<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Agonist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agonist.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agonist.org</link>
	<description>Thoughtful - Global - Timely</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia turns its attention to Syria – and the rest of the Middle East as well by Arnie</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/russia-turns-its-attention-to-syria-and-the-rest-of-the-middle-east-as-well/#comment-245714</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107074#comment-245714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We shall differ greatly upon what Brian Downing implies, this reader stands firmly behind the characterization provided, your reading and the background you bring into your assessments will not be the same, nor the conclusions, nor the implications. The tract above is completely framed in both form and terms recreating cold war propaganda. I can understand how these can be used to deceive, YMMV. The facts being obscured is a stable legitimate state has been put under attack by outside forces and it has responded with the legitimate right to defend its existence. Facts alleged against this state have not been provided or proven. Sarin gas is not dissimilar to pesticides readily available to anyone. Such is truly shabby grounds to be drawing red lines upon. But as long as this is being hidden, please enjoy your perpetual war on everything; some day, maybe, the favour will be returned - again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shall differ greatly upon what Brian Downing implies, this reader stands firmly behind the characterization provided, your reading and the background you bring into your assessments will not be the same, nor the conclusions, nor the implications. The tract above is completely framed in both form and terms recreating cold war propaganda. I can understand how these can be used to deceive, YMMV. The facts being obscured is a stable legitimate state has been put under attack by outside forces and it has responded with the legitimate right to defend its existence. Facts alleged against this state have not been provided or proven. Sarin gas is not dissimilar to pesticides readily available to anyone. Such is truly shabby grounds to be drawing red lines upon. But as long as this is being hidden, please enjoy your perpetual war on everything; some day, maybe, the favour will be returned &#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia turns its attention to Syria – and the rest of the Middle East as well by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/russia-turns-its-attention-to-syria-and-the-rest-of-the-middle-east-as-well/#comment-245713</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107074#comment-245713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there wasn&#039;t a plurality of Syrians supporting Assad before the war (and it seems there was), a majority supports that government now that they&#039;ve had a taste of &quot;democracy&quot; NATO-GCC style. The rebel enablers have blood on their hands, in spades.  They&#039;re violating the Nuremberg Principles (VI.a.i&amp;ii) and should be charged for doing so (which will never happen).

Your criticisms of Brian&#039;s article, however, are based on what he didn&#039;t write.  The article was about Putin&#039;s moves in the Middle East, which would seem deft if his competition were not so weak and ignorant.  There are no cold war antics implied, although the U.S. efforts in the Caucasus and the meddling NGO&#039;s now on their way out of Russia would indicate there was one.  Rather, Putin is supporting Syria (among other reasons) as a means of stopping more U.S. proxy wars in his back yard.  Brian&#039;s point about the specific advantages Russia in the ME is also valid and the analysis is strong.

On the larger issues, hopefully, this experience plus having to negotiate our way out of Afghanistan via the Taliban should teach a lesson to the powers that be - no matter what you do, ignore the neocons!  Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there wasn&#8217;t a plurality of Syrians supporting Assad before the war (and it seems there was), a majority supports that government now that they&#8217;ve had a taste of &#8220;democracy&#8221; NATO-GCC style. The rebel enablers have blood on their hands, in spades.  They&#8217;re violating the Nuremberg Principles (VI.a.i&#038;ii) and should be charged for doing so (which will never happen).</p>
<p>Your criticisms of Brian&#8217;s article, however, are based on what he didn&#8217;t write.  The article was about Putin&#8217;s moves in the Middle East, which would seem deft if his competition were not so weak and ignorant.  There are no cold war antics implied, although the U.S. efforts in the Caucasus and the meddling NGO&#8217;s now on their way out of Russia would indicate there was one.  Rather, Putin is supporting Syria (among other reasons) as a means of stopping more U.S. proxy wars in his back yard.  Brian&#8217;s point about the specific advantages Russia in the ME is also valid and the analysis is strong.</p>
<p>On the larger issues, hopefully, this experience plus having to negotiate our way out of Afghanistan via the Taliban should teach a lesson to the powers that be &#8211; no matter what you do, ignore the neocons!  Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama and Congress Ignore the Will of the People on Syria by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/obama-and-congress-ignore-the-will-of-the-people-on-syria/#comment-245712</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=106276#comment-245712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changing our representatives is a dauntingi option.  Getting nominated for major office here is much like getting on the ballot in Iran.  One must pass a litmus test - can you raise funds.  That&#039;s answered by the essential question - do you go along with the status quo, plus or minus a degree or two.  If you&#039;re not &quot;mutual&quot; then you can&#039;t raise funds and neither party will allow you on the ballot.  So voting the creeps out is structurally denied.  When someone slips through or shifts after in office, there&#039;s always good old election fraud or character assassination through the mainstream media.

