Prison Brutality


Seems the BBC has a series coming out on US prison brutality -- not in Guantanmo, or Abu Ghraib, but in normal US prisons. I remember when the first Abu Ghraib pictures came out, I posted on BOP, an article entitled something along the lines of "US Finally Treats Iraqis Just Like Americans!" The BBC provides examples:

Savaged by dogs, Electrocuted With Cattle Prods, Burned By Toxic Chemicals, Does such barbaric abuse inside U.S. jails explain the horrors that were committed in Iraq?

They are just some of the victims of wholesale torture taking place inside the U.S. prison system that we uncovered during a four-month investigation for BBC Channel 4 . It’s terrible to watch some of the videos and realise that you’re not only seeing torture in action but, in the most extreme cases, you are witnessing young men dying.

The prison guards stand over their captives with electric cattle prods, stun guns, and dogs. Many of the prisoners have been ordered to strip naked. The guards are yelling abuse at them, ordering them to lie on the ground and crawl. ‘Crawl, motherf*****s, crawl.’

If a prisoner doesn’t drop to the ground fast enough, a guard kicks him or stamps on his back. There’s a high-pitched scream from one man as a dog clamps its teeth onto his lower leg.

Another prisoner has a broken ankle. He can’t crawl fast enough so a guard jabs a stun gun onto his buttocks. The jolt of electricity zaps through his naked flesh and genitals. For hours afterwards his whole body shakes.

Lines of men are now slithering across the floor of the cellblock while the guards stand over them shouting, prodding and kicking.

Second by second, their humiliation is captured on a video camera by one of the guards.

The images of abuse and brutality he records are horrifyingly familiar. These were exactly the kind of pictures from inside Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad that shocked the world this time last year.

Now none of this stuff is unusual in the world, or in world history. When I googled for "prison brutality", Uzbekistan came up right along with the US on the first page.

Uzbekistan...

See, the thing is that what happened in Abu Ghraib and Guantanmo is not surprising. It is the export of civilian practices in prisons into the military. Maybe it goes slightly further, but it doesn't go that much further. The US attitude towards towards convicts (and indeed, even towards people accused but not actually convicted) is that they deserve whatever they get.

My response to this is to say "fine. If you think they deserve to be raped and tortured, put it back on the books. Have the judges say, you John Smith, are hereby found guilty of snorting some cocaine. You are sentenced to 5 years in prison, and you shall be raped no less than five times. Electricity shall be applied to your testicles on no less than three occasions. You will be strapped to a metal restraint for no less than 3 days, at least 10 times and forced to defecate upon yourself for the duration. You will also spend at least 3 months in solitary. Be greatful that we are not making you pay your debt to society by releasing the hounds on you, sir, that we will spare you, since you were involved in no violence".

But in many jurisdictions of the US, the judge might as well be, because many of those things will happen to prisoners. You send a certain type of man or woman (pretty, not tough or connected) to a maximum security prison and the odds of them being raped are so close to 100% that there is no effective difference.

And it's this casual contempt, not for the rights of other humans, but for their essential humanity; this inability to put ourselves in anothers shoes, to treat even the worst (and many are far from the worst) among us with dignity, respect and reasonable kindness and forebearance which the US has displayed to the world. The world, rightly, is disgusted and the effect has been a real loss of American prestige. These things aren't just niceties; aren't just frills - a decent respect for humanity buys you a lot of leverage; buys you respect, helps you get your way. Those who preach about democracy, human rights and freedom are expected to live up to those words.

These prisoners are not caught up in a war zone. They are Americans, and the video comes from inside a prison in Texas

They are just some of the victims of wholesale torture taking place inside the U.S. prison system that we uncovered during a four-month investigation for Channel 4 that will be broadcast next week.

Our findings were not based on rumour or suspicion. They were based on solid evidence, chiefly videotapes that we collected from all over the U.S.

In many American states, prison regulations demand that any ‘use of force operation’, such as searching cells for drugs, must be filmed by a guard.

The theory is that the tapes will show proper procedure was followed and that no excessive force was used. In fact, many of them record the exact opposite.

Each tape provides a shocking insight into the reality of life inside the U.S. prison system – a reality that sits very uncomfortably with President Bush’s commitment to the battle for freedom and democracy against the forces of tyranny and oppression.

