The Drugging of America


Matt Stoller over at MyDD has up an article that is more than worth reading, on the rise of the American security state, the decline of the left and how it was destroyed right after WWII, and a number of other topics. One part of his excellent essay that I want to run with just a bit is this:

Like an organism, American adapted to this constitutional order. Highways sprawled outward, suburbs ate the landscape, cities died and were reborn, and American dotted the world with military bases. Education turned into a competition for credentials, a cultural war where the winners turned to legal drugs and the losers turned to illegal drugs upon which there was apparently a war. Wars on concepts actually became quite popular, often initiated by those from Texas. Democrats became the party of the status quo, Nixon criminalized politics, David Broder-esque pundit middle-managers infected discourse, TV became Geraldo-ified and the civil rights movement detached from its class-based origins and moved to a rights-based model even as black nationalists convulsed from within. The culture became lost in dreams and pain, addiction mainstreamed itself, a superwealthy class helped itself to everything, and young boys and girls adopted the role model of 'more'. The religion of America turned to anticommunism, which morphed nicely into anti-enlightenment and anti-reason. America today is full of promise, but this last fifty years has been ugly and full of spite. Better living through chemistry, baby.

One thread throughout this paragraph is the medicalization of Americans. It's something we're all aware of, sotto voce, but that we don't talk about much. But it has gone much further than most people realize. Let's take antidepressant drugs. In 2002 about 10% of women were on antidepressants and about 1/3rd of all visits by a woman to a doctor resulted in the prescription of an anti-depressant. From 94 to 04 the incidence of anti-depressant prescription during a doctor vist per hundred increased by over 100%, for both men and women. Meanwhile prescriptions for antidepressants for kids have been soaring as well.

And that's only one class of psychoactive drugs - we aren't talking about use of stimulants (for example Ritalin on kids); of drugs like valium (central nervous system depressants used for anxiety) and so on.

Maureen Dowd once observed that in the (admittedly high ranked) circles she travels in, she doesn't know any (other?) woman who isn't on some sort of psychoactive chemical.

One could observe that the effects of the drugs aren't always all that they're cracked up to be:

Startling enough, a study was recently published in the January issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry bearing strong evidence against the use of Paxil, a common antidepressant. Canadian neuroscientists found Paxil to have an 80 percent relapse rate after one year of use, while psychotherapy was found to have a 25 percent relapse rate. Children of all ages are uniquely sensitive to their environment. As a child's brain develops, it learns to cope with its environments and improve upon its social and learning skills.

Or one could observe that they have nasty side effects - like the loss of sexual desire, or for children, increased numbers of suicides.

Or one could suggest that even though they are useful for some people (who really are clinically depressed, as opposed to just unhappy, or who really do have something that might be called Attention deficit disorder rather than just having excess energy) that most of them are being prescribed by general practioners to such large numbers of people that it's highly unlikely they're being prescribed just to people who actually need them.

But the overall point is simple enough - a lot of Westerners seem to need psychoactive drugs to get through the day. We live in a courtier's society. You're supposed to be happy, and pleasant, all the bloody time. You're not supposed to be emotional - to have ups and downs. You're not supposed to get upset about things, to get angry, to get really sad. You're not supposed to be human. And your kids are expected to sit in a classroom for eight hours a day without making a fuss. (And we wonder why they keep getting fatter, too.)

A lot of people need something to take the edge off - to let them put up with the bullshit they have to tolerate every day. Or perhaps they need a pick-me-up; something to give them the energy to get through a 16 or 18 hour day in which they have to satisfy everyone.

There's no question that some people have messed up brain chemistry. But there are a couple of questions about what to do about it - whether drugs are the best way to deal with it (brain chemistry can and does change in response to non-drug therapies) and whether or not the majority of people, including children, who are getting these drugs, really need them.

There's nothing wrong with using pain killers to mask pain. But it's only masked, and if making the pain go away stops us from treating the underlying problem, then the pain medication is a bad thing, not a good one.

What is the underlying problem that so many people are using drugs to mask? Is it really that they are all just individually screwed up? Or is it a symptom of a bigger more societal problem?


Ian Welsh March 23, 2007 - 5:06pm
( categories: Miscellany )

be interested in what the women were prescribed the anti-depressents for. If you go to the doc around here and say you have trouble sleeping the first thing they try to give you is an anti-depressent.



the editor formerly known as candy

Tina March 23, 2007 - 6:24pm

kill me softly with drugs.

I digress
I'm still trying to get used to your name change. Actually, I've been thinking about changing mine. How about: Lady Omlette, Queen of Pants (or Skirts), Woman in the Middle, QuietAdrena, JustPlainAdrena or Justadoodle. I can't think of anything to replace Escher Sketch. But wait, what about VanGogh's Ear? Whaddaya think?

adrena March 23, 2007 - 6:48pm

Or for a different implication, "Van Gogh's Other Ear".

