5 Lessons From Lamont's Victory


Crossposted at my Blog, Corrente. Be gentle, Agnonistas, this is my first post here.

Being an early morning person, I missed a lot of the crowing coming from the rabid late night victory lambs. But as I review various sites that were amazingly active last night (and everyone should think about upgrading to the 25$ server now, we’re only going to get bigger in the blogosphere as a result of all this), I’m thinking on a couple of lessons we can take away from our Glorious Victory. Let’s review.

1. Trust your feelings, Luke.

The simple fact is, as CTKeith and Kos explain, is that a lot of the more savvy, and eventually those who followed things closely, saw this coming, even to the point of months ago. One of the hardest things in our society, even after years of a vocal, well referenced, proven-fucking-right blogosphere, is that it’s still hard for a lot of us to doubt the CW coming from the SCLM.

One of the reasons I’m always shouting “turn off the TV, drop you subscriptions to the NYT” has to do with the way even small doses of punditry can infect the rational, reasoned mind. I’m certainly not immune; despite a great deal of knowledge about Iraq, I remember still holding some reservations at the start of the invasion that they’d eventually find some WMD. And as has been noted, the number of Americans who think they did is around 50%...today.

In a just world, that would shock people into forcing Congressional hearings on the media and the return of the Fairness Act. But that’s not our world. So it’s up to us, one convert at a time, to convince people that yes! Regular little people really are just as smart as the trustifarian, Ivy Educated gatekeeper media.

Joe was vulnerable because he was a warmonger and cheerleader for a completely failing occupation and invasion, a liar, an ass-kisser of the most vile President this nation has ever seen, and a near-traitor and scold of his own party, who only thought of his own power and ego. Americans may not be well informed, and they may also be evenly split between the two major parties, but the half of them who are Democrats and the third of them who are brain-functional Republicans have spoken: 2/3 now want and end to the war, and all it has brought.

It’s not really that hard to understand why such numbers equal a loss for one of the war’s biggest cheerleaders. And in fact, many people did think it would bring Lieberman down. We said so, all over the place. If we’re all a little shocked this morning, we shouldn’t be. Eventually, reality catches up with even the biggest fantasy-world denizen.

2. There’s still a lot of work to do.

Lamont just squeaked it out. I was biting my nails for a while there, with horrible memories of close elections past, and last minute “turnarounds.” The machine still functions, and Joe called in a lot of favors, and once again showed that there are many people who will vote against their own interests, or more importantly, for a single interest over anything else. Joe had a cozy relationship with plenty of heavy-hitters and traditionally strong GOTV groups, and it showed in the last hours of the count.

Our job now is to convince those groups that it’s time to embrace the New Politics, and get with the open source project. It’s just no longer the case that identity politics can work. Republicans have killed bipartisanship, dead, dead, dead. Progressive and liberal groups who care about our traditional issues MUST come to understand that the old methods aren’t going to work. There has to be a marriage, shot gun if necessary, between the open source movement and the traditional base.

I’m fairly confident Lamont can beat an independent Joe in the fall, but our margin of victory last night doesn’t warm my cockles. We should all make it a point to do what the Republican base has been doing for years: learn to not be afraid to chastise, whip, cajole, embarrass, and otherwise hound our moderates back into the fold, and on board with the unity program. They’ve still got the membership lists, mailing apparatus, and phone banks we’re going to need in the fall, and in 2008. It’s time they realized that we are the future, and that our combined efforts mean Democratic victory, bigtime.

But it’s up to us, here in the blogosphere, to make that realization clear and present in the minds of the traditional organizations who came out for Joe last night. That means less snark blogging, and more dissection of the mechanisms by which Democrats are actually elected.

3. This is not a victory for the far-left or very progressive element.

As our SCLM will never let us forget: Lamont is a millionaire businessman from a wealthy clan who is deeply moderate on most issues. His company isn’t unionized, he’s a friend of Israel’s invading/bombing government, he doesn’t exactly have a long track record of screaming for gay rights or tree-hugging environmentalism.

He’s a nice guy, I hear, and probably right for the residents of the Land of Bland, but he’s not going to be a firebrand if he gets to the Senate, and I already expect him to let radicals like me down on lots of issues. But radicals are a tiny minority in this country and the smart among us know it. CT voters approved a moderate who appeared less likely to lie, and to ass-kiss the other side, over a moderate with a very good liberal voting record and a penchant for whining.

That is not progressive victory, it is a victory for common sense. Democracy won last night, but in a Democracy, the will of a majority is what counts. That majority is moderate, and we can’t ever forget that as we craft messages for the fall and for 2008.