In fact, the Texas episode outlined above dates from 1996, when Bush was state Governor.

Frank Carlson was one of the lawyers who fought a compensation battle on behalf of the victims. I asked him about his reaction when the Abu Ghraib scandal broke last year and U.S. politicians rushed to express their astonishment and disgust that such abuses could happen at the hands of American guards.

‘I thought: “What hypocrisy,” Carlson told me. ‘Because they know we do it here every day.’

All the lawyers I spoke to during our investigations shared Carlson’s belief that Abu Ghraib, far from being the work of a few rogue individuals, was simply the export of the worst practices that take place in the domestic prison system all the time. They pointed to the mountain of files stacked on their desks, on the floor, in their office corridors – endless stories of appalling, sadistic treatment inside America’s own prisons.

Many of the tapes we’ve collected are several years old. That’s because they only surface when determined lawyers prise them out of reluctant state prison departments during protracted lawsuits.

But for every ‘historical’ tape we collected, we also found a more recent story. What you see on the tape is still happening daily.

The "tough man macho" bullshit has got to stop. It doesn't mean being strong, it means being a bully. The US blows into countries it thinks it can beat, but tiptoes around places like North Korea who could bloody its nose. Prison guards beat prisoners who have no way of fighting back, who are nobodies and helpless, then cover it up. People make jokes about rape all the time (an indication that they fear it), but no one does a thing about it. Meanwhile the US locks up more people per capita than any other nation in the world - beating out totalitarian states like China.

The entire process has been largely privatized, with prisoners held to make a profit. Entire rural communities have as their primary industry a local prison. To put it crudely, white rural men get paid to lock up urban black men. The industry is so powerful that no one wants to take it on - not just because the corporations have influence, but because the prison guard unions will savage any politician who suggests reform of either the prisons themselves, or the insane system of laws which has lead to such a massive prison population.

As with so much in the US, everyone with any sense (which means a lot less people than one would hope) knows this is FUBAR, but because people are making so much money for doing work that shouldn't even be needed (like the 20% to 30% administrative overheads in health insurnace companies) no one deals with it.

And so people suffer; people are raped; people die - all because some greedy people want to make money off the public teat doing what they enjoy - abusing blacks and poor whites who get caught up in the system.

One of the few good things that can be said about the oncoming collaps of the US economy is that it's going to force people to look really closely at things like this and decide if they're really willing to pay billions and billions for a system like this.


Addendum courtesy of Tina. For the record, I don't think this matters much. A man may be a mass murderer, I still don't believe in torturing him. Something about not becoming a monster yourself. However, for the record:

"Contrary to the public perception that the incarceration of violent offenders has driven America's prison growth, the [Justice Policy] Institute found that 77% of the growth in intake to America's state and federal prisons. between 1978 and 1996 was accounted for by nonviolent offenders. According to data collected by the United States Justice Department, from 1978 to 1996, the number of violent offenders entering our nation's prisons doubled (from 43,733 to 98,672 inmates); the number of nonviolent offenders tripled (from 83,721 to 261,796 inmates) and the number of drug offenders increased seven-fold (from 14,241 to 114,071 inmates). Justice Department surveys show that 52.7% of state prison inmates, 73.7% of jail inmates, and 87.6% of federal inmates were imprisoned for offenses which involved neither harm, nor the threat of harm, to a victim. Based on this data, we estimate that by the end of 1998, there were 440,088 nonviolent jail inmates, 639,280 nonviolent state prison inmates, and 106,090 nonviolent federal prisoners locked up in America, for a total 1,185,458 nonviolent prisoners." To read the report by Daniel Maccallair entitled America's One-Million Nonviolent Prisoners, where from this quote was taken, click here.

http://library.thinkquest.org/06aug/00342/The%20Prison%20System.html

lso:
http://prorev.com/2007/10/sorry-facts-on-us-prisons.html


Ian Welsh October 11, 2007 - 11:00am
( categories: Human Rights )

Ah Ian. It warms my heart to see what compassion that you have for all the rapists, murderers, pedophiles, drug dealers and in general the scumbags of America. Thank you for your helping me realize that they are just victims of the system.

allieboy October 11, 2007 - 11:09am

you approve of rape and torture in your name. You'll be agitating for judges to start handing out beatings, restraint time, rape, electrical torture and so on starting immediately, in line with your beliefs, I'm sure. Because, after all, they "deserve" it and if they "deserve" it, then hey, why not make it official? You don't mind agitating for your beliefs do you? Why don't you tell everyone you know in real life "what I think is needed in jails is more torture and more rape. Because being thrown in jail because you toked up means you're a scumbag who deserves it."

