And the Angels Wept, And the Holy Land Was Washed In Blood


Hat tip Taylor Marsh, Hamas's statement on the Gaza seizure:

The events in Gaza over the last few days have been described in the West as a coup. In essence, they have been the opposite. Eighteen months ago, our Hamas Party won the Palestinian parliamentary elections and entered office under Prime Minister Ismail Haniya but never received the handover of real power from Fatah, the losing party. The Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, has now tried to replace the winning Hamas government with one of his own, returning Fatah to power while many of our elected members of Parliament languish in Israeli jails. That is the real coup. ... ..

If Israel were to pull out of the West Bank, Hamas would wind up ruling there as well. It's really this simple - Fatah has turned into Vichy - they are helping an occupying power against their own people. And they're gutless - Fatah leaders fled Gaza at the beginning of the fighting, and left their footsoldiers to die on their own.

And any fair observer would have to agree that the way Hamas sees it is essentially correct. They won the election - and they weren't allowed to form the government.

Unfortunately, while this has been a bit of a wake up call, and some aid will start flowing into the West Bank in an attempt to prop up Fatah, the fundamental lesson hasn't been learnt - that elections should be respected, and that you should negotiate with the people who have the consent of the people. Which, in this case, would be Hamas.

But then there's no real reason to think that Israel wants negotiations with anyone who could actually make peace (Fatah sure as hell can't.) Ever since Oslo all they've done is drag the process out so they could put down more settlements, creating facts on the ground. The one Israeli PM who looked like he might stop the settlers was assassinated. Then Sharon provoked an uprising in order to bring himself to power.

But when Sharon was felled by God, it all went to hell. Sharon had been moving towards the endgame - to get as big an Israel as he could, and to make a deal with the Palestinians when Israel was strongest and Palestine weakest - but Sharon would have been willing to really gore the settlers in the West Bank. Olmert, with his odd combination of belligerence, incompetence and essential cowardice, seems to feel that he can't do that.

And so Olmert and his succesors will doom Israel. Simple demographic facts indicate that if Israel doesn't either ethnically cleanse out the Palestinians, or give them a state, that eventually Palestinians will be a majority - locked up in their Bantustans, denied the vote, equality or economic unity. The charge that Carter leveled against Israel - that is an apartheid state, will be undeniable, as will the fact that it is an apartheid state based on religious identity, where one religion opresses the other.

And the end result will be a "one state solution". With Jews a decided minority, Israel as a "Jewish State" will end.

It doesn't seem like many religious states - whether Christian, Muslim, Jewish, or any other, are anything but an excuse for the opression of those of other religions.

I grew up with the Israel of "Exodus". I thrilled to the small country fighting off its enemies. But that Israel, which was never quite what I thought it was, is dead. Men like Sharon and Olmert, and especially Israel's own religious right, and thuggish settlers, have killed it. By wanting everything on their terms, and nothing on the Palestinian's terms - by thinking only in the language of force "we are more powerful, so they have to give us what we want", they have betrayed their own people and the dream of Israel itself as a Jewish state.

It is a sad thing to say about a country based on a faith, one of whose Rabbi's once summed up as "love thy neighbour. All else is commentary."

And the angels weep and their tears water the holy land with blood.

Lord God in Heaven, save us from those who claim to act in your name but who know you not.


Ian Welsh June 21, 2007 - 12:28am
( categories: Miscellany )

A Secular-Democratic State Solution

By OMAR BARGHOUTI

When I saw some of the images coming out of the infighting in Gaza last week, I suppressed my anguish and steaming anger, recalling the wise, almost prophetic, words of the great Brazilian educator, Paulo Freire, who wrote:

"The central problem is this: How can the oppressed, as divided, unauthentic beings, participate in developing the pedagogy of their liberation? Only as they discover themselves to be 'hosts' of the oppressor can they contribute to the midwifery of their liberating pedagogy. As long as they live in the duality in which to be is to be like, and to be like is to be like the oppressor, this contribution is impossible. The pedagogy of the oppressed is an instrument for their critical discovery that both they and their oppressors are manifestations of dehumanization."