4. Get Ready for the SuperSmears.

Clearly, the whole “you crashed my server and I’m going to tell Daddy!” bullshit coming out of the Lieberman camp last night was a pitiful line of utter crap from start to finish. I’m not even going to document all the ways in which it was a lie, but the fact that is was isn’t the important point.

We’ve drawn blood, serious, royal blood, and we’ve made a bunch of Important Voices in the media look really, really bad. That means the game is going to go pro, and we had better be ready for every single dirty trick and death-by-gotcha maneuver we can imagine. They’re going to fine tooth comb the blogosphere now, dredge up ever extreme moment they can find, and continue to misrepresent bloggers, as well as outright make shit up.

I’m not saying that we need to change our ways and become as church elders in our speech and behavior, I’d never give up the Wild West feel of the blogosphere, I love it too much. But we should prepare for attack, get serious about making posts tight and well referenced, and most importantly, not be afraid to counterattack.

I hate our current political culture, I don’t like having to shout people down in an argument, but unfortunately, that’s what far too many people have become accustomed to in their daily diet of political discourse. There are lots of other factors at work as well, not the least of which has to do with the last six years being filled to the hilt with messages of “tough daddy America is always right” and “fear the mighty Islamofascist, run, run!”

Cutting through the brain-haze that such a narrative has created in many minds is going to be hard, hard work. Sometimes, that will mean that we’ll have to do some shouting, use some invective and ultrasnark, and at all times not be afraid to hit back. Hard. Hey, Crowley- can I get you another deep-fried Snickers bar? It’ll help with your depression.

5. Be Happy, Excellent, and Sexy to Each Other.

I’ve written on it before: we can never let anyone forget, inside and out, we’re the party of fun. Of sex, of sexy people, who are happy and who bring hope and joy to the world. No, I’m not trying to announce the Age of Aquarius here, but I do want you to remember what last night was like.

Whiny, shrimp eating loosers who couldn’t stop the nattering, bubbling kindergarten bitching vs. positive, forward looking, hope-filled winners. People like winners. They like parties, and kissing, and they like to feel good. Lieberman lost in large part because he couldn’t stop acting like a whiny, self concerned loser who was also pouty and unable to think of anyone but himself and his ego.

A lot of the pundit class is like that as well, which is why they constantly are complaining about us down here in the fever swamp. But at the root of that: jealousy. They know that we’re the future, a better future, and they hate and fear anyone who can imagine one better than they can. We’ve proven we can do that, in a hundred thousand posts and now in a clear, major victory at the polls. Let’s run with that.

It’s time for a new “morning in America,” and we can and will construct that. One without war, without economic suffering, without constant soul-crushing fear. That’s what people are crying out for, why they were so willing to stick so close to Lamont and his supporters, what they crave in their bellies and souls. It’s time we all embrace the project of giving that back to America, as well as the fact that we really have the spirit, heart, imagination and ability to make a brighter future for all.

If you only take away one lesson from last night, let it be that.


chicago dyke August 9, 2006 - 8:46am

First off, welcome from the BOP board. The one line that the Rethugs throwout is the "Dems have no new ideas" and the Rethugs are the party of action (macho nacho). It just feels good to win against the Rethugs for a start, Holy Joe was their proxy battle guy, now the Rethugs and the Dem machines are going to have to redraw the battle plans. I hold out little hope for the Dem machine to get it's act together, even with a national trend building for something different. It is serious bussiness, however if we can't laugh and enjoy life, game over.

"Takes a bucket of blood for a barrel of oil"

Steven Bruton

Peter C August 9, 2006 - 11:14am

An ever so gentle welcome, kudos on your great post and an your wicked good Corrente Wire, and awe for your clear and decisive train of thought and writing style.
What an honour to be able to read you here.
Thank you.

Wernerempire August 9, 2006 - 12:08pm

We’ve drawn blood, serious, royal blood, and we’ve made a bunch of Important Voices in the media look really, really bad. That means the game is going to go pro, and we had better be ready for every single dirty trick and death-by-gotcha maneuver we can imagine. They’re going to fine tooth comb the blogosphere now, dredge up ever extreme moment they can find, and continue to misrepresent bloggers, as well as outright make shit up.

This has been one of my gripes since the Kos convention. While reading around the blogs dem commenters are sensing blood and speaking out. However they are using the same tactics and rhetoric that they have bitched about the right using for the past 8 years. I understand the feel for revenge but fighting back with the same garbage will get the dems and bloggers no where quick.

It’s time for a new “morning in America,” and we can and will construct that. One without war, without economic suffering, without constant soul-crushing fear. That’s what people are crying out for, why they were so willing to stick so close to Lamont and his supporters, what they crave in their bellies and souls. It’s time we all embrace the project of giving that back to America, as well as the fact that we really have the spirit, heart, imagination and ability to make a brighter future for all.

