Full Israeli Invasion of Southern Lebanon?


Stratfor thinks that Israel, who has called up their reserves, are going to move full into Lebanon and try and break Hezbollah. They reason that the US thinks this is in its interest; that from the Israeli point of view they need to the forward ground which is being used to launch rocket attacks; and that if Israeli troops are in danger of being kidnapped anyway, then they might as well put the troops out there in Lebanon and create a buffer zone to protect civilian Israel. They further argue that Israel believes that at this point they're going to be condemned no matter what by the international community and that if they're in for a penny, they're in for a pound - the consequences of condemnation are no more severe for invading Lebanon than for what they've already done.

(Excerpted from Stratfor's subscription newsletter)Moreover, an invasion of Hezbollah-held territory aligns Israel with the United States. U.S. intelligence has been extremely concerned about the growing activity of Hezbollah, and U.S. relations with Iran are not good. Lebanon is the center of gravity of Hezbollah, and the destruction of Hezbollah capabilities in Lebanon, particularly the command structure, would cripple Hezbollah operations globally in the near future. The United States would very much like to see that happen, but cannot do it itself. Moreover, an Israeli action would enrage the Islamic world, but it would also drive home the limits of Iranian power. Once again, Iran would have dropped Lebanon in the grease, and not been hurt itself. The lesson of Hezbollah would not be lost on the Iraqi Shia -- or so the Bush administration would hope.

Therefore, this is one Israeli action that benefits the United States, and thus helps the immediate situation as well as long-term geopolitical alignments. It realigns the United States and Israel. This also argues that any invasion must be devastating to Hezbollah. It must go deep. It must occupy temporarily. It must shatter Hezbollah.

At this point, the Israelis appear to be unrolling a war plan in this direction. They have blockaded the Lebanese coast. Israeli aircraft are attacking what air power there is in Lebanon, and have attacked Hezbollah and other key command-and-control infrastructure. It would follow that the Israelis will now concentrate on destroying Hezbollah -- and Lebanese -- communications capabilities and attacking munitions dumps, vehicle sites, rocket-storage areas and so forth.

Most important, Israel is calling up its reserves. This is never a symbolic gesture in Israel. All Israelis below middle age are in the reserves and mobilization is costly in every sense of the word. If the Israelis were planning a routine reprisal, they would not be mobilizing. But they are, which means they are planning to do substantially more than retributive airstrikes. The question is what their plan is.

Given the blockade and what appears to be the shape of the airstrikes, it seems to us at the moment the Israelis are planning to go fairly deep into Lebanon. The logical first step is a move to the Litani River in southern Lebanon. But given the missile attacks on Haifa, they will go farther, not only to attack launcher sites, but to get rid of weapons caches. This means a move deep into the Bekaa Valley, the seat of Hezbollah power and the location of plants and facilities. Such a penetration would leave Israeli forces' left flank open, so a move into Bekaa would likely be accompanied by attacks to the west. It would bring the Israelis close to Beirut again.

This leaves Israel's right flank exposed, and that exposure is to Syria. The Israeli doctrine is that leaving Syrian airpower intact while operating in Lebanon is dangerous. Therefore, Israel must at least be considering using its air force to attack Syrian facilities, unless it gets ironclad assurances the Syrians will not intervene in any way. Conversations are going on between Egypt and Syria, and we suspect this is the subject. But Israel would not necessarily object to the opportunity of eliminating Syrian air power as part of its operation, or if Syria chooses, going even further.

This is a giant geopolitical game of chicken. The assumptions underlying Israeli actions (and the US concurrence with them, which I must agree appears to be happening. Bush is basically giving the ok on all of this, at least publicly.)

1) They can defeat Hezbollah. Of course this is true in terms of battlefield victories. However Hezbollah will go into guerilla mode, and after the first few waves of targetting Hezbollah institutions and leaders, suddenly it will again become the classic insurgency game of guerillas amongst the population, and every strike against them simply increasing their support. Israel will have a lot of initial victories, but I doubt it can win a guerilla war in southern Lebanon, and once in it can't easily withdraw, since the enraged population will be behind using Lebanon as a launching pad for attacks on Israel.

2) Taking out Syria's air force won't trigger a reaction from Iran. It is entirely true that Iran cannot do much against Israel. It is, however, entirely capable of doing something against the US troops currently in Iraq and of driving oil prices sky high. This attack will be perceived in Iran as something the US greenlighted. Syria is an Iranian ally, and they have a defense pact. Iran may decide, entirely logically, that Israel is a US client state and that striking against the US is the best way to strike against Israel.

3) All of this won't trigger rage in Iraq, independent of what Iran does. I ain't so sure.