"Cruel and unusual", because they "deserve" it.

Say, anyone know what percentage of all prisoners are in because of non-violent offenses? Anyone wonder why the US imprisons multiple times the number of people that every other Western nation does? Anyone think through what that means?

And anyone, other than allieboy, morality impaired enough to argue for torture and rape in the prisons, even of violent offenders? Think that if you assaulted someone you should be locked down to a steel chair and forced to shit yourself for days on end, bitten by dogs, raped and so on? Even for the worst prisoners, you really want to argue that (forget all the people in prison who did nothing violent, or who harmed very few people; of which there are plenty.) Go on, let it all hang out, show what you're really made of -- what you really believe.

Ian Welsh October 11, 2007 - 11:22am

Damn, Ian--you beat me to it.

The fact our prison systems will not be open and up-front about actual practices ought to be a clue that people like allieboy ought to be ashamed of what goes on there. But allieboy doesn't get the hint--he's proud! If there is nothing to be ashamed of, then why do our prisons have to lie about what they do?

The reason we should care is because the person winding up in prison might be you or your loved ones. Innocence is no protection against wrongful conviction.

Mr. Flibble October 11, 2007 - 11:36am

Allieboy and people like him scare and repulse me, morality impaired indeed.

Caribdude October 11, 2007 - 12:06pm

... in a similar fashion. Its the same mindset that thinks 'cappin' Haji's' in Iraq for sport is OK, that turning Iran into a field of glass would be cool, etc. Not all come to these thoughts, perhaps merely through lack of imagination that appears so evident, but it comes from the same place, IMO. "I don't know you, so give me a reason to hate you and I'll cruelly oblige."

ww October 11, 2007 - 12:25pm

"According to a new report from The Sentencing Project, drug arrests have more than tripled in the last 25 years, to a record 1.8 million arrests in 2005. The so-called war on drugs has pushed the number of incarcerated drug offenders up by 1,100 percent since 1980."

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/sep2007/pris-s29.shtml

jtruett October 11, 2007 - 11:33am

Imagine if all the druggies woke up sober one morning and said, hey, where's my job, my health care, my education, my "part" in the American dream? There'd be a bloody insurrection. Where exactly would those 1.8 million folks arrested in 2005 alone be employed? And what about the million to two million per year thrown in jail? Somebody's making a lot of dough from the "war on drugs" -- and it's not just the drug pushers.

bluespeak October 11, 2007 - 7:26pm

It amazes me how the "Culture of Life" folks support the dignity of human life only when the life in question is "white" AND ("fetus" OR "wealthy").

You know exactly what Ian's addressing here, and your comment shows how little you care to discuss the real points raised therein.



Turn back to the Constitution - and
READ it.

Rick October 11, 2007 - 11:40am

Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

We do not pay enough for prison guards. We do not properly train them. A culture of sadism has developed in the system. Some people are drawn to the system because they have been abused, may come from families where there has been a pattern of abuse handed down for generations, and they can play out their own abusive compulsions on prisoners.

The famous Stanford study demonstrated that students who described themselves as "liberals," typical of Stanford, began behaving like the guards at Dachau within 48 hours, in a simulated prison set up as an experiment, in response to what they saw as uncooperative behavior on the part of volunteer "prisoners." The experiment had to be brought to halt to prevent injury to the volunteer prisoners. So there is something inherently dysfunctional and sick about prisons as they presently function.

Finally, it is not the job of prison guards to devise punishments for the prisoners. They are there to protect prisoners from each other and to maintain prisoners in their incarceration. That's where their responsibilities end. But, as noted above, with many of the wrong people coming into the system, not properly trained and obviously not properly supervised, what you get is something worse than a medieval torture center.

Those who try to justify the behavior of the guards by pointing to the crimes of the prisoners need to examine their own motivations. It would seem that they have some inner rage that they feel the need to direct toward the incarcerated and are quick to condemn any who have sympathy for prisoners. It is wise to remember that we have a terrible history in this country of convicting the innocent just so law enforcement can demonstrate that it is doing something as the majority of crimes go unsolved.