Blaming the people of the United States for those (s)elected is like blaming the gamblers in Las Vegas for losing a rigged game.  It makes no sense.

Having said all that, there&#039;s no place in pragmatic considerations to blame the Constitution for the lack of representative government.  The Constitution is routinely ignored by Congress.

However, we do have elections now and then and the pols do make promises, well they imply that they make promises.  That&#039;s what I&#039;m talking about here.  Obama was to be the anti-Bush, the less war, more positively oriented president.  He&#039;s not.  My point is both straight forward - Obama needs to respond to overwhelming majorities - and ironic as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing our representatives is a dauntingi option.  Getting nominated for major office here is much like getting on the ballot in Iran.  One must pass a litmus test &#8211; can you raise funds.  That&#8217;s answered by the essential question &#8211; do you go along with the status quo, plus or minus a degree or two.  If you&#8217;re not &#8220;mutual&#8221; then you can&#8217;t raise funds and neither party will allow you on the ballot.  So voting the creeps out is structurally denied.  When someone slips through or shifts after in office, there&#8217;s always good old election fraud or character assassination through the mainstream media.</p>
<p>Blaming the people of the United States for those (s)elected is like blaming the gamblers in Las Vegas for losing a rigged game.  It makes no sense.</p>
<p>Having said all that, there&#8217;s no place in pragmatic considerations to blame the Constitution for the lack of representative government.  The Constitution is routinely ignored by Congress.</p>
<p>However, we do have elections now and then and the pols do make promises, well they imply that they make promises.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talking about here.  Obama was to be the anti-Bush, the less war, more positively oriented president.  He&#8217;s not.  My point is both straight forward &#8211; Obama needs to respond to overwhelming majorities &#8211; and ironic as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia turns its attention to Syria – and the rest of the Middle East as well by Arnie</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/russia-turns-its-attention-to-syria-and-the-rest-of-the-middle-east-as-well/#comment-245711</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107074#comment-245711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Syria has been and is a Soviet/Russian client state and that is not about to change. Instead of bringing up old cold-war conjectures and things that go bump in the dark misrepresentations peppered throughout the foregoing propaganda tract, having the slightest modicum of knowledge of Syrian history would have provided some light to your readers rather than the shadowy spooks used to frighten the ignorant children you&#039;ve used. By its actions, Russia is attempting to bring stability to this crisis to counter the Washington-Wall Street-Tel Aviv-Downing Street axis of evil&#039;s attempts to destabilize whilst attempting to keep more blood off its blood-soaked hands. Washington&#039;s attempts to color what is happening as a &quot;Civil War&quot; belie Washington&#039;s acts to create cover for a foreigner dominated coup d&#039;état against a legitimate state that has fallen afoul of Washington&#039;s deleterious designs. That Al Qaida is involved shows it is still a CIA asset, doing the bidding of the hegemon, now that its original memory has been liquidated. Your tract makes no significant point that the majority of Syrians support the government - still. Not explainable in a non-multi-cultural characterization (cartoonization) provided above, but understandable coming from information deprived sources. Sorry your attempt does not ring true; it is a leaden rationalization of old propaganda so that your lying eyes don&#039;t deceive you - again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syria has been and is a Soviet/Russian client state and that is not about to change. Instead of bringing up old cold-war conjectures and things that go bump in the dark misrepresentations peppered throughout the foregoing propaganda tract, having the slightest modicum of knowledge of Syrian history would have provided some light to your readers rather than the shadowy spooks used to frighten the ignorant children you&#8217;ve used. By its actions, Russia is attempting to bring stability to this crisis to counter the Washington-Wall Street-Tel Aviv-Downing Street axis of evil&#8217;s attempts to destabilize whilst attempting to keep more blood off its blood-soaked hands. Washington&#8217;s attempts to color what is happening as a &#8220;Civil War&#8221; belie Washington&#8217;s acts to create cover for a foreigner dominated coup d&#8217;état against a legitimate state that has fallen afoul of Washington&#8217;s deleterious designs. That Al Qaida is involved shows it is still a CIA asset, doing the bidding of the hegemon, now that its original memory has been liquidated. Your tract makes no significant point that the majority of Syrians support the government &#8211; still. Not explainable in a non-multi-cultural characterization (cartoonization) provided above, but understandable coming from information deprived sources. Sorry your attempt does not ring true; it is a leaden rationalization of old propaganda so that your lying eyes don&#8217;t deceive you &#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China Manufacturing Contraction Deepens Amid Cash Pinch by graham</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/china-manufacturing-contraction-deepens-amid-cash-pinch/#comment-245710</link>
		<dc:creator>graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107089#comment-245710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GDP Growth would appear to be heading below 7% for this year, earlier than expected. &lt;a href=http://blogs.barrons.com/emergingmarketsdaily/2013/06/18/the-peoples-bank-of-china-gets-serious-risks-credit-crunch/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Credit crunch forecast - yesterday&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GDP Growth would appear to be heading below 7% for this year, earlier than expected. <a href=http://blogs.barrons.com/emergingmarketsdaily/2013/06/18/the-peoples-bank-of-china-gets-serious-risks-credit-crunch/ rel="nofollow">Credit crunch forecast &#8211; yesterday</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Echoes of Nam by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/echoes-of-nam/#comment-245709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107056#comment-245709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if they&#039;ll have a photo op with the Taliban and our representatives.  The Taliban could provide entertainment through some of their barbaric customs like beheadings, etc.  