The other question is what is going on with China and Russia. There are indications that some sort of grand deal with them may have been reached to cut Iran loose. But I honestly can't imagine what Washington could offer Beijing and Moscow to do so in a scenario like the one above, because the entire Muslim world is going to be enraged by this. The good will lost by appearing to act on Washington's side is significant, and the good will gained by not following Washington's lead is low lying fruit.

Finally - the Neocons desperately want a war with Iran. They can't out and out declare one, but they can try and arrange one. They have very close ties to Olmert's faction in Israel. It is not unlikely that they are working together wil Olmert on this. Even granting that soldiers being captured is every parent's worst nightmare, it is hard not to see the Israeli response as disproportionate to suspect it was pre-planned - that the attacks were used to justify what Tel Aviv wanted to do anyway.

If Iran does react with acts of war to this - the Neocons get their war. If Iran doesn't, its two strongest regional allies - Hezbollah and Syria, are badly damaged and Iran is seen to have done nothing to protect its allies. If you're a Neocon, that's pretty much win/win.

We will see how this plays out over the next few days, and weeks, but this really is a case of playing with matches in an oil refinery, and who gets hurt by the ensuing explosion may not be exactly who the firebugs expect. Their constant, and continued assumption is that Iran won't dare to confront the US directly. If they are wrong on that assumption, the price will be a real war - not some pathetic war against a bunch of insurgents, but war against Iran, when US forces are pre-deployed in the worst possible fashion.

Stay tuned.


Ian Welsh July 13, 2006 - 9:27pm

...would be to hang around long enough for Hizbollah to be able to get its act together. I suspect that they're concerned about the massive amounts of materiel that's been moving into Southern Lebanon - if they're going in, I suspect they'll hit as much as they can, destroy as much infrastructure as they can and then pull back into Israel proper (hence the smashing of the bridges at chokepoints - pretty damned hard to hump a BM21 up and down those wadi slopes). They'll consider themselves to have bought some breathing room until someone else can effect regime change in Tehran. I'm not convinced that they'll move ground forces into the Bekaa - I wouldn't be surprised to see lots of air power backed up by Sayaret taking out point targets and gathering materials for int exploitation via helo insertions, but I don't know that they'll move major ground forces into the valley itself (that said, I would love to know if they've struck the road net to isolate the valley or not). I have a feeling that IDF thinking is that they've got an excuse to take out a looming threat from Hizbollah, but that there are dangers to going too far.

Were I in their shoes, I wouldn't launch a pre-emptive strike on the Syrian airforce. This isn't 1954 - current Israeli systems and pilots are good enough that anything the Syrians can put up will eat ordnance before it breaks ground effect. If I was going to get pre-emptive on them, I'd strike their airbases, same way that they hit Beirut (I'd also love to know what other strips they hit in Lebanon) - crater the airstrip and taxiways so no one can take off; strike their air defence net and bottle up their airpower rather than destroy it and risk broader Syrian involvement.

'course this speculation could be completely wrong, given that I'm hampered by an excess of rationality - guess we'll find out.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 13, 2006 - 11:16pm

I hope you're right Dave. And I fear, indeed that you have an excess of rationality - and that you don't have the same set of assumptions that Olmert is operating under.

One thing though - not staying in Lebanon means that Lebanon is again a staging base, and at that point Hezbollah really would have no compunctions. I could be wrong, but I don't think the breathing room would be long.

Or maybe Hezbollah would decide it's not worth it - in your scenario, they might. Hard for me to judge, not being on the ground. It could swing either way.

Ian Welsh July 13, 2006 - 11:25pm

For your claim that "massive" amounts of materielle are moving into Southern Lebanon?

I believe you are entirely mistaken about the length of time Israel must stay to make their "plan" work.

a) The kidnappers have no incentive to release the kidnapees, and are unlikely to be given any,
b) since it is unlikely that Hezbollah attacks will stop at _any_ time during the Israeli occupation, they will always
1) be "justified" in retaliating in Lebanon,
2) (by LBJ/Nixon/Bush mindset) be seen as "defeated" if they withdraw

JoshNarins July 14, 2006 - 8:45am

...is that there are some 12,000 Katyusha-type weapons in Hizbollah hands. Google search demonstrating that here. There are reports (and apparent evidence in Haifa!) that this arsenal includes some advanced long range types. Google search demonstrating that here (look particularly at the second link). You may disagree that this constitutes "massive" amounts of materiel - if this is less than massive, what would massive look like?

As to my assertion that the IDF will hit and pull back, frankly I think they're going to get all that they're going to get accomplished pretty early in the campaign. If they stay and try to hold territory they'll be putting themselves within reach of Hizbollah, probably the best group around for IED attacks. I think they aren't that stupid.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 14, 2006 - 9:30am

FACTBOX-Where will Israel's Lebanon offensive lead?

