The Iranian 2003 Grand Offer


Nothing we didn't already know, but still heart-breaking:

Encouraged, Iran transmitted its “grand bargain” proposals to the U.S. One version was apparently a paraphrase by the Swiss ambassador in Tehran; that was published this year in The Washington Post.

But Iran also sent its own master text of the proposal to the State Department and, through an intermediary, to the White House. I’ve also posted that document, which Iran regards as the definitive one.
In the master document, Iran talks about ensuring “full transparency” and other measures to assure the U.S. that it will not develop nuclear weapons. Iran offers “active Iranian support for Iraqi stabilization.” Iran also contemplates an end to “any material support to Palestinian opposition groups” while pressuring Hamas “to stop violent actions against civilians within” Israel (though not the occupied territories). Iran would support the transition of Hezbollah to be a “mere political organization within Lebanon” and endorse the Saudi initiative calling for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Iran also demanded a lot, including “mutual respect,” abolition of sanctions, access to peaceful nuclear technology and a U.S. statement that Iran did not belong in the “axis of evil.” Many crucial issues, including verification of Iran’s nuclear program, needed to be hammered out. It’s not clear to me that a grand bargain was reachable, but it was definitely worth pursuing — and still is today.

Instead, Bush administration hard-liners aborted the process. Another round of talks had been scheduled for Geneva, and Ambassador Zarif showed up — but not the U.S. side. That undermined Iranian moderates.


Ian Welsh April 29, 2007 - 6:09pm
( categories: Iran )

Time and time again Iran has shown that it is a real country worthy of respect. It wants what other countries want and it is willing to negotiate to get it. There is no reason not to talk with them, this is just silliness...

Independant Media and Politics: www.theseminal.com

J-Ro April 29, 2007 - 10:02pm

there was a brief squib at the top-of-the-hour bulletin about Speaker Pelosi putting in for a visa to visit Iran. But an hour later, it was not repeated and I've been able to find nothing more about it.

Did anyone else catch this one?

Petronius April 30, 2007 - 12:42am

If true, all I can say is boy, she knows how to take a knife, stick it in the administration's guts, and slowllllyyyyy twisssstttt.

Ian Welsh April 30, 2007 - 2:09am

This reprise is just another exclamation point added to the cry for, bottom line, simply competent management in the White House. Simple competence, as the first prerequisite, should not be too much to ask.
Competence means that the new President builds a team of competent, independent thinking people around the Oval Office, constantly providing input where the President is the facilitator, listening to it all, sharing what he/she has learned with others, and then making the final decision and stating the reasons for the decision. The President must be a competent facilitator and manager, not some cowboy who sees running the country as just being given the access to the toys in the playroom.
Never again can ideologues of limited vision -- limited vision being a characteristic of ideologues -- be allowed to be in charge.
The authors of Bush's Brain point out that GW never was a success in business, moving successfully from one business to the next only because people, who happened to be friends of his father, recognized the wasted potential of the businesses and knew they could both please GHW Bush, favor GW and turn a profit through purchasing the company so GW could feel he had made a tidy profit and move on. We put a failed businessman in charge of the nation, a spoiled rich kid who bugged-out on his Texas Air National Guard responsibilities and then wanted to pilot a jet to land on the carrier -- something he had never done -- to proclaim "Mission Accomplished."
He wanted to be a cowboy hero, but the bottom line is that he's just a cowboy, a good ol' boy cowboy, and he should have stayed in Texas and just driven a Chevy around the ranch.

Channing
Ventura CA USA

Powder Monkey April 30, 2007 - 12:56pm

Rice will talk to Iran if seen as useful
30 Apr 2007 22:59:07 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Sue Pleming

WASHINGTON, April 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is ready to talk with Iran on the sidelines of meetings on Iraq this week but only if such contact is deemed useful, senior U.S. officials said on Monday.

A formal meeting has not been set up between Rice and Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki when they are in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh to discuss Iraq, but the top U.S. diplomat has made clear she would not avoid it.

"We are obviously prepared for whatever may emerge in terms of useful dialogue on Iraq," the State Department's Iraq coordinator, David Satterfield, told reporters.

.....

Another senior U.S. official, who asked not to be named because the issue is sensitive, said if the Iranians challenged Rice in a multilateral meeting about Iraqi border security, for example, she could at that point request private talks.

But he stressed the United States was not pushing Iran for bilateral talks and would not discuss Iran's nuclear dossier, which is being handled by the European Union's Javier Solana.

"We'll stop (the meeting) ... there is no doubt about it," said the official. "We would be undercutting our own position which is that we are willing to discuss all these things but only in the context of a suspension of uranium enrichment."

FIRM BUT POLITE

The United States accuses Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is to generate electricity and it has so far refused a Western offer of incentives and broad negotiations if it suspends its sensitive enrichment work.

President George W. Bush said if Rice bumped into her Iranian counterpart she would be polite but firm.

"She'll also be firm in reminding the representative of the Iranian government that there's a better way forward for the Iranian people than isolation," Bush said.

There will be two Iraq meetings in Sharm el-Sheikh -- one on Thursday to endorse the International Compact with Iraq, a five-year plan offering Iraq financial and political support in return for reforms.

Satterfield urged Iraq to agree on an oil-revenue sharing law that has been held up for months, saying this would help encourage foreign investment.

On Friday, Iraq's neighbors -- including Iran and Syria -- as well as ministers from the Group of Eight nations and the European Union will discuss how to stabilize Iraq, where sectarian violence has plunged the country into chaos.

...
more

Tina April 30, 2007 - 7:00pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.