Category - USA: Campaign 2008

Why Dems Lose Midterms

The preliminary numbers are in, and voter turnout was at a record low nationwide.

Conventional wisdom says that each party, Republican and Democrat, can count on roughly 45% of the vote, no matter what. The last ten percent is what you need to win an election.

Read More

Grimm Prospects

 

By now, you’ve read about or seen the assault on NY1 reporter Michael Scotto by Staten Island Congressman Michael Grimm. As it turns out, it was all anybody talked about in the aftermath of the State of the Union address Tuesday night, and as such, forced the GOP to go off message to defend one of their own.

They can’t be happy about that in an election year.

Read More

Blustering to Sell Books

Here’s what’s really weird about Robert Gates’ new book:

In Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary of War, Mr Gates recounts how Mr Obama appeared to lack faith in a war strategy he had approved and the commander he named to lead it, General David Petraeus, and did not like Afghan President Hamid Karzai, according to The New York Times and The Washington Post.

“As I sat there, I thought: the President doesn’t trust his commander, can’t stand Karzai, doesn’t believe in his own strategy and doesn’t consider the war to be his,” Mr Gates writes of a March 2011 meeting in the White House.

“For him, it’s all about getting out.”

Read More

Pass The Popcorn

Oh boy, this is going to be great!

“There is now an out in the open civil war within the Republican Party,” conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace wrote in a Politico op-ed this week.

He’s right.

Karl Rove has launched a new group, the Conservative Victory Project, which will aim to select GOP Senate candidates, weeding out future Todd Akins and squashing the prospects of anyone deemed unelectable.

It’s not sitting well with conservatives. Its first purported opponent is Steve King, a very conservative congressman with a history of colorful comments, who may be considering a run for Senate in Iowa.

After pantheon of Tea Party campaign groups (The Club for Growth, FreedomWorks and Tea Party Express) bashed the new effort, on Wednesday a cluster of conservative leaders demanded the new organization fire its spokesman, Jonathan Collegio, for calling Brent Bozell, a pundit who runs the conservative Media Research Center, a “hater” in a recent radio interview. Collegio had alleged that Bozell, a critic, has an ax to grind against Rove.

Read More

Yeah, It’s Sad When People Reap What They Sow

And here we have Dana Milbank doing what Dana Milbankk does best — being a clueless dork:

It was a lonely farewell for Joe Lieberman.

When the senior senator from Connecticut stood to give his parting address Wednesday afternoon, just one of his colleagues, Delaware Democrat Tom Carper, was with him on the Senate floor.

As Lieberman plodded through his speech, thanking everybody from his wife to the Capitol maintenance crews, a few longtime friends trickled in.

In came John Kerry (Mass.), who bested him in the 2004 Democratic presidential primaries and then, like many Senate Democrats, endorsed Ned Lamont, who tried to oust Lieberman from his Senate seat in 2006.

In came Susan Collins (Maine), Lieberman’s Republican counterpart on the Homeland Security Committee, whom Lieberman supported over a Democrat in her 2008 reelection.

In came GOP iconoclast John McCain (Ariz.), who was close to naming Lieberman as his vice presidential running mate in 2008 — which would have made Lieberman the first man on both a Democratic and a Republican national ticket.

A few more senators arrived during the 20-minute speech, but even by the end Lieberman was very much alone — which is how it has been for much of his 24-year tenure. He tried to push back against the mindless partisanship that developed in the chamber, and he paid dearly for it.

Lieberman was excommunicated by his party (he won as an independent in 2006 after losing the Democratic primary) and retired this year rather than face probable defeat. Yet he received little love from the Republicans, either, because despite his apostasies on key issues — the Iraq war, above all — he remained a fairly reliable vote for the Democrats.

Let’s be generous and say that Milbank is being naive here — although I think either disingenuous or just plain stupid would be more accurate. Joe Lieberman didn’t ally himself with the Republican Party out of a desire to be “bipartisan.” Joe Lieberman has always been the most cynical of opportunists — interested in Joe Lieberman and nothing else. That’s why he became an Independent after losing that 2006 Senate race in the Connecticut Democratic primary to Ned Lamont. He wasn’t willing to give up his powerful Senate career merely because he was deeply unpopular in his home state, largely because his first and deepest loyalty was to Connecticut’s insurance industry, which bought that loyalty with millions of dollars in campaign contributions — and he knew that his Republican support in the state would be enough to put him over the top. After he was returned to the Senate, Lieberman announced that he would caucus with the Democrats — even though, contrary to what Milbank suggests, his ideology is much more Republican than Democratic — because if he switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party he would have lost his seniority on the House Armed Services Committee, and his position as Chair of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

And then, in 2008, while still holding on to his prerogatives as a member of the Democratic leadership, Lieberman announced his support for John McCain in the presidential election. That was betrayal enough, but then Lieberman went one giant step further. He announced he planned to campaign for Lieberman. Then when McCain lost, he fought (successfully, more’s the pity) to retain his committee assignments when some Democrats called for him to be stripped of them.

The man is craven. He is an utterly amoral power-seeker, and he’ll do anything he has to to get it and keep it. The Senate is well rid of him.

Documents Found In Meth House Bare Inner Workings Of Dark Money Group

ProPublica/Frontline, By Kim Barker, ProPublica, and Rick Young & Emma Schwartz, Frontline, October 29

This post was co-published with PBS’ Frontline.

The boxes landed in the office of Montana investigators in March 2011.

Found in a meth house in Colorado, they were somewhat of a mystery, holding files on 23 conservative candidates in state races in Montana. They were filled with candidate surveys and mailers that said they were paid for by campaigns, and fliers and bank records from outside spending groups. One folder was labeled “Montana $ Bomb.” Read More

3bb1012ca7881a903f6bb688401857a5453d3be4