[snip]

HOW LONG WILL IT LAST?
.
Israeli commanders say it is not a question of days. They are planning for an operation lasting weeks or months.

[snip]
reuters

Tina July 14, 2006 - 9:37am

...weeks of ground forces involvement. Any more than that and I think Hizbollah's going to start inflicting heavier casualties. Regardless of the specific length of time the operation lasts, I don't see this one as a permanent occupation like the 80's and 90's.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 14, 2006 - 9:41am

It's often hard to get out. You think you're in for just a while. But you haven't quit pacified the area yet, so you fee like you have to stay. I doubt Israel intended to stay as long as it did last time it invaded Lebanon.

Still, you may be right. I hope you are.

Ian Welsh July 14, 2006 - 12:35pm

What baffles me is why Israel isnt using some sort of auto-targeting unit. If I remember correctly, back in the 90s someone made a radar unit that would track ballistic projectiles, backtrack thier launch point, and automatically dump the info to a semi-automated artillery battery.

I dont recall the name, but it cant be terribly complicated.

Trying to send the airforce out to catch cheap, mobile nebelwerfers isnt a winning deal.

Mad Dog

MadDog July 14, 2006 - 8:33pm

...use counter-battery radars, it's just that even when you're using one the response cycle isn't fast enough to snag competent oppo reliably. Most of the time you pound sand or kill civvies.

Quickest possible response time is on the order of a small number (2-5) of minutes, given the flight time of the munitions involved. Unless you're going to work over the entire grid square with the whole battery, the bad guys'll be gone. Add even one or two layers of oversight and you're well outside the zone where the tactic's likely to bear much fruit.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 14, 2006 - 10:43pm

Its still 2-5 minutes ? Thats pretty long for a computation that should take a few seconds. Granted, you have to have the human element involved on the fire/no-fire decision, but 2-5 minutes seems like an awfully long time. Still, its been a long time since I read the article in Armada magazine.

Even then, 2-5 minutes has to be faster than getting a plane in the air and hitting the launch site.

I will have to ask a few friends who served in artillery what the typical counter-battery time is supposed to be for tube artillery.

Mad Dog

MadDog July 15, 2006 - 2:59pm

...and the loading and laying of the guns. Sure you can figure out where the enemy fire originated in seconds, but getting steel on target takes a significantly longer time.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 15, 2006 - 3:17pm

I tend to agree. The goals of this incursion seem to be to make Hizballa pay significantly in infrastructure, possibly Lebanese political clout, and if they are lucky in their command structure. It would be nice if they rescued the soldiers, but they will probably be executed before that is possible.

I think Israel learned its lessons from 1982 and are not in for a repeat performance. I do not forsee a long occupation of any sort. On that point the reserve calls are small and very targeted for specific posts, e.g., they called the reserve pilots but not infantry.

Pailo July 14, 2006 - 12:05am

...in that there is a fairly large scale infantry call-out, but that it happened a while back:

The army was also calling up reservists. Only weeks ago, an entire reserve division was drafted in order to train for an operation such as the one the IDF is planning in response to Wednesday morning's Hizbullah attacks on IDF forces along the northern border.

All the accounts that I've seen percolating mentioning recent ground forces call-outs specify that the size of the forces mobilized is one division, which means either there's been a recent call-out with another division, or the accounts don't quite have the time resolution that the JPost's does. I wouldn't surprise me at all that this op's been in the works for a while as a pre-emptive that's being bumped up - the build up on the northern border's been intensely worrying to the IDF. If that's the occurence, I suspect even more strongly that the scenario's going to be a fairly broad spoiling attack emphasizing air power, followed by a withdrawal (if they even go in on the ground with conventional forces at all - I suspect they will, but it's not mandatory).

I suspect they'll have to do some more call-outs due to the Gaza thing happening at the same time, but hopefully that won't mean a general mobilization. If that's what happens, all bets are off.

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 14, 2006 - 7:59am

Hezbollah just had to pull this stupid sort of shit. Assholes. Still, the Israeli response is way overboard. The Lebanese govt doesnt have the ability to tell Hezbollah to get lost, so bombing Lebanese infrastructure is more likely to drive people into the pro-Hezbollah camp. Terribly counter-productive, bordering on pointless.

Mad Dog

MadDog July 14, 2006 - 8:37pm

Other defence sources say Hezbollah also has longer range missiles. Asked about the claims, a source close to Hezbollah said: "Wait a few days and you'll find out."

Saturday 15 July 2006, 20:09 Makka Time, 17:09 GMT

Israel claims that the guided missile that hit one of their naval warships, killing at least one sailor, was Iranian-made.

