As sequestration begins, Republicans have been overtaken with something close to giddiness, and Democrats seized with gloom. It appeared as recently as a few months ago that the threat of across-the-board cuts, disproportionately hurting defense, would force Republicans to negotiate a long-term debt reduction agreement. But Republicans are happily announcing their willingness –and, in many cases, outright eagerness — to absorb a hit to spending of any kind whatsoever, and their total resistance to higher revenue in any form. And so the GOP is already celebrating its victory, even speaking of their great triumph in the past tense, as a done deal (“This was a necessary win for Republicans,” exults a GOP aide) while liberals are alreadybemoaning Obama’s miscalculation.
The great Republican budget victory may yet arrive. It certainly hasn’t happened yet, and it’s far from certain it ever will.
The first question is whether House Republicans can sustain their refusal to consider their no-revenue, no-negotiation stance. Public opinion may not be the thing that stops them. Americans oppose government spending in general and favor it in particular. An ABC poll today finds strong public support for an across-the-board cut in federal spending. That is the result you’d expect from a poll that only asks about “federal spending.”
A couple of points should be made here:
1) The general public, despite the ABC poll Chait references, hold the Republicans responsible for the sequester. (Note the source.)
2) As I’ve pointed out on a couple of occasions, the sequester could be — and probably is — a sop to the Teabaggers to shut them up now that we’ve come to brass tacks.
3) The essential point to make here is a question you should ask your conservative friends: Can you name five government programs that you like? If you can get a straight answer, you’ll find that opposition to tax hikes actually collapses once people look at the details.
But I digress. Back to the political trenches.
Weaker Boener is in a bind. You see, when he first agreed to the sequester back in 2011, he had to do yeoman work to persuade defense contractors that cuts to the DoD budget would never go through, that Republicans would find a way to exempt them.
And indeed, they tried. Indeed, Weaker Boener rolled out a small-beer budget proposal yesterday that would restore defense spending to its pre-sequester levels.
Of course, it will never pass the Senate, and may not pass the House given the intractable nature of Boener’s herded cats.
Put it this way: When Lindsey Graham is calling for tax hikes to pay for defense, you’ve got a lot of ground to catch up!
So, to sum up, the GOP have won a gift battle against the Great Muslin Overlord, and are woefully unprepared for the vultures about to pick at their bones.



Credit where credit is due.
You can’t negotiate sequestration with the GOP, persuade your political allies in the House and Senate to vote for it, and sign it into law with accolades about “reaching across the aisles,” then whine about how moldy and pus-laden is the legislative sausage you helped make and sold to the public.
The sequesters cuts provide a significant opportunity for congress members to extort “contributions” from those affected by the cuts.
No wonder the Rs are giddy. They believe they have scored a political point (being frugal), and they have the opportunity to receive even more
bribescontributions, to restore budget items selectively.Win-win I believe.
I’ve been in the habit of saying that no one I am around IRL will notice these things, but that doesn’t really describe it . Naturally they notice things that impact them materially. What makes them apprehensive/dismissive is any talk about what the events mean, any talk that tries to connect the dots.
Maybe in the process of getting browbeaten about communism or jesus all our lives people develop a distaste for thinking about meta stuff at all. Shock jocks aspire to maximum offensiveness and their lies are just a side order that goes naturally with rudeness like nachos with beer. Their goal is not to win the argument, it is to make the very prospect of public discussion so disagreeable that people just avoid it, associate it with distasteful experiences.
That’s what I think is going on around me.