SearchUser loginNavigationTeam AgonistThoughtfulAbu Aardvark GlobalaliasBruce TimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Who's onlineThere are currently 5 users and 494 guests online.
Online users:Syndicate |
Citigroup: Assets Aren't Money
I didn't, honestly, entirely understand what he was saying, back then. Citigroup apparently didn't either, but it's learning:
In english, Citi doesn't have enough cash, or cash equivlaents on hand to maintain its ratio of capital to debt. Sure, it's worth far, far more than 7.5 billion, but much of that is in assets that are illiquid, whose value is based on "modeling" and are suspect. Or, odds are, both - illiquid and overvalued on the books. None of that matters as long as people are willing to give you credit, and buy your assets at "book" price. But when people start saying "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash" as those who came out of the Depression were wont to do, and financial institutions even today tend to do during a crisis--suddenly your theoretical net worth becomes a lot less meaningful and what matters is how much cash, cash equivalents and near cash instruments you have. Citi doesn't have enough. And this won't be the last infusion they need. Oh yeah, and I wouldn't bet on them maintaining divdends, either. Nor, if I were an investor, would I want them to. Ian Welsh November 27, 2007 - 6:05am
( categories: Miscellany )
|
![]() |