As the Lights Go Out On the City on The Hill.


I was thinking today of Oldman. For those who don't know, Oldman was an ex-Conservative who used to blog with myself, Stirling and Shaula at BOP News before he died, in his thirties, of the flu. He was one of the smartest guys I've ever met. Also one of the kindest. There's an old saw that runs "liberals love humanity, but hate people". Oldman was the opposite - he had boundless contempt for the mass of humanity, but endless patience and kindness for individuals.

One of his hot button issues was the Constitution. Oldman would put up with all sorts of crap, but he used to say he'd sworn to protect the Constitution and he was bloody well going to do so. I remember how when the first news of warrantless wiretapping leaked out just before he he died, he was livid, commenting that "the fourth amendmnent has apparently been repealed."

More after the jump.

I can only imagine his reaction to the current bill passing Congress. It's not the torture part that would outrage him, it's the fact that the bill lets the President designate citizens as enemy combatants. Once so designated they lose their constitutional protections and will face a military tribunal. As the LA Times points out, this isn't hypothetical, it was already done to Jose Padilla - who is held at the President's whim, now without any chance for a trail to clear his name, or at worst get a sentence and start serving it. He can't face his accusers, see the evidence against him, have a speedy trial (or any trial) - none of it. And the Supreme Court was ok with that.

This bill makes that formal. If you're considered an enemy combatant you're screwed. And if you're not American you won't even have a chance for a federal court to rule on whether you're a foreign combatant - you can be held in a gulag forever, with no judicial review.

This turns the US into a bannana republic. It makes it into a country of men, not laws and turns the President into damn near a dictator. He can already go to war without any oversight (by the time 60 days are over, you're at war) and now he can arrest people and hold them forever and torture them in the meantime.

Let's be frank - this is worse than the Patriot Act, by a couple orders of magnitude. The Patriot Act violated only a couple of the amendments, this takes out the entire bill of rights.

Whatever the cowardly political calculus going on here, it can't be emphasized enought that this is an historic bill that will be looked back on with disgust. Either it will eventually be repealed, in the way the Alien and Sedition Acts were repealed, in which case it will be a dark blot on America's history, or it will not be repealed, in which case it will be looked back on as the formal declaration that the American experiment in divided government and human rights was over. It is not an exageration in the least to say that if this bill passes and stays in force, that the America we knew, and that many of us loved, is dead. An America without Habeas Corpus, where the President can lock up people and have them tried in Kangaroo courts is not the America the Founders fought for and I will not defame their memory by pretending it is.

America, the shining city on the hill will be dead and a new one is born. You'll excuse me if I don't wish the new America good health or long life. May it die soon, with every man's hand raised against it, and no one to mourn iits passing..

And as for those who midwifed it, may their names be cursed for all eternity, their gravestones spat upon and their cowardice remembered as the poison it is. They have betrayed their country as thoroughly as a Benedict Arnold, striking at the heart of what makes America America.

I will mourn the old America. Perhaps it was not perfect, perhaps it was often full of injustice. But the dream of justice, the striving for freedom, was there. The ideals and the attempt to reach them commanded respect.

The new America seeks safety at the price of freedom, and as Ben Franklin noted it will receive neither. Nor will it deserve either.

And since Oldman isn't here to say any of this, I'll say it for him, even I can't say it in his style.

Rest in peace, my friend. I wish to hell you were here to help fight this, but at least you are spared having to watch it.

But I do know this - Oldman wouldn't give up if he were still here. He'd dig in for the long fight, to make this like the Alien and Sedition acts, and not the death toll of the Republic. And for my American friends that's all I can advise. America has often done the wrong thing, then done the right thing later. This can be one of those times. If this bill does past, for those who love freedom, and are loyal to the Constitution, not the King, let this be the beginning of a new fight for America's soul - not the end of America.