Escher Sketch March 23, 2007 - 7:43pm

An Escher by any other name would not an Escher be.

His winding staircase winds and having wound, winds on.....

Chickadee March 24, 2007 - 2:12pm

My experience indicates that most physicians would rather prescribe a drug than a lifestyle change. Perhaps it's because most Americans have a miserable track record on things such as stopping smoking, dieting and exercise.

And by using that prescription pad, many MDs are woefully ignorant about side effects and interactions and dosage, particularly with geriatric patients. It's not unusual when going through a deceased senior citizen's possessions to see shopping bags full of meds.

But many physicians, particularly those in managed care, are paid to keep a certain patient load and the most expedient way is to simply write some prescriptions.

Now, who'd like to write a piece on how we're also surgery-crazy for everything from a droopy rear to being unable to control one's food consumption?

Petronius March 23, 2007 - 7:05pm

I've written that piece, in part, a couple times. Americans do surgery at a far higher rate than any other nation - mostly because you get paid very well for doing surgery on someone.

Ian Welsh March 23, 2007 - 7:07pm

... assuming that this a general phenomenon affecting all Westerners. I think the uptake of anti-depressants and Ritalin is much lower in Germany for instance.

quax March 23, 2007 - 8:49pm

I actually did check, and the trendline seems to be quite standard, though there are some specifics that vary. German and Canada, for example, have lower kid anti-depressant growth rates, and the growth rate numbers can be very deceptive. (The UK has much lower rates of prescription of anti-depressants for kids, for example, but high growth rates.)

But in general the West as a whole seems to be increasing the rate of prescription psychoactive use at a very high clip.

Ian Welsh March 24, 2007 - 12:48am

My wife was prescribed anti-depressant drugs years ago. She took them for one week and she was worse.
These drugs as I see them are not for depression but for people who are loosing their sight for the future because of government and big business intervention in our lives.
When women could do their family jobs (I am not anti-feminist) and the husband could do the supporting is long gone.
My wife was raised to be the home caretaker. I was raised to be the home supporter.
That all went out the window over the years.
Now with this new economy we are both struggling just to make ends meet.
Give drugs to make the people happy.
This supports the drug companies and makes the government happy.
Everything costs more, big business makes more profit and we are left to struggle.
And if we aren't struggling enough they will raise our taxes.
And if this makes us more depressed they will sell us more drugs to make us poorer and the drug companies richer.
This has become a neverending circle.

repressive governments mix administrative clumsiness & inefficiency with authoritarian tendencies.

kimmy March 23, 2007 - 10:51pm

started anti-depressants this week because she talked to a friend who told her it helped her with her hot flashes and therefore her ability to get a good night's sleep. I have mixed emotions about that but she has gotten a good night's sleep most every night this week and that makes a world of difference in damn near everything. If it works it works I guess...


"I beseech you in the bowels of christ think it possible you may be mistaken."

Scott M March 23, 2007 - 11:35pm

Having suffered from significant insomnia at times I know where she's coming from, but anti-depressants are a shotgun approach for a specific problem. Which isn't to say that in her shoes I might not do the same.

However it would probably be wise to get off them after menopause is over and in the meantime to see if there's anything else that would help her sleep or control the hot flashes.

Ian Welsh March 24, 2007 - 12:52am

told me to try crushed ice when I get a hot flash or migraine. Works wonders most of the time. Ambien works better than any antidepressent for an occasional sleep helper.



the editor formerly known as candy

Tina March 24, 2007 - 2:18am

Have a sore throat/cold combo this week. Did a search on "sore throat cures" and one of the things that came up with was slippery elm bark and hot water. Seems it was prescribed until the 60's when it was removed from the standard pharmacopia. Since I have some in the house I gave it a try. Much to my surprise it really did reduce the pain significantly.

I wonder how many simple things like that and crushed ice we've pretty much lost.

Ian Welsh March 24, 2007 - 2:22am

pepper for sore throats, I figure it might be worth a shot next time. When I used to waitress we found a shot of blackberry brandy will numb the throat for a good hour and a half. :)



the editor formerly known as candy

Tina March 24, 2007 - 2:41am

if that doesn't work, several shots of blackberry brandy should numb just about everything. :)

Chickadee March 24, 2007 - 2:14pm

Male voice (medicine cabinet): What's wrong?
Man: I need something stronger.
Male voice (medicine cabinet): Take four red capsules. In 10 minutes, take two more. Help is on the way.

...

Female voice (medicine cabinet): If you feel you are not properly sedated, call 348-844 immediately. Failure to do so may result in prosecution for criminal drug evasion.

...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/quotes

Bolo March 24, 2007 - 1:52am

Several years ago, Prozac was the Penecillin of the era. I was prescribed that particular drug (the second one is now off limits due to over prescribing when I was a kid - it will literally kill me), and I took it for 2 weeks. Tossed it as I was sleeping 18 hours a day. The doctor said, "I guess that isn't the drug for you." D'oh He wanted to try other drugs, but I refused. I use homeopathy as much as possible.

