Kind of a Hollow Thud


Peter Daou correctly notes today in the Huffington Post about the flop that was yesterday's Democratic National Security Plan announcement. There is absolutely no question the media (and the Democratic Party) was owned on this. It's really rather sad, as I wrote yesterday because "The Democrats have never put anything out like this before." Finally Democratic politicians are taking this seriously.

Or so it would seem.

The Bush administration played the Democrats like a schoolyard bully. That should have been expected. The Democrats telescoped the fact that they were going to announce their new policy way in advance. What'd they expect? A free pass? From Karl Rove?

The more serious issue is that the Democrats seemed unserious about this. And the fact that no Congressional Democrat reached out to a blogger on this?

It appeared ( especially based on the lack of blogger and politician follow-up) that they thought, "hey, we'll do a press conference and then the public will take us seriously. And we'll ride it out 'til November!" No wonder we can't win on this issue.

Another part of the problem is bloggers themselves. We bloggers often criticize the mainstream corporate media's focus on the horse race to the detriment of all other political reporting. Well, we bloggers (including me) often focus on what the media avoids talking about rather than, you know, actually talking about it, creating momentum and buzz.

Seriosuly, name me five progressive bloggers talking about the plan?

The only bloggers who addressed this issue positively were us here at The Agonist and Georgia10 at the Daily Kos. Atrios and Think Progress (a post that quickly vanished--second thoughts, perhaps?) blasted the plan because it didn't call for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Look, I want the troops out now too, but sometimes we have to support the party on these issues--and that means giving them room to maneuver. If we help shape a media environment whereby progressive Democrats are taken seriosuly on issues of national defense and security it'll be a lot easier to call for withdrawal.

To do that will entail an important first step: quit whining about the treatment we get in the media and start talking about the critical issues. In the last few months I've watched progressive blogs shift the debate in a handful of issues. And then, only after the politicians have been engaged, has it finally made it into mainstream media circulation. It's hard work, but we desperately have to get national security policy right and as I said once before, "The best way to sound serious and well informed is to be both."


Sean Paul Kelley March 30, 2006 - 5:33pm

I don't know whether I'm thinking what a lot of us on the left are thinking, but Booman is just about perfectly right: all of this smacks of, if not imitation Bush, then reaction to Bush. Was there anything in the plan that was fresh, original, gutsy, and succinct?

And then there's the possibility that Americans are being told that security is their #1 issue, but maybe it's not. The Pew polls have sniffed around the issue over the past several years and always the answer is that there's no firm answer.

PW March 30, 2006 - 10:19pm

I'm a bit ashamed to say I didn't even know about this until I read this post.

I did take a look at the plan, and it seems to be the standard stuff Democrats have been saying for years. Good stuff. Not sure I saw much new, but this is stuff we need to be talking about.

P M Bryant March 31, 2006 - 12:16am

glad we made you aware of it. Now you can tell people you know how serious the Dems are when it comes to security.

Love Firefox, Hate IE

Sean Paul Kelley March 31, 2006 - 12:21am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.