So Israel has publicly denied they seriously contemplated a strike against Iran and her nuclear facilities given the current intelligence. This claim has been echoed by American sources, like Leon Panetta.
THE head of Israel’s foreign intelligence service made a secret trip to Washington this month to gauge the likely US reaction to a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
The content of Mossad chief Tamir Pardo’s discussion with his American counterparts has been revealed in a Newsweek article titled ”Obama’s Dangerous Game With Iran”.
Unnamed US officials claim that Mr Pardo’s line of questioning to David Petraeus, the CIA chief, ran: ”What is our [US] posture on Iran? Are we ready to bomb? Would we [do so later]? What does it mean if [Israel] does it anyway?”
That certainly sounds like the contemplation of an imminent attack to me.
Much of this alarm is centered on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report last fall that suggested strongly that Iran was developing a weapons program. Iran has denied that, claiming any nuclear facility development was for peaceful purposes, like domestic energy requirements.
A clearer picture, however, is given by the reactions of both French and Chinese diplomats have been urging Iran to better cooperate with the IAEA inspectors, who may already have a report in the pipeline that paints a not-flattering picture of Iran.