Apparently, neither of the two warring factions succeeded in transcending the being "like the oppressor" part.

The lightening success of Hamas in forcefully taking over the supposed symbols of Palestinian power in Gaza cannot and ought not obscure the fact that, given the overbearing presence of Israel's military occupation, the bloody clash between the Islamist group and its secular counterpart, Fatah, and irrespective of motives, has descended into a feud between two slaves fighting over the crumbs thrown to them, whenever they behave, by their common colonial master.

There is no doubt that a faction within Fatah -- overtly funded, trained and steered by the US and Israel -- is the primary suspect behind the flare-up of this bloody internecine strife, which many observers view as a thinly veiled attempt to destabilize Hamas's democratically-elected government, coercing it into accepting Israeli dictates that it had so far balked from. Furthermore, any decent legal expert will readily admit that the so-called "emergency government," declared by the Palestinian Authority chairman, Mahmoud Abbas, in response to Hamas's take-over in Gaza, violates several articles in the Basic Law, the equivalent of the PA's constitution.
More at link

adrena June 21, 2007 - 7:18am

The local newspaper (owned by the Aspers) is currently running an 8 Part series on "One family's (holocaust) survival story". Yet, this paper has never published one article on the abject misery the Palestinians are subjected to on a daily basis. The arm of the Israeli propaganda machine is long and unrelenting.

adrena June 21, 2007 - 7:47am

From calamity to full-blown catastrophe in Palestine
By Rami G. Khouri

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Daily Star - [...] The Palestinian people are now divided into six distinct communities, located in Gaza, the West Bank, Arab East Jerusalem (under varying degrees of Israeli occupation and control), refugee camps throughout the Arab world, in Palestinian communities in the Middle East outside the camps, and in the global diaspora. This worsening fragmentation of the Palestinians is certain to lead to greater radicalization and more proficient resistance, which will spill over into other societies in the region, and perhaps globally. This trend has been consistent since 1948.

On its northern and southern Arab borders Israel today is flanked by two militant Arab movements - Hizbullah and Hamas - that combine powerful ideologies of religion, nationalism, resistance and self-assertion. Neither existed 25 years ago, but both have achieved power and prominence today. They are the natural consequences of Israel's perpetuating decades of attacks, dehumanizing occupations and brutal colonization against Palestinians, while the US and Europe fiddled and the Arabs napped.
[...]
The world erred when it refused to engage Hamas after its election victory last year, and again after the Hamas-Fatah unity government was formed earlier this year. One must be truly stupid, or brutally malicious, to repeat the same mistake a third time.

ww June 21, 2007 - 7:52am

we read this:

Former Hamas prisoners remember Fatah torture
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — They called it "The Bus" and it marked the beginning of days, weeks, even months of brutal interrogation at the hands of the nascent Palestinian government.

After being rounded up by Fatah forces, Hamas men were blindfolded and shackled to a line of uncomfortable, low chairs while their captors blasted "dirty" music to soften their psychological defenses.

Then, one by one, they were beaten, questioned and thrown in cells.

"Torture by the Israelis was less than what they did here," said Hassan, a 46-year-old high school physics teacher who would give only his first name. He said he was held by Fatah for 59 days in 1996.

For Hamas members, the gutted prison bloc in the back of the Gaza City headquarters of the Palestinian Authority's Preventive Security Service was their Abu Ghraib.

It was here that the seeds of the rivalry with Fatah were planted a decade ago. And it was here last week that Hamas broke the spirit of Fatah forces and sealed its military victory.
(much more)

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/17166.html

Condi's "moderates" in action.