Wonderful message!

Thanks for a great diary and I hope to see more. :)



In these times you have to be an optimist to open your eyes when you awake in the morning. ~ Carl Sandburg

Tina August 9, 2006 - 12:31pm

and Kudos to you SPK for linking to CD and for her deciding to join us.
I hope you return again and again, CD.

I have one question about:
[That is not progressive victory, it is a victory for common sense. Democracy won last night, but in a Democracy, the will of a majority is what counts. That majority is moderate, and we can’t ever forget that as we craft messages for the fall and for 2008.]

can we really say that the majority is "moderate"...and that progressivism is NOT "common sense"? serious. if you could flesh out your thoughts on those terms it would be much appreciated.

********************************************************
If this were 1700, they'd be saying: "Since civilization began, slavery has existed. It's human nature." I would have believed it. If 1800: "Women will never vote. They are not born rational". I would have believed it.
2006: Make war irrelevant

bernadene August 9, 2006 - 12:34pm

Welcome to the Agonist.

"That majority is moderate, and we can’t ever forget that as we craft messages for the fall and for 2008."

I'm going to quibble - the majority are not moderate. As one example, they are for universal health care.

It's possible to read the mainstream press and do fine, the key is to simply reject their frames and storylines and take only the actual data.

Ian Welsh August 9, 2006 - 12:34pm

If this were 1700, they'd be saying: "Since civilization began, slavery has existed. It's human nature." I would have believed it. If 1800: "Women will never vote. They are not born rational". I would have believed it.
2006: Make war irrelevant

bernadene August 9, 2006 - 12:50pm

It's possible to read the mainstream press and do fine, the key is to simply reject their frames and storylines and take only the actual data.

That is a really good way to put it! Thanks Ian!

Aaron Dellutri August 9, 2006 - 4:03pm

we're unable to perform that same feat on the internet :D

Escher Sketch August 9, 2006 - 9:02pm

Nice piece, chicago dyke.
Yes, yes, and all right on target.
What we know is that America really hasn't changed. Certain elements have taken center stage, and they represent people that have always been there and who rightly remained on the fringes, hoping against hope that folks like the Neocons could grab center stage and "change the world." They have tried, and it is very clear why they, too, have their place on the fringe and not at center stage.
It's hard work maintaining the intelligent leadership necessary to protect the Constitution, and it has been especially difficult since 2000. But things are looking up, as shown by the defeat of boring, boring Joe Lieberman who "stirring" speeches resemble an elementary school principal announcing a field trip to the local dairy.
Americans are waiting for something to awaken their normal selves from the kind of suspended animation, somnambulistic state in which they have not quite found themselves. So what will it take to push the majority -- Democrats and Independents and moderate Republicans -- to the Gladwell's "tipping point" so that the emotional logjam will explode in a burst of the fresh air of intellectual liberation?
We don't know, but it appears that we may be getting closer.

Channing
Ventura CA USA

Powder Monkey August 9, 2006 - 12:45pm

What a good way to start my day, thank you. I tend to agree with Ian, somewhat. Yes, IMHO, the majority do want UHC but that is because it is an issue that directly affects them and does not burst any preconceived bubbles of perception concerning what they believe is "right" whereas issues like marriage equality and a real living wage and so many others do infringe upon or even cross that "line" of conservative rightness.

I especially liked this:

"Whiny, shrimp eating loosers who couldn’t stop the nattering, bubbling kindergarten bitching vs. positive, forward looking, hope-filled winners. People like winners. They like parties, and kissing, and they like to feel good. Lieberman lost in large part because he couldn’t stop acting like a whiny, self concerned loser who was also pouty and unable to think of anyone but himself and his ego."

It's good to be an Agonista, welcome aboard CD...S


"I beseech you in the bowels of christ think it possible you may be mistaken."

Scott M August 9, 2006 - 1:34pm

Enjoyed your first diary. I'm not an American, but I didn't like Benedict Arnold Lieberman either. Glad to have you on board and look forward to reading more or your contributions at Agonist.

canuck August 9, 2006 - 3:01pm

of course, i was defining moderate by my standards, which come from my academic training and are from the perspective of what i belief and wish for politically. so yes, the majority of the electorate in this country is waaaay to the right of me, the largest block being in a center defined by the distance an individualist anarchist like me has from a reactionary white separatist theocrat on the other end of the spectrum.

but certainly i agree with those pointing out that such moderate views (for surely they are not exactly unheard of or extreme) like the belief in an end to war and universal health care, views held by a majority, appear "progressive" to the pundits and a majority of politicians in either party today. DC has swung, as a whole, quite far to the right, and dragged major sections of the SCLM along with it, the better to cover just how little what goes on there has to do with the actual will of the people. there is certainly and active and sizable right wing in this country, but as i have maintained elsewhere, it's smaller than many think, certainly far smaller than the representation it enjoys in the media and the halls of power.