Channing
Ventura CA USA

Powder Monkey October 11, 2007 - 11:34am

with remarkably little prisoner on prisoner and guard/prisoner, prisoner/guard violence. Not a lot in the US, but it is possible to do.

Part of the issue is that funds for things like libraries, education, rehabilitation, etc... have been cut to the bone - or ended entirely in many jurisdictions. You put people in prisons where they have nothing to do, and the few studies done show that they go nuts, and one of the ways they go nuts is that many of them start having uncontrollable fits of rage.

The people who adapt best to such places, ironically, are the genuine psychopaths. It's just a game for them, they don't "need" the social contact and they often become very adept at gaming the guards and the system.

When you don't treat humans with dignity, they start acting down to the way you treat them.

None of which is to say that running a prison is easy. There are a lot of bad, violent, anti-social people there and prison gangs, in particular, are very problematic. But really, in this day of 24/7 surveillance, there is no excuse for widespread violence - especially prisoner on prisoner violence, which, though I don't touch on it much, is worse in most prisons than anything the guards do.

Except, of course, that the guards know it's going on and tolerate it, heck often even encourage it, playing gangs and indivduals off against each other as a way of maintaining control.

The hidden message of a lot of these things is that the guards aren't really in control of a lot of prisons.

Ian Welsh October 11, 2007 - 12:41pm

I've been looking a little bit into this lately, trying to dig up reports available on the net, and there seems to be a consensus that Canadian prisons across the board are much more humane in their treatment of prisoners. Not perfect, of course, and I've seen my share of allegations of mistreatment, but they tend (usually) to be more along the lines of unfair administrative decisions rather than physical mistreatment.

I wonder, if this is true, what the explanations for the difference may be. I imagine the privatisation of prisons in the US is part of the problem, but it's also an easy target and I tend to be wary of that. Is it reflective of a broader difference in culture?

rumor October 11, 2007 - 5:00pm

I have to agree with what you say about a culture of sadism developing, and the experience of abuse and other reasons that cause guards to abuse others. And it's true that in most states prison guards are not very well paid at all, and therefore come from segments of the population that have a lot of reasons to be bitter and angry.

But in California, the prison guards union is very, very strong, one of the strongest of the state employees unions. And they are very well paid indeed. Most of them make more than teachers, policemen or other public servants, even though they have very little education or skills. Ten percent or more of them in fact take home more than $100,000 a year! That's a lot.

By the way, this BBC report came out a couple of years ago, and Amnesty International has issued numerous reports on it over the past decades. Glad to see it's finally getting some publicity, but I wonder why it's been covered up for so long. The video in the article linked here is quite shocking. Above all, it indicates how widespread the problem is, and the fact that it's not just a few angry guards who are doing it. It's a systematic policy, and one instigated at the direction of the people running the prisons. It's a deliberate policy aimed at keeping poor people and people of color in line. It works very well too.

jonbrown October 11, 2007 - 3:13pm

allieboy and his ilk are not alone.

Bill O'Reilly had this to say about what to expect from an "ultra left-wing" John Edwards presidency,

Remember, no coerced interrogation, civilian lawyers in courts for captured overseas terrorists, no branding the Iranian guards terrorists, and no phone surveillance without a specific warrant.

"Talking Points" believes most Americans reject that foolishness.

I take O'Reilly seriously only because I know there are millions of Americans out there who agree with this, what could only be called, a growing fascist ideology. I sure hope he's wrong in his assumption that most Americans reject basic human rights and the rule of law. But there sure are enough of them.

stuart noble October 11, 2007 - 12:33pm

9. # The U.S. nonviolent prisoner population is larger than the combined populations of Wyoming and Alaska.
.
Source: John Irwin, Ph. D., Vincent Schiraldi, and Jason Ziedenberg, America's One Million Nonviolent Prisoners (Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute, 1999), pg. 4.

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

Tina October 11, 2007 - 12:47pm

In terms of prison brutality, one of the nastiest aspects is related to the way prisoners are allowed to treat other prisoners. Rape and violence are routinely accepted and nothing is done to stop it. On the contrary, the guards may use it as a control mechanism. Is it any wonder that AIDS infection rates are huge in prisons. Brutality of this sort is unacceptable but not discussed precisely because no one wants to be seen as soft on people who violated the law. Can't we be tough on crime without sanctioning rape and daily beatings?

