SearchUser loginNavigationTeam AgonistThoughtfulAbu Aardvark GlobalaliasBruce TimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Who's onlineThere are currently 8 users and 737 guests online.
Syndicate |
The UN in the Horn?Intense violence broke out today between Ethiopian occupiers and Somali Islamists in Mogadishu today, proving once again that our buddies the Ethiopians aren’t wanted there, and that our vicious missile strikes haven’t deterred the insurgents. Meanwhile, somewhat inconsistent reports are coming out about Ban Ki-Moon’s stance on sending in peacekeepers. Reuters (see link above) quotes him to the effect that sending in troops is not possible. IRIN emphasizes the opportunities presented by the current situation, but only mentions troop deployment as one option among several. But the BBC makes it seem as though the decision is more up for grabs:
27,000, huh Ban? Now look, I want to see stability in Somalia too. But don’t you think you should be concentrating on finding the 17,000 peacekeepers the force in Darfur is waiting for, rather than hinting at new commitments? I have qualified support for the UN, but that doesn’t mean I can’t criticize the General Secretary when he says things that simply don’t make sense. In fact, I’m going to criticize the UN hardest when they fall flat on rhetoric, because rhetoric is the main tool in their arsenal at this point. So don’t even mention troop numbers you have no hope of getting. In other Somalia-related news, the Danes are heroes.
Badass. (Cross-posted at The Seminal.) Alex Thurston March 20, 2008 - 6:40am
( categories: Africa: Sub-Saharan | Analysis )
|
![]() |