Ian Welsh September 28, 2006 - 12:10pm

Thank you for putting this so clearly, and so well.

hvd September 28, 2006 - 1:25pm

You've been on fire about this in the last few days and seem almost apologetic about it. I wouldn't be. Don't censor yourself if you've got more to write about it. You look around the blogosphere and you're hardly the only one. It struck me that, intentionally or not, this is serving as a "make-the-liberals-heads-explode" moment for the GOP. If they had wanted to pick a topic likely to demoralize Democrats and supress the vote, they could hardly have done better. The abortion battle, while still dreadfully important, has been going on so long that it's lost some of its ability to outrage. Maybe there's some fatigue there? But this torture thing is just a broadside out of nowhere (although I agree with various bloggers - yourself, digby/tristero, steve gilliard - that this is in fact an extension of a trend), psychologically.

Have you considered compiling the diaries written in the last week or so about this, into some sort of comprehensive document? There's a lot of angles and aspects (torture, habeas, electoral strategy, long term implications domestically and internationally, etc) to this bill. I'm not sure how exactly such a document might be used, or where, but the engineer in me can't resist the urge to compile information in a single place...

Anyway, thanks for keeping on this. It really is a watershed moment. I agree, absolutely, that if this is not repealed, it's going to be seen by history as the end of the American Experiment.

P.S. - I read American Sphinx, by Joseph Ellis (on Jefferson), recently. I found it telling and disturbing that, of all the Founding Fathers, Adams, while most optimistic about how long the American Expirement would last, still didn't give it more than 150 years at most. They were very aware that as time went on and generations became removed from the events that drove them, the lessons would be lost. One could argue about whether we actually made it to the 150 yr mark, or not, but with this no one will be arguing for 250...

dlmcelroy0 September 28, 2006 - 1:57pm

I expect I can still put my hands on his brother's email address. I suspect they would appreciate it.

Shaula Evans September 28, 2006 - 4:06pm

Maybe it's too late, but I just had this idea to stir this issue up and for people to make their outrage and condemnation of this law into a MSM item.

YouTube and Google Video.

I just watched a few videos after searching for torture and I came up with several interesting ones, not just TV clips but also people giving video opinions about it. The Powell objection to the law was the subject of one debate. There are also multiple videos of torture videos made by people, with music.

Anyway, my thought was, what if the blogosphere decided to flood both those video sites with these kind of videos, if not one you made yourself, then take someone elses and post it again. Just a flood, supported by ratings and comments.

I bet it would influence what was coming up in most popular and most recent, it would stir it up, it would probably make MSM news.

It's just a thought, if you think it's worth putting feelers out to other bloggers then take it and run with it. Maybe it's not so good, but it seems it at this moment. Drastic measures, unorthodox methods. Anything.....

Carib

Caribdude September 28, 2006 - 5:28pm

this will go to the Supreme Court, no doubt, and we have to keep screaming bloody murder until the thing is killed. continually until it's just a horrible memory.

*************************
If this were 1700, they'd be saying: "Since civilization began, slavery has existed. It's human nature." I would have believed it. If 1800: "Women will never vote. They are not born rational". I would have believed it.
2006: Make war irrelevant

bernadene September 28, 2006 - 8:24pm

Thank you for invoking Oldman, Ian. I, too, would have welcomed his voice in this hour of deepest gloom.

Ellen Dana Nagler September 28, 2006 - 6:53pm

i agree in spades.
this is something IMHO to go to the wall for. this is it, this is the big one, this separates the real people from the shills, cowards and moral cretins.

this is "he/she voted for the repeal of due process, habeas corpus and to allow torture" this should follow them around their neck for the rest of their days.
all the Rethugs and Dems who voted for this will be dogged and known by name by me until they are no longer in public office. for real.
************************************
If this were 1700, they'd be saying: "Since civilization began, slavery has existed. It's human nature." I would have believed it. If 1800: "Women will never vote. They are not born rational". I would have believed it.
2006: Make war irrelevant

bernadene September 28, 2006 - 8:18pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.