Space Travel And Truth In Bumper Stickers



The Sun


Former Sen. John Edwards, left, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama during the Democratic presidential primary debate in Manchester, N.H., June 3, 2007.



I sort of watched last night's debate, when the bloviation reached the painfully embarrassing level I would switch channels in favor of a program about the physics of the Sun, about which it may not be possible to bloviate.

Switching back and forth between those two particular shows created a kind of auditory strobe effect, in one moment the undeniable reality of the physical processes taking place on the Sun, in the next the equally undeniable bullshit taking place in a suburb of our solar system known as New Hampshire.

One self serving statement followed another, charges of timidity and lack of leadership leveled by Edwards against Clinton and Obama, charges of being 41/2 years late with leadership leveled against Edwards by Obama.

I had just returned from the Sun when those barbs were hurled and it struck me that it was possible that no one on the stage possessed the ability to lead a rifle squad down the street to buy a newspaper.

They all had their moments I suppose but during one orbit I heard Clinton say:

"The differences among us are minor, the differences between us and the Republicans are major. And I don't want anybody in America to be confused."

From "Democrats Focus on Iraq In Contentious Second Debate" by  Anne Kornblut and Dan Balz at The Washington Post

That was a bit of truth because, although I might have to hold my nose to vote for her and others on the stage last night, I am not capable of the kind of confusion that would lead me to vote Republican.

In her truthiness however, Ms Clinton neglected to mention the incredible similarities between the Democrats and the Republicans in their insatiable eagerness to sell out to the highest corporate bidder.

Iraq and health care seemed to take up most of the debate and I don't remember hearing a word about campaign and ethics reform, no mention of the lizards of K Street and their influence in preventing the delivery of Health care and prescription drugs as well as their influence in going to war and prolonging it.

To be fair though, it may have come up while I was eight light minutes away.

Another bit of truth that I caught as I whizzed by on one orbit was Edwards declaring Bush's global war on terror to be nothing but a bumper sticker slogan:

"That's all it is, all it's ever been -- was intended to do was for George Bush to use it to justify everything he does: the ongoing war in Iraq, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, spying on Americans, torture," Edwards said. "None of those things are okay. They are not the United States of America."

From "Democrats Focus on Iraq In Contentious Second Debate" by Anne Kornblut and Dan Balz at The Washington Post

Now that is something that I have been saying for years, so it must be true.

Reports that I read this morning have Obama as "commanding and confidant" whatever that means and five of the candidates are left almost unmentioned, mere also-rans playing the role of a "Greek chorus:

"Reduced to the status of a Greek chorus, the five Democratic also-rans had a difficult time breaking through the clutter. Joe Biden did have a strong moment when he challenged the growing panic over the threat of Iran producing nuclear weapons. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said bluntly, "Understand how weak Iran is. They are not a year away or two years away. They are a decade away from being able to ... put a nuclear weapon on top of a missile that can strike. They are far away from that." But Biden also blustered in the same answer when he said defiantly, "At the end of the day, if they posed a missile, stuck it on a pad, I'd take it out."

From "In New Hampshire, the Democrats play a little rougher" by Walter Shapiro at Salon

I don't know who won, and I suppose I could surf from one blog to another, or one candidate's web site to another all day and read arguments why each supposedly prevailed, but I think I'll resist the urge.

At the end I gave a split decision to Edwards because he said that he was wrong to have voted to authorize the war. Maybe if he and the rest who voted for this insanity start writing notes of condolence to all who have suffered the pain and death of this war they can finish before the Sun cools and dies.

Did you know that photons emitted in fusion reactions at the center of the Sun can take hundreds of thousands of years to reach the surface and then travel to earth in just a few minutes?

I learned that during last night's debate as well as learning the fact that the only thing in our solar system that may outlast the Sun will be this interminable campaign.

Bob Higgins

Worldwide Sawdust


BobHiggins June 4, 2007 - 10:30am
( categories: Miscellany )

And funny! This is the kind of op-ed that should be in a major publication!

Nominay June 4, 2007 - 10:55am

I think I like the sound of that.

Bob

BobHiggins June 4, 2007 - 1:58pm

From FDL's live blogging:

Q re corruption in government and earmarks. Should they be vetoed? Dodd doesnt want to put budgeting into straight jacket. Refocuses on better fiscal policies. Gravel says, get rid of earmarks totally, and use line-tiem veto. No one explains earmark problem is transparency.
Hillary explains presidenting: we have to raise revenues and curtial spending, and that’s how we got balance budges in the past. We did it before; we can do it again. Gravel reminds her about “raiding” the SS fund.
Biden says the problem is private funding of elections; move to public funding.

It wasn't easy to watch. This time I adopted the 'pick up the guitar and see how many standards I can play from memory' approach. Last time I tried to take notes but found myself playing the Calvinball of drinking games. My impression is that everyone had hits, but no homeruns. Everyone flubbed something, but no major errors. Clinton managed to come across as a real person; Obama managed to come across as having some convictions. Edwards seems to debate to the other candidates instead of debating to the audience. Gravel got no time, and Richardson blew his. Your mileage may vary.

Gordon June 4, 2007 - 11:48am

I thought that Edwards dominated the debate with his honesty to America lines and his non-yelling (as the other candidates were doing) tone. None of his answers were ramblings so that he could dodge a question. I also felt like he was the only one with a unique "100 days" answer that wasn't thought out as politically intelligent to what the public wants to hear. He seemed very genuine and I was impressed.
I would put Hillary in a not too far second. Instead of Obama in third, I feel that Biden showed that he has presidential potential and really shined through. He extremely well informed and it was obvious that he has been around for a while.

Lauren Molidor
Political Affairs
The Texas Blue -- Advancing Progressive Ideas

Lauren Molidor June 4, 2007 - 11:51am

It's a novel idea. I escaped the problem by not having television service. I have to get the word second hand. So I owe you a debt of gratitude.

A blog at Smirking Chimp also took note of Blustery Biden. One of his outbursts had to do with campaign finance reform with teeth. Evidently it was met with a lot of silent eye-rolling as if to say "How can a person who has been a Senator since 1972 be oblivious to the sad political realities of running a campaign?" But either Biden is fed up with those realities, or he needs to inject some vigor into a flagging campaign.

Your Edwards' clip I find interesting because I, too, have been saying the same thing. The recent Iraq hydrocarbon bill, however, establishes a $1-$2 trillion incentive for the particular choice of countries. But between usurous oil profits and anti-democratic demagoguery, there's not much room more noble causes. If we are realistic, the occupation of Iraq has been responsible for the recruitment and on-the-job training or tens of thousands of Moslem insurgents. You knew that would happen before the war started. I knew that would happen before the war started. And you can bet the administration knew it too.

On a sunnier note, I suppose even a good piece on the sun can mislead. I can imagine that a photon emitted at the center of the sun could cause a chain of absorption and re-emission events that diffuses outward until it reaches the surface of the sun. And that series of events might take a very very long time. The optical density of the sun itself would preclude the same photon from doing this. But then, photons are even more difficult to distinguish from each other than Democratic candidates. So in a practical sense it doesn't matter that much.

mtspace June 4, 2007 - 12:03pm

more difficult to to distinguish from each other than candidates from any party.

They might as well all share the same neckties and pantsuits.

I remember when the Democratic party bore a greater resemblance to the bar scene in star wars than the cups of vanilla pudding on the stage last night.

Thank to you and to all for taking time to comment.
Bob Higgins
Worldwide Sawdust

BobHiggins June 4, 2007 - 2:04pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.