“les Etats-unis, c’est le seul pays à être passé de la préhistoire à la décadence sans jamais connaitre la civilisation…”...Georges Clemenceau

barrisj redux June 21, 2007 - 11:24am

I'm so cynical about this situation I don't pay much attention to it - not as much as say, Iraq, where my country is directly involved and it's obvious we'll have to leave there soon (even though the new permanent military base is just the latest Saddam palace). So, from a tactical standpoint, what is the best solution for Israel - ethnic cleansing or giving the Palestinians a state now? Obviously the humane thing to do is to give them a state, but what option has the best chance of putting a foot down on the neck of this violence so it wouldn't break out again? Renegades can undermine peace deals.

Nominay June 21, 2007 - 11:24am

There is no non-ultra-violent way to stop the violence because it is not human nature to stop violence against occupiers (especially occupiers who rule awfully.)

Ethnic cleansing would certainly stop most of it (though not all). But be clear what that means - shove all Palestinians out of the West Bank. It would be a huge crime against humanity, and odds are that the Europeans, at least, would place Israel under a rigid embargo. It would destablize the neighbouring countries as well and would ensure that they would never recognize Israel (they have offered recently.)

They could also, say, kill 10% of the population then say "stop or we'll kill another 10%" and do that till it stops. That would work.

But no low level violence will stop it. The Palestinians can take it, they've proved that. All insurgencies always experience higher losses than the occupiers. And since Israel continues to expand settlements the provocations to violence continue to increase, not decrease.

Ian Welsh June 21, 2007 - 11:47am

Israel will deservedly never be secure.

adrena June 21, 2007 - 4:02pm

How long do you think Israel would continue to bully the region without USA money and weaponry? Cut off all US government support, ban private donations from Americans on the basis that Israel is a terrorist organization, and watch the problem go away.

The Israelis will never learn to behave as adults if they don't face the real consequences of behaving the way they now do.

chalo June 22, 2007 - 11:56am

Removal of US support in addition to trade sanctions should make Israel 'squirm'.

adrena June 22, 2007 - 1:16pm

...sounds like in a Palestinian political context:

Dahlan warns West Bank at risk of being overrun by Hamas

Avi Issacharoff | June 21

Ha`aretz - Fatah strongman Mohammad Dahlan on Tuesday warned that the West Bank was in danger of being overrun by Hamas, as his party decided to sever all ties with the Islamic group, a member of the group's central committee said.

In an interview with Reuters, Dahlan lashed out at Israel and the U.S. Earlier in the day, Dahlan branded Hamas' seizure of the Gaza Strip last week an "occupation."

"If serious reforms are not undertaken in the security forces it would be easy for Hamas to take over the West Bank," he said.

Now cut off from his base in Gaza and speaking to Reuters at an apartment in the West Bank city of Ramallah, he said, however, that the strength of Hamas and over Fatah's fighters was no surprise, despite Fatah's apparently greater numbers.

"Palestinian Authority Chariman Mahmoud Abbas' men lacked the Islamists' aggressive dedication to a clear goal," he said. He also accused the United States of failing to make good on pledges of support, and Israel of deliberately blocking arms supplies to help divide Palestinians into a Hamas-run Gaza Strip and Fatah-controlled West Bank.

Of the West Bank, he said: "It would be very easy for a few people who have a goal to succeed over a large army that does not have a goal and does not have proper weaponry."

[Comment: I don't buy this assessment - sounds a lot like an opportunistic plea for more toys. They got rolled over in Gaza because their people cut and ran, and they cut and ran because they had somewhere to run to. Not the case in the West Bank - they'd stand and fight, or they'd lose it all. Personally I tend to think that Hamas'd be real wise to sit and digest for a bit. More at the link, BTW. ~ JPD]

"Political Islam is a dream or a nightmare, but not a sociological reality." - Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah

JustPlainDave June 22, 2007 - 12:27pm

Always give an enemy a way out, eh?

You're probably right, but I think there probably is a morale problem as well. Mafias don't stand up well against people who really believe.

Ian Welsh June 22, 2007 - 3:33pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.