Nearly every person in my life takes some form of antidepressant. Pain? Antidepressant (fibromyalgia patients are given elavil). Sleep? Antidepressant. Anger? Antidepressant. Headaches? Yeah - you got it. We are chemical-dependent, and it's no where near the fun enjoyed in the 60's and 70's. Considering that's when a lot of current day doctors were growing up, is there an underlying symptom for prescribing patterns? Or simply good marketing by drug companies?

KayseJ March 24, 2007 - 2:13am

The thing is, at least with traditional (ie. mostly illegal) drugs like pot and opiates and booze and cocaine, people have a good idea of how they're screwing themselves up. These new ones... we keep finding out the side effects.

And even with something like cocaine, when you look at how it was used traditionally (chewing coca leaves for the locals, and coca leaf infusions in drinks for westerners) it was far less harmful than the modern forms which came about after the traditional forms were banned. Or amphetamines, where modern speed is far more dangerous than the pure pharma stuff you could get otc in the 60's. I understand why they banned amphetamines (the stuff was killing a lot of people), but it seems like we can't get the balance right.

Ian Welsh March 24, 2007 - 2:49am

this medicalisation of our sorrows too.

I was in court mid-week and the registrar and I had a long chat about drug induced marriage breakups and the way side effects are not being acknowledged fully in the literature.

From where I stand I see the drugs creating marriage and family breakups that are fuelling the housing boom and allowing chinese imports to continue to sell...

But when everyone is living on their own and everyone owns all the whitegoods and tvs' etc that they can possibly use, what then?

graham March 24, 2007 - 2:55am

I just commented on your Part 2 post, but I wanted to respond to this one, too. While I lauded some of the benefits of antidepressants in my previous post, I really do think you have one very good point -- we live in a society where being consistently satisfied, engaged and happy is normalized and expected. This is profoundly strange. If you're lucky, things go about half well, half not-so-well. Even wonderful days are filled with a fantastic amount of fairly dull minutia. And some days aren't wonderful; many things in life are actually very painful. The contemporary United States is just really bad at normalizing everyday pain and suffering.

GiantDuck March 24, 2007 - 4:21am

In recent months, I've had to accept that reading news, blogs, and opinion on the internet is definitely depressing and limit time accordingly. I found myself staying in a chair in front of a screen far more than necessary; I'd suffer too many moments of anger and frustration as I read what our leaders are up to. Stupidity seems rampant, and the stress I suffered wasn't good for my general well-being; my blood pressure kept having spikes when I'd read someone like Coulter. Now that Ivins has passed, there is no one to offer humor along with the ugliness.

Sometimes, too much knowledge can kill you!

KayseJ March 24, 2007 - 11:38am

Hi All,
I think there is fault in the society as a whole. Patients want an instant fix, advertising makes people think they really need that drug, and Pharmaceuticals keep making their billions by maintaining illneses and not finding cures. Moss of thier manufacturing facilities are in PR, where a loophole in the tax law makes it possible to keep all their money in the pockets or in Congress lobying to hault any change that would eliminate the loophole.

When I wen to school there was no Ritalin, Concerta, etc....just a good old spanking....it works perfect!!!

Dangic March 24, 2007 - 12:16pm

"Americans have the most valuable urine in the world."
- medical school joke, at least 60 years old.

Antidepressants and similar drugs + therapy are five times more effective than either alone. Widely quoted number, I don't know the origin. Also, normally it takes 4-6 weeks for the stuff to really kick in. This is part of that whole quick-fix syndrome.

Prozac, the first one, has the unique problem of a 7-10 day plasma concentration raise & lower period. So if the stuff disagrees with you, you're in hell for up to a week. The other SSRIs all have one-three day periods.

There is a family of these damn things because of drug company competition and patents. The SSRIs have a common set of side effects that each person will only have a few of, and they are different for each drug for that person. This is why you want to shop around: other ones won't make you sleep 18 hours a day. If homeopathics work for you, that's great: they seem to have a "hit rate" (don't know the real term) where only 10% of the population will be affected by one mixture. 75% is the highest for the general run of prescription drugs.

There are other things besides SSRIs for the range of depressive symptoms. Note that bipolar and obsessive-compulsive disorders are also controlled with these drugs, and they are as common as chronic depressives. Many with one have another syndrome as well.

And, yes, hot flashes have recently been tied to neurotransmitter disruptions during menopause. It really will help.

The SSRIs are quickly prescribed because they're really safe, many are generic & cheap, and they really do help a wide variety of people with various problems.

I absolutely agree about the "courtier society". SMILE, DAMMIT!

Tonsure Wimple March 24, 2007 - 6:26pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.