The Lost Art of Pulling Together


Something strikes me as odd as I follow news of the fires in Southern California.

I grew up in British Columbia, where my father was a forester, most of his friends were foresters, and many of them had worked for the Forest Service, or for Parks. When there was a big fire in BC that the normal crews couldn't handle, here's what happened -- they started drafting people. They'd just stop every car on the road, and if you looked like you could do hard manual labor, you were suddenly on a fire crew. And you were on it for the duration of the fire, bud. Don't like it? Tough.

Now I'm not saying that this should necessarily be done in Southern California, but I keep hearing that there aren't enough fire fighters. At its heart a fire fighter needs an axe, a shovel, a grubline, a place to sleep, and trucks to take him or her to the next place. That's it, that's all. Yeah, there's some danger, but perhaps it's less than letting the fires spiral out of control?

The fire fighting services should be set up like old-style armies -- in the case of a big fire, they are expected to expand. Every regular firefighter will find himself in charge of an entire squad of firefighters. Whether drafted, or simply volunteers (and I'm sure thousands would volunteer if asked), you've suddenly got a lot more people.

The idea that everything has to be done by "professionals" is profoundly disempowering. And it's a pattern in the US. In Katrina, volunteers who rushed into the area to help were deliberately turned away by FEMA and other authorities, all of whom were busy doing not much of anything but botching the job. Sure, some of the volunteers might have messed up, or gotten themselves hurt, but in aggregate they would have done far more good than harm.

Same thing with firefighting. Get them a shovel and an axe and get them out there. If you're scared of having them on the very front lines, have them building the firebreaks further back. More than that -- be smart and enlist construction crews with their heavy equipment and use them to build the firebreaks further back.

In Katrina there were cries about how they couldn't get people there fast enough. I laughed so hard I cried. The President could simply have asked every airline and shipping company to call a special number and volunteer. Within 12 hours there would have been more than enough transit for everyone. But somehow it never happened.

The ability to mass mobilize society has been lost. I don't know where it went, but it's a great pity -- because you can't afford to pay for enough capacity to deal with massive emergencies. You must rely on volunteers or draftees who understand it is their civic duty. Note that people hated being drafted for fire duty in BC, but no one though it was less than their duty as a citizen. And that means you must be able to deal with bulking up on volunteers quickly. There's a science to it, and it's a science that our parents' and grandparents' generation understood very well.

We'd better rediscover it.

(Photo by Andrew Gornbert / EPA)


Ian Welsh October 25, 2007 - 5:00am
( categories: USA )

privatization.
someone should coin the word deprive-itization, it describes the process better.
http://www.princeton.edu/~starr/meaning.html

dk October 25, 2007 - 6:01am

That's great dk! And, quite witty and funny!!! It's also a really great idea. It's catchy and has that kind of instant PR effect.

Eric Gen October 25, 2007 - 7:07am

you have no idea what an achievement that is for me! :D
but read the link if you have time, it's quite good.

and mad props to Jimbo

dk October 25, 2007 - 7:36am

on the way home from dinner at friends of Master 23.

The volunteers were still there 3 1/2 hours for training.

I understand that female volunteers now outnumber the males, since the devastating Canberra bushfire a few years back.

The picture Ian posted gave me a flashback to the fear i felt seeing the south west of Canberra alight back then. But at the time we all got in and worked in the local area.

I was surprised how many sightseers though got in the way, and refused to retreat as the fire came up the hill where we were rescuing horses. Fortunately the wind changed as evening approached.

Its all about other people these days, no personal involvement and acceptance that we are community.

'deprive-itization' is well coined. The goddess has it indexed now. Well done dk :)

graham October 25, 2007 - 7:15am

"I keep hearing that there aren't enough fire fighters" - really? I actually haven't heard that once. Certainly not from anyone credible. Although I've had similar thoughts recently, I don't really think that the problem calls for more bodies. Even so, in practical terms, the fire fighters would need a bit more equipment than just an axe or a shovel.

Basically, these firestorms occur when there is, low humidity, abundant fuel, and high wind -- and usually on steep hillsides or in canyons. With those factors in play, putting a bunch of bodies on the ground is really just putting more people in harm's way. Conditions are bad enough that crews really only get sent out to try to protect houses and those efforts are limited by water and hoses. Moreover, when fires can jump huge distances, untrained people are a huge liability since fast evacuation can be necessary.

Really, once these things start, there's very little that can be done. Considering that there is basically nothing that people can do to control humidity or wind conditions, it's pretty clear that aggressive fuel management policy (which, thankfully, seems to be getting more popular), maintaining logistics infrastructure for evacuation (which seems to be going very well here), and more prudent residential construction (never going to happen) should be the primary options for dealing with this sort of fire hazard.