The missile strike, late on Friday, caused substantial damage to the vessel and left four sailors missing.

Israel recovered the body of one of the four on Saturday. The ship was towed back to port in Haifa, still smouldering from the attack.

Brigadier-General Ido Nehushtan, an Israeli commander, said the body was found at sea and that the military were searching for the other three.

Nehushtan said Hezbollah had launched an Iranian-made missile at the vessel.

"This shows very profound thumbprints of Iranian involvement in Hezbollah," he said.

An Israeli military source separately said that a C802 radar-guided missile with a range of 100 kilometres had been fired at the ship as it sat off the coast, enforcing a blockade on Lebanon's ports after two Israeli soldiers were abducted on Wednesday.

"This is sophisticated weaponry," the Israeli military source said. "This is advanced weaponry that is being supplied by one terrorist state [Iran] to another."

It was thought that a second land-to-sea missile had hit and sank an Egyptian merchant ship but it has since emerged that it was a Cambodian merchant vessel that was hit.

The 12 Egyptian sailors on board survived the attack and were collected from the water by other passing ships.

Iran has denied involvement and their embassy in Beirut has released a statement saying: "These accusations by Israeli officials are baseless and constitute an attempt to escape reality and cover up the impotence of this regime in the face of resistance and the Lebanese people."

Dramatic effect

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's leader, dramatically announced the naval attack during a live telephone call to the group's television station. The rockets were fired as he spoke.

"The surprises that I had promised you start now. Now, at sea, an Israeli warship ... off Beirut is burning and will sink," he said.

Lebanese sources say Hezbollah has more sophisticated weapons systems, most notably short-range anti-aircraft batteries that have not been used so far.

Israel believes that Hezbollah, a group backed by Iran and Syria, has between 10,000 and 12,000 rockets in its arsenal with a variety of ranges, from around 30 to 70 kilometres.

Other defence sources say Hezbollah also has longer range missiles. Asked about the claims, a source close to Hezbollah said: "Wait a few days and you'll find out."

MORE

Tina July 15, 2006 - 5:13pm

Jul. 16, 2006 2:07
Israel wary of bringing down Lebanese government
By ORLY HALPERN

Jerusalem Post - Israel has yet to hit Lebanon as hard as it could because it fears that doing so would cause the fledgling government to fall, a high-ranking military official said Saturday, adding that if necessary, it would take such action.

"We didn't take the gloves off completely," the official told reporters in a briefing at the Defense Ministry's Tel Aviv headquarters. "Imagine if we hit Lebanon's four power stations. It would throw Lebanon back years. Gaza [where Israel hit the power station two weeks ago] can't go any further backwards. But Lebanon will lose billions of dollars and it will take years to reconstruct [the power stations]."

So far, Israel has held back because of the fragile situation of the Lebanese government, which could collapse if the whole country is brought to a standstill after losing its electricity. Lebanon only recently threw off the yoke of a Syrian occupation, voted in an independent - but highly factional - government, and began improving its economy, which was in ruins after a long civil war.

The officer said Israel needs to be "very careful that we only put enough pressure on the Lebanese government to change the situation but not enough to make it fall."

Israel holds the Lebanese government responsible for Hizbullah's actions and has been attacking civilian infrastructure, both to prevent its use by Hizbullah and to "send a message to the Lebanese that they will pay a high price" for Hizbullah's attacks on Israel.

The high-ranking military official rejected US President George W. Bush's statement that Syria could and should influence Hizbullah to stop its rocket attacks and release the two soldiers who were kidnapped last week.

"The Syrians are not the key to the solution," he said. "In 1996 they were, now they are not."

He called Syria a "negative factor" adding that "Iran is much worse."

Despite the missile strikes on the home and offices of Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the official said that assassinating Nasrallah was not the goal.

"We wanted to send him a message that he is not immune and we can get him anywhere," he said. He added that the army's goal was not to dismantle Hizbullah.

"It's not realistic to dismantle Hizbullah," he said, "or to chase them out of Lebanon until there are no Hizbullah gunmen there." The goal was rather to weaken Hizbullah and to distance it from the Israeli border where it had built up an infrastructure, he said.

The official said Israel was always willing to use indirect channels for solving the problem, like using foreign mediators "as we have done in the past."

In the end, the military cannot solve the security problem Israel faces, he said."There is no military solution. It's always diplomatic."

Tina July 15, 2006 - 10:26pm

I wonder if he's sending a message to the world, or to his own government.

