Feingold on the Warner Resolution and on Ending Iraq.


I just got off a conference call with Senator Feingold. What he said was, essentially, the following:

1) There was a clear message in November, not that Americans didn't want a "surge", but that they wanted the war ended.

2) The Warner Resolution doesn't do this. It only stops the surge. It puts in no timeline. It has language which tries to stop the Senate from using the power of the purse to end the war. It actually mandates a surge in al-Anbar province (i.e. an escalation of the war.)

In fact, Feingold's take on the Warner resolution is that it is the moral equivalent of the original war resolution - Senators can try and say it was anti-war, but it's really a status quo bill that allows the war to continue, with nothing in it that attempts to bring the war to an end.

I am inclined to agree with Feingold that Democrats are making a mistake here. Americans voted to end the war. Democrats should be attempting to do that - not just to stop some surge. If they do not do so then they will be betraying their mandate and people will be quite justified in feeling that, at the end of the day, on the most important issue facing America, there's no real difference between the parties. They will also be justified in feeling that Democrats simply don't have the guts to face down George Bush, a President whose ratings are hovering slightly under 30%.

Feingold also argued that the best way to put pressure on Republicans is to have a clear bill that will end the war. At that point, with a clear up and down vote on a bill that matters, their own constituents will start applying the pressure. On a pre-compromised mess of pablum like Warner, the general public simply won't get worked up enough to apply significant pressure, and so the stalling can continue forever.

Feingold was right on the war. He was right on the Patriot Act (and the only Senator to have the guts to vote against that bill). I think he's right now, and that Senators who think he's wrong should think how much prouder they could be of themselves if on those key bills they had voted with Feingold.

I hope they'll do so now. The war needs to end. Americans are dying, literally, for nothing, for a war which can't, and won't, be won.

How Senators can look themselves in the mirror knowing that by not acting they are causing American soldiers to die, to die for a mistake, to die for nothing, is beyond me.

Feingold was right on the Patriot Act. He was right on the War. And he's right now. I hope that the other Democratic Senators, and eventually the Republicans, come to see that.

The war was a mistake.

A real man doesn't just admit he made a mistake; a real man fixes it.

Time for some Senators, including the women, to show what they are, or aren't, made of.

How many more soldiers have to die for their mistakes?


Ian Welsh February 5, 2007 - 7:20pm

Republicans block Iraq war debate

A US soldier inside an armoured vehicle in Baghdad (file photo)
Mr Bush plans to send 21,500 additional US troops to Iraq
A resolution opposing President George W Bush's decision to send extra troops to Iraq has failed to advance in the US Senate, dealing a blow to war critics.

The measure needed 60 votes before the 100-member Senate could begin debate, but it got 49, with 47 voting against.

Although non-binding, it was the first serious effort in Congress to confront the White House over the war in Iraq.

Since the US-led invasion in 2003, more than 3,000 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed.

The resolution opposed Mr Bush's plan to send 21,500 additional troops to Iraq, the majority of them to violence-hit Baghdad in an effort to end sectarian clashes.

It called on the White House to examine all other possibilities. Mr Bush has said it is something he has already done.

It was the first time Democrats had scheduled a fully-fledged debate on the Iraq war since they won control of Congress in last year's mid-term elections.

'Uncertain fate'

The text of the bipartisan, non-binding resolution was proposed by senior Republican John Warner

more
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6333707.stm

Tina February 5, 2007 - 7:39pm

Amen, and Hillary Clinton is reminding me of Nixon in '68 - being for the war now but promising to end it if we elect her. Fuck that. Feingold is right, as he always is, and it's a shame he's not running. I am part of his Progressive Patriots fund and I suggest anyone who's interested to sign up and join.

Nominay February 5, 2007 - 8:54pm

And Dems believe Dem voters are dumb ...

Dems are going to enable this war forever ...

All's they care is whether the blame gets hooked on them ...

I hope future events prove me wrong but that's how it squares up right now.

Douglas Watts February 5, 2007 - 10:13pm

on the ballot? Is it possible the net could persuade him to run for the Presidency?

The front running Dems are chickenshits that have sold out the trust of the 2006 voters. Hillary, Obama and Edwards do not deserve progressive support.

canuck February 5, 2007 - 11:02pm

Although I believe that Feingold might make a good president, he's expressed his reluctance to drag his family into a race, and said that he's still got work to do in the Senate.

Since the presidential campaign is apparently starting now, and the nature of U.S. campaigns lend credence to both of those as legitimate issues. Especially considering that Feingold's been divorced twice. Another concern is that Feingold's credentials as an executive are rather limited.

NateTG February 6, 2007 - 10:49am

One more thing, it's nice to hear from Feingold what I've believed for many weeks now - that both non binding resolutions like Warner's and being pro troop surge are two versions of the same status quo. What matters is making an honest and factual and practical case for ending this war and not giving Bush anymore money to conduct it.

Nominay February 5, 2007 - 11:12pm

And was disappointed when he said he wouldn't run. I think he's up there in potential good president material.

Carib

Caribdude February 6, 2007 - 1:05am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.