SearchUser loginNavigationCreate new accountTeam AgonistEditor in Chief: Steve Hynd ThoughtfulGlobalTimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Corner: Brian Downing's Picks: Numerian's Numbers: Who's onlineSyndicate |
Pan IslamismVia Thought Theater I come across this article:
An important point is the death of al-Zarqawi. See Zarqawi believe in sectarian warfare - Sunni vs Shia. Bin Laden and Zwahiri have generally championed pan-Islamism - that Shia and Sunni must work together to defeat the Crusaders. Bin Laden and Zarqawi had a sharp disagreement on this issue, but Zarqawi was both popular and in charge in Iraq (and a major reason why there's now a civil war, because he wouldn't stop attacking Shi'ites despite what appear to be unambiguous instructions to do so.) So when you hear rumours that Zarqawi was sold out by al-Q'aeda, this is probably why... It was time for Zarqawi to do one last service for al-Q'aeda - become a martyr and get out of the way of effective strategy, thanks. Hezbollah was really stealing al-Q'aeda's thunder and that meant they had to do something. Trying to attach their struggle to Hezbollah's is the smart thing to do from their point of view. I wonder if Hezbollah appreciates it, however - they have been very careful in the last few years to disavow terrorism against non Israeli targets. I would be surprised if they would change that strategy unless the US actually directly attacks them. Hezbollah wants legitimacy. Allying themselves with al-Q'aeda will deny them that and it's not something I can see them doing unless they feel they hae absolutely no other options. Ian Welsh July 28, 2006 - 9:28am
|
![]() Premium AdvertisingAgonist Page on FaceBookAgonist Facebook Activity |