Has the Dollar Hegemony's Tipping Point Been Passed?


According to the Financial times the Euro accounts for 26.4% of foreign reserve holdings, up 2% from 24.4% just six months ago. However there are now more Euros in physical circulation than Dollars and most tellingly more international bonds are issed in Euros than Dollars.

As a special kick in the pants there's this:

But the Commission report cited empirical studies highlighting the increasing “gravitational pull” of the euro on foreign exchange markets, which was becoming “more important for certain emerging market currencies, notably in South America”.

When South America, of all places, is moving off the dollar, you've got problems. This is America's Monroe Doctrine imperial backwater.

At this point only inertia (dollar reserves built up in the past) and the still primary role of the dollar in buying oil are keeping the dollar as the world's primary reserve currency.

With the US still intending to drop interest rates (and thus further crash the dollar) and with the European Central Bank apparently intending to hold still, this is likely to continue. When the US goes into a real recession there may be a modest recovery of the dollar but I doubt it'll be more than modest.

The dollar hegemony's risky future was obvious almost four years ago when Stirling, Oldman and myself were writing about for the late BOP news. The cost will be more than folks want to admit, Oldman once calculated that it had been worth .5% GDP growth per year every since Bretton Woods.

But the key moment is when US consumers stop being "the consumer of last resort" and other currencies actually float against the US. As with a drug dependency, while it's necessary that this happen, the US is far too physically addicted for the process to be anything but extremely painful, leading to, quite likely, a 20% drop in the US's standard of living in a period of two to three years. Mishandled it could go as high as 30%.

When will that happen? When the drug dealers (China and Japan, primarily) cut the crack-head off because Uncle Sam's credit is no good any more. They've got really good reasons not to do that, but they're also staring at that huge pile of dollars and realizing that if they ever actually try and spend it, the very attempt to do so will make it worthless.

Catch-22, because Japan's addicted to effective negative interest rates and China's addicted to huge export subsidies courtesy of their undervalued currency. But Japan is beginning to realize that low interest rates aren't getting them out of their doldrums, and China's endless running of the money presses is coming back as a nasty case of runaway inflation that is far worse than the headline numbers indicate, because the inland areas which have almost no inflation are being averaged with the coastal areas which have double digit inflation.

Three addicts, none of who have been willing to get off their relative addictions, propping each other up.

Wonder who'll fall first.


Ian Welsh December 31, 2007 - 1:44am
( categories: Economics )

of reducing the short to mid term risks of a dollar crash on Chinese dollar holdings. As I see it the Chinese buy real assets, such as citi and Morgan, as opposed to sitting on worthless bonds . This way they spend their dollars and reduce their currency risk.

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley December 31, 2007 - 2:50am

owning dollar denominated assets. Better than bonds, but still in dollars.

Ian Welsh December 31, 2007 - 3:52am

What exactly does this mean? South American bond issuers are increasingly denominating in euros? Or is it that governments are contemplating severing their links to the dollar or changing their basket weights? The first is a natural market response to the strength of the euro and its buying power. The second is a policy response of long term significance. I suspect the FT can only point to the first at the moment.

These governments aren't going to act unless they see their trade and investment flows shifting to the euro and away from the dollar. That seems to be happening slowly but it is important nonetheless because it goes to the core of your argument. South America is relying less on the U.S. for its economic well being. It's only a matter of time before the exchange rate policies shift as well.

I thought what was just as interesting was that there are now more euro notes in circulation than dollar notes. The drug dealers are even abandoning a sinking currency.

I followed along on your argument about the 0.5% per annum boost to GDP from having the reserve currency of the world, but I didn't follow how this translates to a 20% decline in living standards if the dollar loses its hegemony. How is this calculated?

I can certainly see U.S. living standards lurching downwards as this credit crisis plays out and debt markets shut down permanently in some cases. I can also see that if the world returned to a credit market where the lender had to hold the debt until maturity rather than syndicate it away, there would be a lot less credit available to the U.S. About 70% of US corporate bonds are already rated junk debt. Is this drying up of the money spigot where you see the decline in living standards?

Numerian December 31, 2007 - 7:20am

The twenty percent is based on what I think the dollar is overvalued and how I think a dollar shock would play out if foreigners became unwilling to lend the US money and the balance of payments had be rebalanced very quickly, which I think could happen if the dollar hegemony (or rather, the consumer of last resort/place to keep safe money of last resort, goes away).

IOW, an Argentina scenario though not with quite the same details (fortunately for the US its debt is in dollars, and it can just print to pay, but I don't think that would wind up a hell of a lot better). It could easily be more than 20%.

Nothing to do with the .5% per annum stuff, that's in the past, my bad for making it seem otherwise. Just wanted to indicate that the dollar hegemony had been worth having for a long time.

Ian Welsh December 31, 2007 - 8:03am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.