Ian Welsh July 16, 2006 - 4:22am

Hizbollah rocket barrage kills at least 8 in Haifa
16 Jul 2006 08:12:39 GMT
Source: Reuters

(Adds quotes, details throughout)

By Ilan Rosenberg

HAIFA, Israel, July 16 (Reuters) - A barrage of Hizbollah rocket fire pounded the Israeli city of Haifa on Sunday, killing at least eight people and wounding 20 in the deadliest missile attack by the Lebanese guerrilla group in more than a decade.

Around 20 rockets landed in and around the port city, Israel's third largest, with one striking a train depot and causing most of the casualties, police and medics said. Television pictures showed blood on smashed rail compartments.

Hizbollah claimed responsibility for the salvo, saying it had fired "dozens" of longer-range "Raad 2 and Raad 3" rockets in retaliation for Israeli attacks on Lebanon's infrastructure and the killing of civilians.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the attacks would have "far-reaching consequences", saying Israel was not about to bend to Hizbollah pressure. In the past, Israel has said that attacking Haifa would be crossing a "red line".

Sunday's high death toll was expected to lead to an intensification of Israel's air and sea campaign against Lebanon, where it has bombed targets across the south and hit Hizbollah buildings in Beirut over the past four days.

Around 100 Lebanese, all but a handful of them civilians, have been killed in the bombardments, which Israel has said could continue for weeks or months, until Hizbollah's ability to fire rockets into Israel is destroyed.

The Shi'ite Muslim group, which has virtually carved out an independent state in southern Lebanon and is a member of Lebanon's coalition government, has fired more than 400 rockets into Israel in the past five days, killing a total of 12 people and wounding hundreds. Thousands have fled northern Israel.

Following Sunday's strike, residents of Haifa, a city of 250,000 people that lies about 35 km (20 miles) south of the Lebanese border, rushed to bomb shelters as warning sirens blared across the city.

Haifa is one of a range of northern Israeli cities that have been targeted by Hizbollah since the crisis began last Wednesday, when Hizbollah captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross border raid and killed eight others in ensuing clashes.

Hizbollah, led by Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and backed by Syria and Iran, is believed to have about 10,000 to 12,000 rockets in its arsenal, with a range of between 30 km and 70 km.
more

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L16428724.htm

Tina July 16, 2006 - 5:01am

Lebanon's Hizbollah threatens destruction of Israeli city Haifa
13:07 | 16/ 07/ 2006

TEL AVIV, July 16 (RIA Novosti) - Lebanese radical Islamist group Hizbollah warned Israel Sunday that the country's third largest city Haifa, along with its suburbs, would "burn in flames" if Israel committed any "new foolish acts".

Israel launched a military operation in Lebanon after the Hizbollah movement took two Israeli soldiers hostage on Wednesday. Over 100 Lebanese civilians were killed and more than 200 wounded. Israeli aircraft also bombed the Gaza Strip.

Israeli emergency services said earlier Sunday that at least eight people had been killed and 17 wounded in a shooting in Haifa, as Hizbollah continued its fire against the country.

Lebanese sources said that in the attack on Haifa, missiles hit a railway station, the city port, and an oil refinery, killing nine and wounding at least 20 people.

The militant group threatened to focus its next missile attacks on Haifa's oil refining complex.

Haifa, home to about 270,000 people, is a major Israeli sea port. Russia has a consulate general in the

http://en.rian.ru/world/20060716/51417840.html

Tina July 16, 2006 - 7:03am

Sunday, July 16, 2006
PM Olmert's remarks after Haifa attacked

PM Olmert's Remarks From the Start of the Weekly Cabinet Meeting Today
(Sunday), 16.7.06
(Communicated by the Prime Minister's Media Adviser)

Following are Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's remarks from the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting today (Sunday), 16.7.06:

"This is a very difficult morning for all of us. The severe blows on Haifa
follow the murderous attacks on population centers throughout the country.
These attacks are designed to hurt civilians because this is Hizbullah's
criminal war against Israel and its residents. On behalf of the Cabinet and
the people of Israel, I would like to send condolences to the families of
those IDF soldiers and civilians who were killed and best wishes for a full
recovery to those who were wounded, and to embrace the abductees and their
families.

Several days ago, the State of Israel was attacked from the north. This
attack follows the terrorist attack from the Gaza Strip. In both instances,
the attacks began without any reason and they are mostly directed against
innocent Israeli civilians within the sovereign territory of the State of
Israel. In both the north and the south, there is no claim by any regional
or international element whatsoever that Israel is in an area the
sovereignty of which is disputed. The State of Israel cannot countenance
this. We have no interest or desire to hurt the Lebanese or the Palestinian
peoples. We want to live our lives quietly and to be good neighbors.

To my regret, there were those who incorrectly interpreted our aspiration to
live in peace. We have no intention to give in to these threats. We know
that many tests yet await us. Our enemies are trying to disrupt life in
Israel - they will fail. The public is strong and united in this struggle.

