Barack Obama: Two Time Nobelist?

You’ll no doubt recall the hue and cry when Barack Obama was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for his stand on nuclear non-proliferation and his attempts to engage the Muslim world. Both the right and left in this country had great sport at this — and here I’ll agree — premature awarding of a prize to a man with few signal accomplishments in foreign policy, apart from being “not Bush”.

Six years later and I think it’s time to give him the Prize for real this time. Think about this past year: for a man who started his administration hoping to hit singles and doubles in foreign policy (consumed as he had to be by the domestic economic crisis), he’s kind of knocked a couple out of the park, provoking admiration from aboard and from mainstream Americans, and consternation from the idiot fringe that will sit on perches and poop all day, parroting “Obama bad, BRAWK!”

In general, his foreign policy across six years has been pragmatic rather than bold: he’s taken a backseat in Syria and Libya despite being the single largest presence in either conflict. Of course, this makes the Ex-Parrots all squawk that he’s done nothing, despite the fact that America has, if not the largest, certainly a large military and diplomatic presence in both of those conflicts.

He hasn’t quite confronted Putin in Ukraine, a potential European Union and NATO member, to be sure, but then Russia has its own internal mess that prevents Putin from being as aggressive as he probably believes he can be. It’s hard to invade a neighboring nation when your own people are having a hard time buying bread because you’ve banned food imports (shades of the Soviet!) Obama really hasn’t had to take much action against Putin. You know the old saying: when your enemy is drowning, don’t throw him a life saver.

This also served to silence his squawkers….er, critics domestically, as well, all of whom marveled at the magnificence of Putin’s strong aggressive display. The traitors. The same traitors who decided to cast their lot with Netanyahu over their own President, only to have it blow up in their faces as Americans decided, “You know? Enough is enough, guys.”

The other intractable problem remains ISIS (and their sworn ally, Boko Haram), but here too, Obama has been working quietly in sync with allies in the region. It’s a muddle, to be sure, so bad that Jon Stewart has remarked that the United States is actually fighting the United States, but it’s better than our boots on the ground and gives political cover to the local nations to solve the problems that were ultimately imposed by western nations on their own terms.

Which brings me to Iran, of course.  Here, Obama has taken bold action, action that scares the living daylights out of his conured critics, so much so that they attempted to undermine any agreement with Iran (and five other nations, I want to quickly add) only to have that, too, explode in their faces like a trick cigar.

A nuclear non-proliferation treaty with a nation that is far smaller than Russia, a treaty backed by Russia and China, one that can now be implemented to if not prevent, delay development of nuclear energy by Iran until we have had a chance to incorporate them into the world at large. Think it can’t be done?

Is Iran any worse than Germany or Japan of the 1940s? Yet there we have two thriving members of the global community, trusted allies and partners.

And finally, there’s Cuba. A sixty year old Cold War ended with the last regime standing. While de facto this freeze out ended after the Elian Gonzalez fiasco (and I say “fiasco” with respect to the Cuban-American mafia that forced politicians to genuflect to their whims in order to deliver Florida’s electorate), it took an additional twenty years and a new generation of Cuban Americans to say “We’d really like to visit our relatives now.” It was inevitable. Obama did the pragmatic yet bold thing, and he did it the right way.

Going forward, we see John Kerry making overtures to the what can only laughingly be called “government” of Somalia. I anticipate next on the agenda will be the conflict in Mali (rebel forces there have aligned with Islamist extremists) and perhaps forcing Mugabe out of Zimbabwe, or at least holding his feet closer to the fire.

Obama will not be able to single-handedly in eight years create peace in the world, but the overall arc of his efforts has been towards that goal, reducing violent extremism in the world while creating economic opportunity in places it did not exist before. For instance, his advances in Africa and in South Asia will help make shipping lanes in the Indian Ocean a little safer from piracy when pirates no longer have chaotic ports to seek safe harbor in.

Despite the daily news reports, he’s been generally successful in that goal: remember, when he took office, all those extremists had two honey pots to fly to, Iraq and Afghanistan, and the terrible tolls in those nations never really entered our consciousness because we became inured to the numbers and the stories and they all blurred together. Today, the death tolls from extremists worldwide (with the exception of Syria) are down and trending down.

This 2009 Nobel Prize, possibly not his last one, may have been the most prescient pick for the Nobel committee ever.

This post was read 590 times.

About author View all posts


7 CommentsLeave a comment

      • It is piss poor grammar. A Conure is a small burrowing parrot (a noun).

        Counred appears as an attempt at making the noun into the past participle, and used as a ajective, of a non-existant verb, and tries to tie his critics into the squawk meme of the piece.

        The piece is either delightful satire, or over effusive praise. How it overlooks the continuing chaos and death caused by US foreign policy personally escapes me.

        A better construction would read : “out of his conurish critics” — which would men his critics are conure like – small, insignificant, crawl out of holes, and squawk repetitively and meaninglessly.

        • I intitially took it to be satire, but as I read on decided it was not. If it is it is very poorly done, since satire needs to reveal itself, either within the body of work or by means of punch line, and this does not.

  • “He’s taken a backseat in Syria and Libya” Yes, he “led from behind” in Libya, but nonetheless participated in bombing that nation into oblivion and created a failed state ala’ Somalia, and he has relentlessly called for regime change in both nations. I don’t think they award Nobel Peace prizes for demanding regime change.

    “He hasn’t quite confronted Putin in Ukraine, a potential European Union and NATO member” Fortunately I wasn’t drinking coffee when I read that. It was his State Department that engineered the overthrow of the elected government of Ukraine and started the whole confrontation to begin with. He has referred to Russia as “a regional power that doesn’t make anything.” It was his administration which has been threatening to move NATO into Ukraine, right on the Russian border, which is about as threatening and confrontational as you can get.

    On ISIS “Obama has been working quietly in sync with allies in the region.” Except that the Shia majority in Iraq are refusing to fight against ISIS until the US quits participating,, and US air attacks have a nasty habit of hitting refineries which belong to friends rather than to ISIS.

    On Iran, “A nuclear non-proliferation treaty with a nation that is far smaller than Russia.” Except that Iran signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty many years ago, something that our supposed ally Israel has refused to do and that Obama has never called upon them to do. No agreement has actually been reached, and the agreement that is being negotiated has nothing to do with proliferation, which would involve Iran giving nuclear material to other parties, but rather with Iran developing their own weapon which, to repeat, is not proliferation.

    “And finally, there’s Cuba.” Yes, which he did in an act of desperation to offset the fact that his administration has alienated the entirety of Central and South America and he was uninvited to the latest OAS meeting until he made friends with Cuba and was invited by Castro.

    You didn’t mention his profligate use of Hellfire missiles fired from unmanned drones in the sovereign territory of nations with which we are not at war, which is hardly what I would call Nobel Peace Prize material.

Leave a Reply