Big Brother's On the March


In China:

Starting this month in a port neighborhood and then spreading across Shenzhen, a city of 12.4 million people, residency cards fitted with powerful computer chips programmed by the same company will be issued to most citizens.

Data on the chip will include not just the citizen’s name and address but also work history, educational background, religion, ethnicity, police record, medical insurance status and landlord’s phone number. Even personal reproductive history will be included, for enforcement of China’s controversial “one child” policy. Plans are being studied to add credit histories, subway travel payments and small purchases charged to the card.

The article also discusses the use of cameras with face recognition systems. The company putting together the ID is, of course, American. New York is vastly expanding its use of cameras. The British have so many cameras that their own privacy comissioner has said they are a "surveillance state" and they have considered adding listening devices to the cameras.

I'm going to stake out the position of liberty on these issues - with only a few exceptions I don't believe in cameras in the commons. I also don't believe in universal ID cards at all - they are the first step to a totalitarian state and no state which requires people to carry and show ID to police on demand can be considered a free state. I also don't believe in "no work lists", which despite the defeat of the immigration bill, continues on, and continues to not allow much appeal to the courts for damages when they get it wrong.

In fact, in the American context, the employment verification system is the wedge into universal id, since it is moving towards storing pictures and biometric data. Soon enough you won't be able to work if the government doesn't like you - I mean, I sure trust the people who run the no-fly list, a list with nuns on it, retired colonels on it, and so on, to run a "no work" list. I'm sure it would never, ever, be used for political purposes.

Oh, and about that bridge. You really need it, and I have a bridge in Manhattan that's suprisingly affordable. Let's talk.


Ian Welsh August 14, 2007 - 7:52pm
( categories: Miscellany )

except maybe the cameras--I'm sort of on the fence about cameras in public places. It really comes down to who controls the cameras, who has access to their footage, and who doesn't. If only the government is privy to the images, then its definitely a bad thing. But if these cameras are publically accessible to anyone with an internet connection... that would probably be fine by me.

With the way cell phones are going right now, everyone is going to be carrying their own personal video camera out in public at all times soon enough.

Bolo August 14, 2007 - 8:05pm

Too late, we already live in a surveillance state.

Every time you use your cell phone, someone knows were you are, every time you use a credit or debit card someone is watching, every time you go through easy-pass some one records your location, even your subway card records your subway usage, if your car has the OnStar system someone knows where you are, and within a few years Insurance companies are going to insist that your car has a black box.

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives. John Stuart Mill

Don Quijote August 14, 2007 - 8:51pm

do matter. That said, I don't entirely disagree.

There's a reason I use cash for almost everything I'm still allowed to.

Ian Welsh August 14, 2007 - 9:00pm

because I use a card for everything I can to get the miles. Most of my and my family's personal air travel has been "free" as a consequence. An added advantage is that you can prove where you were at a certain time which can eliminate the possibility that you were at the scene of the crime.


“I despise idealogues masquerading as objective journalists.” - Bill O'Reilly, March 30, 2007

Mark August 14, 2007 - 9:15pm

WSJ - U.S. to Expand Domestic Use Of Spy Satellites

The decision, made three months ago by Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, places for the first time some of the U.S.'s most powerful intelligence-gathering tools at the disposal of domestic security officials. The move was authorized in a May 25 memo sent to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff asking his department to facilitate access to the spy network on behalf of civilian agencies and law enforcement.

Sometime next year, officials will examine how the satellites can aid federal and local law-enforcement agencies, covering both criminal and civil law. The department is still working on determining how it will engage law enforcement officials and what kind of support it will give them.

Welcome to 1984...

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives. John Stuart Mill

Don Quijote August 16, 2007 - 6:24am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.