In both north and south, the resolve being demonstrated by the public is an
important part of the strength of the State of Israel and we are very proud
of this. We must show patience and forbearance. This struggle is under no
time constraints; this is a daily struggle and we - the Israeli Government
and public - will continue to show equanimity, determination and sagacity as
necessary. Our struggle is both moral and just and no other people in the
free world would act as we have.

The Government is ready to extend immediate assistance to the residents of
the north - in all areas. Government representatives, at all levels, have
been instructed to formulate a socio-economic assistance plan. Throughout
the operation, an interministerial Directors-General committee, chaired by
Prime Minister's Office Director-General Ra'anan Dinur will - in full
coordination with the Finance Ministry - provide assistance as necessary to
the residents.

The decisions that we face are difficult and complex. My Government is
determined to continue doing whatever is necessary in order to achieve our
goals. Nothing will deter us, whatever far-reaching ramifications regarding
our relations on the northern border and in the region there may be.

In conclusion, I would like to tell Defense Minister Amir Peretz, IDF
Chief-of-Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz, Israel Police Commissioner Moshe Karadi
and all members of the IDF and the security services: I am proud to live in
a state with such an army and with such security services. Continue the
struggle without hesitation, the entire people of Israel are behind you."

http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=30095

Tina July 16, 2006 - 7:04am

Maybe we should put together a fund to buy Olmert a fucking mirror.

Ian Welsh July 16, 2006 - 6:25pm

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait pledge $70 mln to help Lebanon
16 Jul 2006 13:48:00 GMT
Source: Reuters

DUBAI, July 16 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia and Kuwait pledged $70 million on Sunday to help Lebanon after its prime minister said Israeli attacks turned the country into a disaster area.

Prime Minister Fouad Siniora said late on Saturday Beirut needed a comprehensive plan to rush aid into the country.

The official Saudi Press Agency said King Abdullah ordered the immediate transfer of $50 million "for the (Lebanese) prime minister to spend on emergency aid and basic services to alleviate the suffering of the Lebanese people".

It said the move was in response to Siniora's call.

The cabinet of fellow Gulf Arab oil exporter Kuwait allocated $20 million "to provide urgent aid to brothers in Lebanon to help them in the face of this barbaric aggression and ease their suffering".

More than 110 people have been killed in Israeli attacks on Lebanon since Hizbollah guerrillas captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight on Wednesday. The attacks destroyed key infrastructure, including bridges, power stations and ports.

In Israel at least 12 people have been killed in attacks by Hizbollah.

The United Nations maintains a peacekeeping force in south Lebanon where Hizbollah guerrillas are active.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L1634714.htm

Tina July 16, 2006 - 10:24am

Strikes to intensify in four-stage strategy
ANALYSIS

Abraham Rabinovich
July 17, 2006
THE fierce Israeli attack in Lebanon is following a carefully orchestrated plan, not yet half completed, that calls for four stages of mounting intensity, according to Israeli sources.

In the first stage, which began shortly after the Hezbollah incursion across the border last Wednesday, Israeli warplanes attacked missile caches in south Lebanon and elsewhere, particularly those housing long-range missiles.

Fifty caches, some hidden underground and in private homes, were reportedly destroyed. It is unclear what percentage of the 13,000 missiles known to be in Hezbollah hands that accounts for. Meanwhile, artillery pounded Hezbollah positions and command posts from the Israeli side of the border.

In this stage, the Israel Defence Forces also bombed Beirut airport and imposed a sea blockade to impress upon the Lebanese Government the consequences of having let Hezbollah freely attack Israel from southern Lebanon.

In the second stage, which began early on Friday, warplanes attacked the heart of Hezbollah power, shattering high-rise buildings in south Beirut housing the militia's command structure as well as the home of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was reportedly trapped for a while in the underground command centre when the building above it collapsed.

The third and fourth stages are still secret. However, the sources said the operation calls for each of the four stages to be more powerful than the previous one.

Another reported principle is that the targets are hit in a specified order that will not be deviated from in order to retaliate against Hezbollah attacks.

A constantly expanding "target bank" drawn up by the IDF, consisting of hundreds of sites, is approved at periodic meetings of a cabinet subcommittee chaired by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

One of the final stages, presumably, is the entry of ground forces into Lebanon. If Israel's main objectives -- a halt in the firing of missiles and a Lebanese agreement to displace Hezbollah from the border with Israel -- have not been achieved by the end of this week, ground troops will cross the border, the sources said.

Israel is unenthusiastic about getting bogged down in a guerilla war in southern Lebanon, as it was for 18 years before 2000.