but in a way, that's good news for our side. three thoughts: 1)it's actually a very small number of people who brought about and maintain the reactionary revolution 2)the majority in the middle doesn't really like to work or think to hard in politics, and will generally go with the flow of whatever is fresh and offers only the most basic of winning ideas, correctly framed 3)people are tired of the reactionary message, very tired of it in fact, and a comparitive history of the reactionary movement shows that we are in a very similar position today as they were decades ago, when they began the takeover of the old republican party.

short version: we can do this, kids.

chicago dyke August 9, 2006 - 4:00pm

i just noticed you moved this to the front page. /blushes/

chicago dyke August 9, 2006 - 4:09pm

The perspective just got a little wider around here. Thanks.

"Lord! What fools these Mortals be!"

Doug Richardson August 9, 2006 - 8:39pm

on this issue is much appreciated and I look forward to many more posts of this type.

Mark August 9, 2006 - 9:05pm

...we can never let anyone forget, inside and out, we’re the party of fun. Of sex...

Sad to say and more's the pity, but many Republicans have sex.

...of sexy people...

Horribile dictu, but I keep having to resist the temptation, whenever Ricean images appear in the media, of thinking about whether she's good-looking or not.

I know, I know, it shouldn't even occur to me so much as to consider the question. I should be entirely focused on her mendacity, dreadful job performance, and her legs, er, I mean her long list of crimes.

But it appears I can't help it.

Am I the only one with this problem?

stunster August 9, 2006 - 11:09pm

i'm being serious. i really think part of the problem is that republicans, while they know how to reproduce, have so many hangups that for them sex will always be more about shame and pain than about love and the big O. i look at someone like santorum or reed and i just can't believe that they laugh and smile as they make love. i think far too many fundies also are all screwed up about sex and it drives part of their hate.

i'm often told that fundie women are teh hot in bed, once they get out of daddy's house. all kinds of pent up energies and the desire to be really kinky. but then they have to maintain the image of being virginal, pure, etc...how does such a dichotomy not screw you up inside? same thing with closet case republican men- how sick is it to think abou what ken mehlman does for a living, and then does when he gets home? people who are paid to bash themselves are twisted, and i'd like that to end. hence, we're the party of good sex, where everyone can love as they will and no be judged. i would think that would appeal to people.

chicago dyke August 11, 2006 - 11:22am

evidenced by their obsession with sex, and their refusal to address more important issues that should be much more paramount in their religous schema. Jesus didn't really say much of anything about sex, specifically, but he did say alot about justice, etc. So much easier to focus on sex, in a weird, sad way, than to focus on those things they should.


"I beseech you in the bowels of christ think it possible you may be mistaken."

Scott M August 11, 2006 - 8:42pm

Enjoy.

lol

carib

Caribdude August 10, 2006 - 2:13am

one of those bobble-head dolls you see in rear windows of cars you pass on the highway.

"Lord! What fools these Mortals be!"

Doug Richardson August 10, 2006 - 8:35am




In these times you have to be an optimist to open your eyes when you awake in the morning. ~ Carl Sandburg

Tina August 10, 2006 - 8:43am

Skinny little pencil-neck & all. Now if they could make the mouth into a pencil sharpener...

"Lord! What fools these Mortals be!"

Doug Richardson August 10, 2006 - 2:39pm

and thought all that was needed were handcuffs, chains, and a whip! Her picture evoked sadism & masochism. I could just imagine Condi with a little country in chains under her boot whipping it to death with a sinister grin on her face. She mistakenly believed the country was enjoying the punishment.

Neocons would relish being spanked 'hard' by Condi wearing that outfit.

canuck August 10, 2006 - 9:31pm

i can tell this is the place to come for 'serious' comments on my posts.

...but i must say, i'd look really good in those boot. my legs are longer, and better.

chicago dyke August 11, 2006 - 11:18am

all work and no play makes chicago dyke a dull gal
all work and no play makes chicago dyke a dull gal
all work and no play makes chicago dyke a dull gal

one never knows where a discussion will go here :)



In these times you have to be an optimist to open your eyes when you awake in the morning. ~ Carl Sandburg

Tina August 11, 2006 - 11:24am

My mother bought me a pair of black leather pants for Christmas last year. I added a long-sleeved black turtleneck sweater and put on my knee-length black leather winter boots. Just joking around had posed as if driving a motorcycle and my granddaughter took a picture of me and took it to school.

"Woot, woot!" was the reaction from her classmates. "That's a cool granny you have, what's her phone number?"

canuck August 11, 2006 - 2:41pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.