But wait a minute!  The Taliban were the enemy, not they&#039;re our helpers to leave.  Once we&#039;re gone, can we call them an enemy or will they be removed from the Terra Watch List?  This is getting deep!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they&#8217;ll have a photo op with the Taliban and our representatives.  The Taliban could provide entertainment through some of their barbaric customs like beheadings, etc.  </p>
<p>But wait a minute!  The Taliban were the enemy, not they&#8217;re our helpers to leave.  Once we&#8217;re gone, can we call them an enemy or will they be removed from the Terra Watch List?  This is getting deep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five  Obama programs to turn things around quickly by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/five-things-obama-can-do-to-turn-things-around-quickly/#comment-245708</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107044#comment-245708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don, I hope your aunt doesn&#039;t read The Agonist;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, I hope your aunt doesn&#8217;t read The Agonist;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five  Obama programs to turn things around quickly by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/five-things-obama-can-do-to-turn-things-around-quickly/#comment-245707</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107044#comment-245707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah hah!  A Jackson Democrat.  My compliments.  I was thinking of using the building, actually ;)

I don&#039;t think we need another Fed and I&#039;d be thrilled if Congress did this but they won&#039;t.  They can&#039;t walk and chew gum at the same time.

My thought, not well explained, is a bank that would start with infrastructure - issuing the bonds - and move to become something like the Bank of North Dakota.  It could fund community banks that would then stimulate Main Street. Cut out the Zombies and let them die a natural death.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah hah!  A Jackson Democrat.  My compliments.  I was thinking of using the building, actually <img src='http://agonist.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we need another Fed and I&#8217;d be thrilled if Congress did this but they won&#8217;t.  They can&#8217;t walk and chew gum at the same time.</p>
<p>My thought, not well explained, is a bank that would start with infrastructure &#8211; issuing the bonds &#8211; and move to become something like the Bank of North Dakota.  It could fund community banks that would then stimulate Main Street. Cut out the Zombies and let them die a natural death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Echoes of Nam by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/echoes-of-nam/#comment-245706</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107056#comment-245706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can use the refund to pay for our health insurance;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can use the refund to pay for our health insurance;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia turns its attention to Syria – and the rest of the Middle East as well by Celsius 233</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/russia-turns-its-attention-to-syria-and-the-rest-of-the-middle-east-as-well/#comment-245705</link>
		<dc:creator>Celsius 233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107074#comment-245705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noam Chomsky is prescient and saw this right after the fall of the Berlin wall. His speech right after the fall (1991), warned the world that the U.S. has lost an important check/foil. And here we are. I knew he was right even at that time (I knew what we did in Vietnam); but it doesn&#039;t lesson my rage today, having seen his (Chomsky&#039;s) vision come to fruition… 
Persia is as important today (more so), as it has been throughout its very long history. Its been roughly 300 years since they were an aggressor (if memory serves) in the M.E.
This isn&#039;t (obviously) just about Syria.
It&#039;s the height of irony that our long time adversary will also be our savior, in a twisted sort of way. It seems Russia is back and it is none too soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noam Chomsky is prescient and saw this right after the fall of the Berlin wall. His speech right after the fall (1991), warned the world that the U.S. has lost an important check/foil. And here we are. I knew he was right even at that time (I knew what we did in Vietnam); but it doesn&#8217;t lesson my rage today, having seen his (Chomsky&#8217;s) vision come to fruition…<br />
Persia is as important today (more so), as it has been throughout its very long history. Its been roughly 300 years since they were an aggressor (if memory serves) in the M.E.<br />
This isn&#8217;t (obviously) just about Syria.<br />
It&#8217;s the height of irony that our long time adversary will also be our savior, in a twisted sort of way. It seems Russia is back and it is none too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia turns its attention to Syria – and the rest of the Middle East as well by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/russia-turns-its-attention-to-syria-and-the-rest-of-the-middle-east-as-well/#comment-245704</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107074#comment-245704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Arab street&quot; will pay attention to those themes of Russian policy that you mentioned.  