But the head of operations on the IDF general staff, Brigadier General Gadi Eisencott, said at the weekend that any ground incursion would be limited in time and in the area affected. Israeli officials say the international community will not force Israel to stop before its goals are achieved.

link

Tina July 16, 2006 - 12:06pm

Israel blames Hizbollah after Canadian deaths
17 Jul 2006 00:22:34 GMT
Source: Reuters

JERUSALEM, July 17 (Reuters) - The Israeli army said after seven Canadians were killed in southern Lebanon that it had warned residents of the village to clear out of the area and that Hizbollah was responsible for any civilian deaths.

"The IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) requested and warned residents of the area not to stay within range of the launch sites" used by Hizbollah to fire rockets into Israel, the army said in a statement.

"The responsibility for any civilian casualties rests entirely with the Hizbollah terrorist organization," the army said.

Seven Canadians were killed and three more were wounded on Sunday when shells hit their house in southern Lebanon. Canadian media reported that all the dead Canadians were from the same Montreal family in Lebanon for the summer holidays.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L16111660.htm

Tina July 16, 2006 - 9:08pm

'We feel the world has left us to be slaughtered'
MICHAEAL THEODOULOU AND CHRISTIAN HENDERSON IN BEIRUT

LEBANON last night warned it faced "real annihilation" by Israel who had dramatically escalated the violence of its campaign after Hezbollah rockets hit the city of Haifa.

"We are facing a real annihilation carried out by Israel," Information Minister Ghazi Aridi said after an emergency cabinet meeting.

"Israel is using internationally prohibited weapons against civilians," he said.

He did not elaborate on the weapons allegedly used. But Lebanese media reports said Israel had used phosphorus incendiary bombs and vacuum bombs, which suck up the air and collapse buildings. The reports were not confirmed.

Large swaths of Beirut were covered in fine white dust from the barrage. Around the Hezbollah compound in the southern district - known as Dahiyah - entire blocks were littered with heaps of rubble and twisted metal, as fires raged.

"We feel the entire world has left us alone to be slaughtered," said Ali al-Amin, a 40-year-old civil engineer who has stayed in his nearby home with his sister and mother because they have nowhere else to go. Many families have already fled.

much more

Tina July 16, 2006 - 9:23pm

LEBANESE TELEVISION SAYS ISRAELI F-16 PLANE SHOT DOWN, SHOWS FAL
17 Jul 2006 11:20:47 GMT
Source: Reuters
Printable view | Email this article | RSS [-] Text [+]

LEBANESE TELEVISION SAYS ISRAELI F-16 PLANE SHOT DOWN, SHOWS FALLING DEBRIS

Also unconfirmed reports that israel troops have entered lebanon

Tina July 17, 2006 - 7:58am

Israel bombards Beirut's port and airport

At least 23 people have been killed by Israeli air strikes in Lebanon today as the violence there shows no signs of easing. Israel has dismissed talk of sending an international force to southern Lebanon to help end Hezbollah rocket attacks as premature and continued to bombard the country's infrastructure. Beirut's port and international airport came under attack. Petrol stations and factories elsewhere were also hit. Israel's military campaign, launched after Hezbollah captured two of its soldiers, has resulted in the loss of lives of some 176 Lebanese - all but 13 of them civilians.

http://euronews.net/create_html.php?page=detail_info&article=369852&lng=1

Tina July 17, 2006 - 8:50am

Haifa under rocket attack again; 3-story building hit

(VIDEO) At least seven blasts rock northern city; sirens heard once and again. Building directly hit by rocket, partially collapses; several injured, one sustains serious wounds. Carmiel, Safed, Akko and Tiberias area also hit by rockets
Ahiya Raved

VIDEO - On the day after the deadly attack on the Haifa Bay, rockets hit the city again Monday afternoon. Seven explosions were heard in the northern city following air raid sirens at 2 p.m. A number of rockets landed in central Haifa.

After another hour of sirens, a second barrage hit at 3 p.m. One rocket struck a three-story building in the city causing two floors to collapse.

more

Tina July 17, 2006 - 9:08am

July 17, 2006, 7:17AM
Israel denies aircraft lost near Beirut

© 2006 The Associated Press

BEIRUT, Lebanon — A Lebanese TV station showed video Monday of an object falling from the sky, but Israel said that reports that it was an Israeli aircraft were false. The video, aired by Lebanese Broadcasting Corp., showed a burning object spiraling down to the ground in the Jamhour district near the Hezbollah stronghold of southern Beirut, which have been under Israeli air attack for several days.

It described the object as an F-16 fighter jet, while Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV said the aircraft was a helicopter gunship.