David Lublin October 11, 2007 - 2:32pm

Addressing social problems through the criminal justice system is no better than addressing political problems through the criminal justice system. It's the modus operandi of repressive states. A state that locks up as many members of its own citizenry as the U.S. is making war on its own citizens. The first reformation that we need is to reduce the prison population radically. Kinder, gentler ways of removing freedom may be preferable, but they're still about mis-defining justice, and are a gateway to abuse.

A prison sentence is a failure of a free society, a last resort for those who endanger others. As long as it's about who deserves being locked up, it will be inhumane. The powerless will be brutalized and the powerful will be immune.

Of course, I'd like to see one more person in prison -- Scooter Libby. Just to try to get the powerful to worry about how a brutal, inhumane system might apply to them.

nihil obstet October 11, 2007 - 3:07pm

What's very weird here is how the internal systems of rationality settle in. For example in Nazi camps, internal clandestine economies and pecking orders evolved from an unprecedented chaotic environment. The whole Nazi regime was a spaghetti mess of sadomasochistic lines of authority.

Right before I got out of college i got arrested, saw how they (white guy) gratuitously kicked a (black) guy around the corner from the cameras. Worth noting was how jail sheriff's deputy staff typically aren't sharp enough to pass city police training.

Finally it is very important to see (again a Holocaust comparison easily here) how the system is designed to suck money out of human souls. it is not a 'waste of money,' it's a redirection dubbed the variously the prison-industrial complex, the negative-return-on-investment economy, or the tapeworm economy. Eliminate civil rights and suck out the labor/time. Blowing out human capital for short term profit. Of course with the drug dealers and whatnot, most of that cash ends up with corporations (a good chunk of whom own the Federal Reserve, but that's another can of worms altogether).

Spot on with the prison unions as a negative force counting on the negative-ROI structure to keep the deteriorating economy alive. Google "Katherine Austin Fitts / Narcodollars for Beginners" for that whole capital loop....

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong October 12, 2007 - 1:32am

This documentary was produced and broadcast by Channel 4, which is not part of the BBC. Channel 4 is another public service broadcaster in the UK which is a rival of the BBC.

hapkido October 12, 2007 - 4:59am

they meant to say British Broadcasting Channel 4, as opposed to British Broadcasting Corporation.

Tina October 12, 2007 - 5:30am

As a publisher-broadcaster, Channel 4 does not produce its own programmes but commissions them from more than 300 independent production companies across the UK, a far greater number than any other broadcaster, including the whole of the BBC. It works very closely with the independent production sector, and invests heavily in training and talent development throughout the industry.

The Channel 4 service was originally established under the Broadcasting Act 1981 and was provided for by the Independent Broadcasting Authority. The Channel Four Television Corporation was subsequently established under the Broadcasting Act 1990 and the Channel's functions were transferred over to the new Corporation in 1993. The Corporation's board is appointed by OFCOM in agreement with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.
http://www.channel4.com/about4/overview.html

Torture Inc. was produced by ORTV, for Channel 4 Dispatches.

And finally there is a digital/cable section of BBC called BBC 4 which has probably confused the matter even more.

Graham October 12, 2007 - 7:45am

as the final part of a four episode series
on March 2, 2005.

http://www.channel4.com/news/microsites/T/torture/cases.html

Graham October 12, 2007 - 8:14am

What we should really do is test all 4 year olds and identify the criminals then and start the incarceration early. This would be much better as the children that need to be left behind would be left behind in prison where they belong.
Now take someone like allieboy...whoever would choose a name like that should really belong in prison...and probably for life. I mean, do some free association...allieboy...sounds like a gay pederast hooker to me. Why bother with the trial? He might even have benefited by an early incarceration policy.
Or better yet...let's just emulate China. Trial at 10AM, guilty verdict at noon...break for lunch and appeal...bullet thru the head by the river at 2pm...remove saleable organs and place on ice 215pm...body to protein recyclers at 230pm unless family comes and pays expenses.
The income derived from above can be used to buy new tasers for 100K per annum prison guards.
Better, safer living in a lock America.
Watch out for the traitor next door.

JT October 12, 2007 - 10:49am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.