Bernanke Opens the Floodgates of Money


With the recent passing of Milton Friedman, it is indeed fortuitous that Barry Rithotlz over at the Big Picture Blog has found a new source for M3. And folks, the picture ain't pretty:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

When the Federal Reserve announced they were discontinuing the M3 series there was a group of people who openly stated they were worried and/or concerned. I didn't buy into the concern, instead opting to believe the general statement from the Fed, which was "M3 isn't that important and we have other measures that are effective." (or something like that).

So, what is M3? According to my dusty and tattered copy of the Baron's Finance and Investment Handbook, 3rd edition M3 is M1 plus M2 plus time deposits over $100,000 and term repurchase agreements. Let's skip the deposits and focus on the repos.

So -- what is a repo? According to the same source, is an

"agreement between a seller and a buyer, usually of US Government Securities, whereby the seller agrees to repurchase the securities at an agreed upon price and, usually, at a stated time. Repos, also called called RPs or buybacks, are widely used both as a money market investment behicle and as in instrument of Federal Reserve Monetary Policy.

A repurchase agreement is like a short-term collateralized loan. Party A (the lender) loans party B (the borrower) money. In return, Party B gives Party A an asset (usually a short-term bond like a treasury bill). Party B has to repay the loan within a short period of time. Within the banking systems, this is usually done by the US Treasury with regional member banks.

Remember -- the US banking system is like a hub and spoke system with the Federal Reserve and US Treasury as the hub and all other banks like the spokes. According to the New York Post"

FOR the past few years the U.S. Treasury has been quietly involved in what the financial markets call "repo" agreements and this near-secret operation could explain why the nation's money supply seems to be confoundingly large.

It might also explain why Washington decided earlier this year to stop publishing M3 money supply figures, the broadest and most popular measure of money in circulation.

Repurchase agreements - or repos - have long been used by the Federal Reserve to get money quickly into the hands of financial institutions, which in turn can put the money into circulation in the form of loans.

Last Thursday [November 7, 2006], for example, the Fed executed $2.5 billion in overnight repos and $8 billion in 14-day repurchase agreements. These were reported on the financial wires.

The Treasury completed a $5.5 billion repo operation on the same day under what it calls the Term Investment Option. There was no mention of the Treasury operation on the wires. In the Fed's repo deals, the banks temporarily turn over securities to the central bank in exchange for cash.

Let's go back to the chart, especially the more wobbly line. This line shows the year-over-year change in M3. Starting in the spring of this year, the annual change in M3 has fluctuated between 8% and 10% -- the largest change in over 3 years. That's a huge change in money supply.

It is not a historically large number, however as this chart of the year over year percent change in M3 from the St. Louis Fed demonstrates.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

So -- what is happening? I'll let Barry at the Big Picture sum it up:

This is a classic case of "ignore what they are saying, because what they are doing is speaking so loud:" While the Federal Reserve has been reporting rather flat money supply growth in M2 (blue line), in reality they have been dramatically increasing the cash (red and blue line) available for speculation.

Hence, that sloshing sound you heard. They have been providing the fuel for the rally, the huge M&A activity, the explosion in derivatives -- even the eye popping Art auctions are part of the shift from cash to hard assets. It is just supply and demand -- print lots of lots of anything, and that thing becomes increasingly devalued. It works the same for cash as it did for Beanie Babies.

Its not just the increase in Money Supply that should be concerning to investors -- its the misdirection about it. If Money Supply matters so little, as Fed Chair Bernanke has been out explaining to anyone who will listen, why pray tell has the Fed been working those printing presses overtime?

Given M3 increases, its no wonder the European Central Bankers laughed at the suggestion.


Bonddad November 21, 2006 - 10:12am

Truthfully, I did not expect to find such an informative graph or lucid explanation here. I understand just enough about macroeconomics to understand why this information might cause me to worry about inflation. But I don't know enough to know whether I actually should be worried. And I wish the article were more persuasive on that point. The secrecy involved might also be a source of legitimate concern; here again, I wish I understood what might be gained by the measure. Or what might be lost if we did not understand what happened. Still, thanks for posting, most interesting.

mtspace November 21, 2006 - 4:45pm

I had linked this article in an email to a broker friend of mine who just sent back the following comment.
"I understand the liquidity is increasing. What I don't understand is the inference that this is bad. (Or, is it the Fed is not talking about it that is bad). But why does any of it have to be bad? Why not just go with it and try to put it to work for you?
Bill Gross from PIMCO has been saying rates are going nowhere above 5% in the long bond and he is the larges (most money) bond manager in the US and not just be a little. If he's right, the Fed is going to have to lower because they are way too tight and spreads are way too narrow. However, if the huge increase in liquidity is the Fed's way of easing monetary policy without lowering rates what does that imply?
What I get from this is that it appears this is a great time to be in the equity markets. And, if it is inflationary, it may not be good for long term bond investors. It might be good for foreign bond investing as a hedge against the US dollar which will decline in an inflationary environment.
If they are inferring that a recession is ahead, so what, expansion and contraction is the nature of our system.

mainsailset November 21, 2006 - 6:48pm

I was one of the people who said it was intended to conceal M3 growth. I'm not sure if I should be pleased or displeased to be right.

But I had to be right, because they need liquidity to keep this game going.

OTOH, now that Dems are in charge of the House and Senate, look for Bernanke to become a good little central banker, and start tightening. Bush is a write off.

Ian Welsh November 21, 2006 - 7:43pm

need to be looked at at what they are on their face. They are short term credit with which to buy securities and for which the securities bought are pledged as collateral.

The Fed extends repo credit to its Fed Reporting Dealers, who extend it to their customers, who may extend it in some form or other to theirs, etc.

Bonddad's chart may be used to explain the recent rise in the markets as big leveraged players got some more money to play with.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly November 22, 2006 - 8:52am

And you get figures which look similar to M3 growth. Or taxed income growth.

And you need inflation to melt the housing bubble.

-- 101 ways to avoid the subjunctive mood

Gandalf November 22, 2006 - 2:30pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.