This is about as thoughtful as it gets.  Outstanding analysis of the situation.  The Syrian conflict could become the fulcrum on which turns a new balance and a retreat form the dreadful and idiotic pro war policies of the neoconservativesm ,who no dominate the Obama administration.

After I read this, it occurred to me - Putin&#039;s recent election was questioned and he took a hit with a large section of the Russian public. What&#039;s his response?  Really intelligent moves in foreign policy to show that the Russian bear is no longer in hibernation.  Nationalism based on reasonable policies is a winner.  He&#039;s trying to regain public support since the day of the Czars is past.  Doing a good job as a strategy of governance - what a concept!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Arab street&#8221; will pay attention to those themes of Russian policy that you mentioned.  </p>
<p>This is about as thoughtful as it gets.  Outstanding analysis of the situation.  The Syrian conflict could become the fulcrum on which turns a new balance and a retreat form the dreadful and idiotic pro war policies of the neoconservativesm ,who no dominate the Obama administration.</p>
<p>After I read this, it occurred to me &#8211; Putin&#8217;s recent election was questioned and he took a hit with a large section of the Russian public. What&#8217;s his response?  Really intelligent moves in foreign policy to show that the Russian bear is no longer in hibernation.  Nationalism based on reasonable policies is a winner.  He&#8217;s trying to regain public support since the day of the Czars is past.  Doing a good job as a strategy of governance &#8211; what a concept!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The past is prologue &#8211; WMD by Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/the-past-is-prologue-wmd/#comment-245702</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107068#comment-245702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right.  See Brian Downing&#039;s article.  It&#039;s outstanding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  See Brian Downing&#8217;s article.  It&#8217;s outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption Contest! by readr satx</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/caption-contest-4/#comment-245701</link>
		<dc:creator>readr satx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107025#comment-245701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;We get our flags made in China. They come pretty cheap, but sometimes they smell like smog.&quot;
&quot;We&#039;re working on a deal with some Syrians to get ours made there, but the samples they sent had sort of a chemical smell to them.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We get our flags made in China. They come pretty cheap, but sometimes they smell like smog.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re working on a deal with some Syrians to get ours made there, but the samples they sent had sort of a chemical smell to them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The past is prologue &#8211; WMD by Celsius 233</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/the-past-is-prologue-wmd/#comment-245700</link>
		<dc:creator>Celsius 233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107068#comment-245700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noam Comsky is prescient and saw this right after the fall of the Berlin wall. His speach right after the fall, warned the world that the U.S. has lost an important check/foil.
And here we are. I knew he was right even at that time; but it doesn&#039;t lesson my rage today, having seen his vision come to fruition...
It seems Russia is back and it is none too soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noam Comsky is prescient and saw this right after the fall of the Berlin wall. His speach right after the fall, warned the world that the U.S. has lost an important check/foil.<br />
And here we are. I knew he was right even at that time; but it doesn&#8217;t lesson my rage today, having seen his vision come to fruition&#8230;<br />
It seems Russia is back and it is none too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Echoes of Nam by Tina</title>
		<link>http://agonist.org/echoes-of-nam/#comment-245699</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agonist.org/?p=107056#comment-245699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;US races to mollify Hamid Karzai over plans for peace talks with Taliban&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Afghan president suspends long-term security talks with Americans amid anger over Taliban press conference in Qatar&lt;/em&gt;

