SearchUser loginNavigationCreate new accountTeam AgonistEditor in Chief: Steve Hynd ThoughtfulGlobalTimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Corner: Brian Downing's Picks: Numerian's Numbers: Who's onlineThere are currently 5 users and 1354 guests online.
Online users:Syndicate |
Protecting Officials, Not SecretsCrossposted from The Newshoggers. David Keogh and Leo O'Connor have been found guilty of breaching the Official Secrets Act and will be sentenced tomorrow. The two had leaked a British government memo in the hope that the document would find its way into the public domain and expose the US president as a "madman". Although the British press are saying absolutely nothing now about the content of the memo, since they are all under threat of prosecution should they do so, the prosecution claimed during the trial that "the unauthorised disclosure of information in this case is likely to prejudice the capability of the armed forces either to carry out their tasks or lead to the loss of life or the possibility of loss of life or injury." When the memo was originally leaked, the UK's Daily Mail ran an article alleging that it contained a record of Tony Blair convincing George Bush not to bomb the Al Jazeera headquarters in allied Qatar. At the time, Newsweek's Michael Isikoff reported: British courts are not in the habit of jailing people under the Act for leaking jokes or leaks that are "absurd". The Bush administration should have some explaining to do, now. But I don't really expect the US press to ask the questions in the first place. As the famous UK political comedy "Yes, Minister" had it - "the Offical Secrets Act is there to protect officials, not secrets." Steve Hynd May 9, 2007 - 3:03pm
|
![]() Premium AdvertisingAgonist Page on FaceBookAgonist Facebook Activity |