NateTG October 25, 2007 - 8:31am

But, from what I understand, fires are also the way forests renew themselves, they are part of the cycle. As for New Orleans, the problem ultimately is that humans want to live in places where nature has other plans. Yes, it's a tragedy, but...

creativelcro October 25, 2007 - 9:36am

Many of the plants in the area, including the great sequoias further north need the heat of a fire to break open cones and seed shells, so they can germinate and reproduce.
Too much fire suppression disturbs this cycle and allows more material to build up, thus causing hotter fires that can actually destroy the plant and the seed.
It would be a lot better to do proper planning and zoning to acomodate nature in this respect and to also build fireproof housing. Cheap asphalt shingle roof in a fire zone...not smart.

JT October 25, 2007 - 9:47am

KATRINA'S LESSONS LEARNED: Indeed, state and federal officials deserve credit for their efforts combating the fires and keeping injuries to a minimum. In San Diego county, local officials placed more than 200,000 reverse 911 calls to residents, urging them to evacuate their homes. California's "state and local coordination, communication and planning for fires and other events are well advanced, built on decades of experience." White House Press Secretary Dana Perino pointed to the swift evacuation order as one of the "lessons learned" after Hurricane Katrina. "There's increased coordination and communication and earlier communication and coordination between the federal, state and local governments," she said. "We have learned those lessons and those lessons are being applied." Thousands of Californians who took refuge at San Diego's Qualcomm Stadium had an experience far different from refugees who fled to New Orleans' Superdome in the wake of Katrina. Californians were greeted there by clean cots, tents, pillows, and blankets. "Volunteers offered massage therapy, yoga, kosher food, and art projects for kids," and others arrived in clown suits to entertain the children. "We have the luxury of being able to count on our neighbors," San Diego Mayor Gerald Robert Sanders said. "The folks in New Orleans didn't have that luxury, because everybody was impacted."

WAR STRETCHES DISASTER RESOURCES: Despite the proactive and immediate response by the local officials, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq continue to eat up resources and thus limit disaster response efforts. "Right now, we are down 50 percent in terms of our National Guard equipment because they're all in Iraq, the equipment, half of the equipment," Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said. "What we really need are those firefighters, we need the equipment, we need, frankly, we need those troops back from Iraq," said Lt. Gov. John Garamendi (D). California was forced to pull 200 guard members from the Mexico border and deploy state prison inmates to fight the fires. This is not the first time that the war in Iraq has diverted resources from natural disasters at home. Last May, when tornadoes slammed into Kansas, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) said that National Guard's response was made "much slower" because so much of its force was deployed to Iraq. "I have said for nearly two years, and will continue to say, that we have a looming crisis on our hands when it comes to National Guard equipment in Iraq and our needs here at home," she said. A January report by the Government Accountability Office reported that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq drained stateside resources for the National Guard, possibly hampering its ability to react effectively to a natural disaster.

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/progressreport
lotsa links at site

Tina October 25, 2007 - 10:25am

ah a bc lad like myself,though i'm a van islander so there would be plenty difference.

not too far from here we have the mars water bombers and im pretty sure one or two of them were sent down to help. luckily, they wernt turned away, but then we are talking about upper middle class homes!! not a bunch of poor people with large black percentages.

Warvigilent October 25, 2007 - 11:09am

It is part of the natural cycle here. We need to plan for burns, protect structures and keep people out of the way. I don't think adding untrained people to the lines helps much.

What should happen is that fire breaks and lines should be attended to before fire season, and for that we could certainly draft people to help. In the communities here that are following the strict defensible space guidelines, and clearing to the 100 foot limit around homes, not a single home has been lost. But this is tough to get people to buy into.

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.”

Charles Darwin

darwin October 25, 2007 - 12:19pm

the main point: The idea that everything has to be done by "professionals" is profoundly disempowering. And it's a pattern in the US. is absolutely spot on.

Whether it's insurance companies afraid of lawsuits (and lawyers looking for deep pockets), or "professions" that seek to maximize income by limiting access (while cloaking the quotidian nature of their jobs with an esoteric vocabulary), the good old 'murrican value of self-reliance is pretty well fucked these days.

Necessity might soon change that, though.

Gordon October 25, 2007 - 1:05pm

Since 1980, the dominant theme of political and social life is that nobody owes anybody else anything. Government should enforce property and morals laws, period. It might also build infrastructure, but private toll roads would be better, cheaper, faster, because government can't do anything right, unless it involves use of force, where government is so trustworthy that it ought to have unlimited power. Human beings are naturally selfish, so cherishing your inner selfishness is another word for freedom. And when you cherish your inner selfishness, you sure don't volunteer for any unpleasantness just to help the community!

ALL relationships in our brave new world are monetary. "Self-reliance" means doing it yourself or paying somebody else to do it. It doesn't mean working for the good of the whole community.

nihil obstet October 25, 2007 - 1:43pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.