    Dan Roberts in Washington and Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul
    The Guardian, Wednesday 19 June 2013 17.32 EDT	
    

The US was scrambling to salvage a plan to open peace talks with the Taliban on Wednesday amid a diplomatic row between Washington and the Afghan president Hamid Karzai over how the process was announced.

Repeated phone calls by John Kerry, the US secretary of state, appeared not to have mollified Karzai, who accused the Obama administration of duplicity. Irritated by a press conference in Qatar at which the Taliban effectively portrayed itself as a government in exile, Karzai suspended talks on a long-term security deal to keep US troops in Afghanistan after Nato leaves in 2014.

News on Tuesday that American diplomats would sit down with Taliban leaders – the first direct talks since the US helped oust the group from power in 2001 – prompted speculation that real progress towards a negotiated end to the war in Afghanistan might be in sight.

But while the Taliban hinted at meeting US demands of a break with al-Qaida – saying Afghan soil should not be used to harm other countries – there was only the barest of nods to the Afghan government&#039;s request that they talk to the current administration and respect the constitution. They infuriated Karzai by displaying a white Taliban flag and repeatedly referring to the &quot;Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan&quot;, the name the group used when they ruled from Kabul.

The Taliban also claimed responsibility for a rocket attack on the Bagram air base that killed four Americans on the same day that the tentative deal about talks was announced.

On Wednesday the US suspended plans to attend the talks, which were due to begin in Doha, the capital of Qatar, this week. Ambassador James Dobbins, its special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, will now remaining in Washington until further notice.

A state department spokeswoman said the US had also asked the Qatari government to remove a sign from outside a new Taliban office in Doha that proclaimed it as representing the &quot;Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan&quot;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/19/us-karzai-peace-talks-taliban&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US races to mollify Hamid Karzai over plans for peace talks with Taliban</strong></p>
<p><em>Afghan president suspends long-term security talks with Americans amid anger over Taliban press conference in Qatar</em></p>
<p>    Dan Roberts in Washington and Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul<br />
    The Guardian, Wednesday 19 June 2013 17.32 EDT	</p>
<p>The US was scrambling to salvage a plan to open peace talks with the Taliban on Wednesday amid a diplomatic row between Washington and the Afghan president Hamid Karzai over how the process was announced.</p>
<p>Repeated phone calls by John Kerry, the US secretary of state, appeared not to have mollified Karzai, who accused the Obama administration of duplicity. Irritated by a press conference in Qatar at which the Taliban effectively portrayed itself as a government in exile, Karzai suspended talks on a long-term security deal to keep US troops in Afghanistan after Nato leaves in 2014.</p>
<p>News on Tuesday that American diplomats would sit down with Taliban leaders – the first direct talks since the US helped oust the group from power in 2001 – prompted speculation that real progress towards a negotiated end to the war in Afghanistan might be in sight.</p>
<p>But while the Taliban hinted at meeting US demands of a break with al-Qaida – saying Afghan soil should not be used to harm other countries – there was only the barest of nods to the Afghan government&#8217;s request that they talk to the current administration and respect the constitution. They infuriated Karzai by displaying a white Taliban flag and repeatedly referring to the &#8220;Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan&#8221;, the name the group used when they ruled from Kabul.</p>
<p>The Taliban also claimed responsibility for a rocket attack on the Bagram air base that killed four Americans on the same day that the tentative deal about talks was announced.</p>
<p>On Wednesday the US suspended plans to attend the talks, which were due to begin in Doha, the capital of Qatar, this week. Ambassador James Dobbins, its special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, will now remaining in Washington until further notice.</p>
<p>A state department spokeswoman said the US had also asked the Qatari government to remove a sign from outside a new Taliban office in Doha that proclaimed it as representing the &#8220;Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan&#8221;. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/19/us-karzai-peace-talks-taliban" rel="nofollow">more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.549 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-20 02:31:47 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->