.

WE DESERVE BETTER...and so does the rest of the world.


Jack Cluth March 16, 2008 - 10:14am
( categories: Asia | Opinion | Tibet )

I disagree for several reasons. First we are in no moral position to tell anyone what to do. Second, I think it likely that once the dust has settled, we will find that, as with Myanmar, this set of disruptions has likely been fomented by our CIA as part of our mindless set of small scale attacks on the Chinese. These acts of aggression plus a boycott of their Olympics in support of our aggression just proves how uncivil we are - it doesn't persuade the Chinese to be civil themselves. We have some small success with the Chinese in Darfur because we are not implicated in the underlying strife.

There will come a time to support Tibetan independence. Not now.

hvd March 16, 2008 - 12:35pm

hvd is quite right. Americans are not in a position to give moral guidance to anyone, no matter what they do. The US is far and away the worst human rights violator on the planet now, there's no question about it. One of the worst in history, in fact. You're 5 times more likely to be in prison if you're an American than if you are Chinese. The US has a long history of attacking and killing innocent people, millions of them, and a long history of violating people's human rights. These never-ending criticisms of China are just a way for Americans (and the equally despicable British) to divert attention from their own, far worse, crimes. And it's time people in the world stood up to the US and the UK and tell them to get their own houses in order before they start criticizing others.

And besides, no one in the world any longer pays any attention when the US criticizes other nations. The US has lost all credibility and international respect, and its constant criticism is just seen as hypocrisy.

jonbrown March 16, 2008 - 1:13pm

And so, America as a whole, its entire population, should just be quiet because the Bush Administration is "not in a position to give moral guidance to anyone?" How cowardly. Yes, America needs to get its house in order, but in the meantime, the U.S., the E.U., and Japan need to find their collective backbone with regard to China. I mean, come on, how serious can Wen Jiabao be to blame the Dalai Lama for the riots (that's like blaming any African American leader for the Rodney King L.A. riots). Life is cheap in China - the real subtext to cheap labor being available to drive the growth of military state capital globally. It's not just China that's to blame for the abhorrent human rights conditions there - it's the U.S., the E.U., and Japan for taking advantage of the system of indentured servitude that drives China's growing economy.

So, ultimately, using the logic of jonbrown's argument, we'd all just end up standing around letting the worst prevail. I reject such a notion as not only cowardly, but inhuman. Yes, China should be condemned for its actions, as should the U.S. At least in the U.S., those who condemn their own government don't get hauled in for re-education. The U.S. as "the worst human rights violator on the planet now?" Please. Educate yourself before even considering such a ridiculous claim. The U.S. is far, far from perfect, but I would invite you to spend a few months working under lock-down conditions in a Chinese factory, drinking unsafe water and receiving substandard healthcare, before claiming that the U.S. is the "worst human rights violator."

Tyrannio March 18, 2008 - 6:28am

BASSETERRE, St. Kitts (AP) — International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge poured cold water Saturday on calls for a boycott of the Summer Games in Beijing over China's crackdown in Tibet, saying it would only hurt athletes.

"We believe that the boycott doesn't solve anything," Rogge told reporters on this Caribbean island. "On the contrary, it is penalizing innocent athletes and it is stopping the organization from something that definitely is worthwhile organizing."
More

adrena March 16, 2008 - 2:25pm

The Olympic Committee should be consistent with how they implement and execute their decisions on who gets the Olympics. If China is okay – should Zimbabwe get it next? It will be consistent with what they call “the Olympic” values. Or maybe we should have a closer look at their values – if we can find it. More on this in my blog at http://angryafrican.wordpress.com/2008/02/09/and-the-olympics-goes-to-zimbabwe/

Maybe the US can start there. Either push the IOC or ask for Zimbabwe to get the next Olympics.

Angry African March 16, 2008 - 6:42pm

would get its own house in order, sure boycott China.
Until then, don't criticize.
The only thing I can do is buy locally and look at the labels.
Yes, it costs more sometimes. But I buy NA made products.
Do you?

repressive governments mix administrative clumsiness & inefficiency with authoritarian tendencies.

kimmy March 16, 2008 - 10:23pm

So when Aztlan declares independence in a few years, deep in the heart of the Greater Depression, and La Raza is struggling for independence in the streets of San Diego, Phoenix, Albuquerque, and San Antonio, will you happily let them secede, taking along California, Arizona, New Mexico and most of Texas? Or will you look the other way when they are put down (quite savagely) by the military and shipped off to Halliburton Happy Camps?

Sure, there's a century of difference between Tibet being Chinese and Northern Mexico being an Anglo possession. When does the statue of limitations run out of the right of a people to self-rule? Of course, we're different here in the States, right?

Apocalypse Khan

Temujin March 17, 2008 - 12:33am

I knew a female American athlete that made the 1980 US Olympic track team, then never competed internationally. Her athletic career never reached its peak because of the Moscow boycott. She might have medaled, but we'll never know.

I tend to like boycotts. but in the case of an Olympics boycott, it seems to hurt the athletes most.

I've been in those Lhasa temples (twirled every prayer wheel on the inner Jokhang circuit) and I'm very upset about the Chinese crackdown. I have no doubt Chinese soldiers are on some kind of calculated rampage. No one beats the Chinese government for a wider implementation of Control Freak. That snow leopards are extinct is the result of indiscriminate automatic weapons fire from Han guns after occupying Tibet. I've heard Hans refer to Tibetans as monkeys. It's not pretty. This was in 1985 and I realized racism seemed to have no boundaries, and no bottom.

trob March 17, 2008 - 12:37am

Senator sends stern letter to Olympic boss as world leaders ask China to show restraint

An influential Canadian senator has sent a blunt letter to the president of the International Olympic Committee urging the sports body to use its leverage to convince China to end its bloody crackdown on pro-independence activists in Tibet.

The letter, sent yesterday by Conservative Consiglio Di Nino to Jacques Rogge, asks the IOC to prevent China from passing the Olympic torch through Tibet, scheduled for early next month, and to demand that the Chinese restore rights and freedoms to Tibetans.

"Under the present circumstances," he wrote, "it is difficult to see how bringing the torch through Tibet ... can be seen as anything but an act of domination."

At this stage, no one is even close to calling for a boycott of the Games, set for Beijing in August.

But Mr. Di Nino, chairman of Parliamentary Friends of Tibet, an all-party group of MPs and senators that advocates greater freedoms for Tibetans, said the IOC must speak out against China's behaviour "to demonstrate the sincerity" of the sports body's promise that the Olympics will bring improvements in human rights to China.

"I urge you to publicly call upon China's leadership to restore the fundamental rights and freedoms of Tibetan people," the letter said. "The denial of these basic rights over so many years should no longer be overlooked by those in positions of influence who can make a difference."
More

adrena March 18, 2008 - 10:37am

I endorse hvd's comments. Dont you feel shame Jack that when those bloody US and their cronies rape and murder and maime that country of iraq, forcing its millions of children to starve and die, and ransack it with millions of DUs, your conscience and morality goes and hide under the imperialist hide and now to come out in support of the buddhists in tibet? ho, your proposal to teach chinese a lesson,by
boycotting olympics and all those shit..who cares about olympics and
such games mr. jack, when you and your real people are playing the real games along with that bastard of a bush and his war mongering pimps. dont come with your preaching. and dont give us a damn shit about morality and the good doings the US and others doing in the present world. shame on people like you. shame.

Rajeeve Chelanat March 19, 2008 - 2:50am

I'm sure that many Agonists as well as I now agree heartily with your viewpoint, expressed so eloquently and persuasively.

[/snark]

Rick March 19, 2008 - 8:28am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.