But the Israeli army says reports of Israeli aircraft being shot down over Beirut are false, and Israel's Channel 10 TV reported that the object apparently was a container of leaflets that fell from an Israeli military plane.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4051424.html

Tina July 17, 2006 - 9:45am

Yaakov Katz | July 17

Jerusalem Post - A government spokesman said Monday afternoon that IDF ground forces had briefly entered southern Lebanon to target Hizbullah bases along the border in order to push the terrorist group out of rocket-firing range.

Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz declared that the IDF currently had much better alternatives than to launch a major ground incursion into Lebanon.

In addition, the IDF has denied Lebanese news reports that an Israeli F-16 jet was downed near Beirut. Virtually all Lebanese news agencies were showing unclear video footage of what was claimed to be the downed jet.

[more at link - also note, article is with files from AP]

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 17, 2006 - 10:01am

David Horovitz | July 13

The Jerusalem Post - Everything is a matter of balance, Maj.-Gen. (res.) Doron Almog said on Monday.

We were sitting in his back garden, and the major-general, who held overall responsibility for Gaza as OC Southern Command from 2000 to 2003, was pronouncing himself generally satisfied with the range of actions Israel was taking in its efforts to bring home Cpl. Gilad Shalit and to put a stop to the Kassam fire on Sderot and Ashkelon.

"It may be that we should have moved to more aggressive action to thwart the Kassams before the Kerem Shalom attack [in which Shalit was kidnapped and two soldiers were killed]," Almog said. "But the government decided on a more moderate course of action. And there's no point in talking about 'if only.'

"Now, the fact that a soldier is being held complicates the dilemma. If the government doesn't act firmly, there is the danger that stems from it being perceived as weak. But if it uses a lot of force, there is the danger that those who are holding Shalit will kill him."

Overall, though, Almog said he felt the crisis was being handled properly, with the prime minister finding the right balance between the numerous options - military, economic, diplomatic, etc. - at his disposal.

That was on Monday.

On Wednesday afternoon, as Israeli ground forces punched into Lebanon in search of the two kidnapped soldiers, and before word of the killings of eight others had been cleared for publication by the military censor, I spoke to Almog a second time, by telephone. "Yes, David," he said, unsurprised, when he heard my voice. "You want to complete the interview?"

"Or start it over," I suggested.

[more at link, above]

[Comment: An interesting piece detailing the thinking of a former commander of Southern Command - unfortunately only some of the questions focus on the North, most focus on Gaza (and boy do they seem locked in down there). ~ JPD]

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 17, 2006 - 12:58pm

Ronny Sofer | July 17

Yediot Aharonot - Minister of Science, Technology, and Culture Minister Ophir Pines-Paz said following Monday’s rocket barrages on Haifa and Galilee communities “a ground operation in Lebanon should not even be a possibility, even if Hizbullah steps up its attacks against Israel’s home front up.”

“I do not want to even think of the possibility that Hizbullah will attack Gush Dan (central Israel), but either way, no one is suggesting a ground operation at present time,” Paz-Pines said.

“The situation on the ground won’t be altered by force alone; diplomatic efforts must accompany the military operations. The Israeli government must act so the international community will pressure Lebanon into deploying its forces on the border.”

[Comment: The guy's not the IDF Chief of Staff or the Minister of Defence, so take it for what it's worth. I don't have a good enough handle on the players to know whether this is a trial balloon, personal opinion, posturing, or what have you. ~ JPD]

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 17, 2006 - 4:15pm

Hanan Greenberg | July 18

Yediot Aharonot
- Defense Minister Amir Peretz approved Monday night the draft of three reserves brigades – infantry and engineers. The forces will be drafted starting Tuesday morning and will replace regular forces in Judea and Samaria. The regular forces will help in the northern array.

As of today, infantry and engineer corps are operating to destroy Hizbullah outposts in the line of fire. Deputy Chief of the General Staff, Maj. Gen. Moshe Kaplinsky, revealed, in a Monday press conference at the IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv, that in recent days, forces were operating in a ground offensive against Hizbullah outposts in Rajar village.

[more at link, above]

[Comment: Contra the above, there's this. ~ JPD]

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 17, 2006 - 6:53pm

July 18

Ha'aretz - Defense Minister Amir Peretz on Monday approved a plan to call up a limited number of Israel Defense Forces reservists, in the wake of the IDF's escalating offensive on Lebanon.

Three reservist units will take positions in Gaza and the West Bank as the units regularly serving there move to the north.

IDF Deputy Chief of Staff Moshe Kaplinski on Monday said the IDF's offensive would continue at least another week. "We will continue to operate to shorten the breath of this organization," he said.

[more at link, above]

"We declared war on terror, it's not even a noun, so, good luck. After we defeat it, I'm sure we'll take on that bastard ennui." - Jon Stewart.

JustPlainDave July 17, 2006 - 6:54pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.