Info About Safety Management In The Training Of Our Troops In Taiwan & Singapore?

Q: Info about Safety Management in the training of our troops in Taiwan & Singapore? The SQ006 crash have some how revealed the safety management of the Taiwan authority screwed up in case of incident. Main factor: The pilot and it 2 co-pilots have drove the plane into the wrong runway. No denying! But so far report from the press (not only Singapore media) including CTN, the Taiwan authority direct the blamed entirely to the pilots and not the airport authority. A simple words by the chief said that they would "examined further to see whether the controller officials are also negilance". How long it would take? Have they (Taiwan authority) analyse contributing factors? Let me briefly list out the factors: 1) Weather on that night. (THE MOST IMPT CONTRIBUTING FACTOR) 2) The so-called China Airline pilots that claim to witness the SQ plane was in the wrong runway. So with so many days have passed, no a single words that these 2 pilots have be asked for a formal investigation? 3) What the duty personnel are doing in the control tower? 4) Was the lights along the close runway on? 5) A runway that have been closed for so many year, shouldn't it not call a runway anymore? 6) Proper closure /safety procedures done on the so-call under-repair runway". 7) Conduct & personal history on the 3 SQ pilots. (To be investigate by SIA too) Any sucidal thought? Suffering any depression? 8) Proper safety management procedures carried out by the airport authority. E.g a risk assessment form correctly filled up by the pilot and the airport official. No one want this incident to happen! However, when the investigation is carried out, the committee have to be logical and unbaised on which ever sides so as to give the dead ones a fair trial. I bet you too don't want to die without knowing the cause of your departure from the earth. Next, Safety Management in Singapore. I'm not be boasting of my country organization or image. But I felt our government have done well in term of safety management to prevent any crises to happen. 1) The recent HFM widespread incident, only 1-2 days when 2 kids died in related to the dieases. A multi-ministrial commitee was formed to investigate the matter. Preventive measures like a more than 1 weeks closure of all child-care centres. The civil service have also taken the lead to ensure that parents involved would have enough time off to take care of their kids. (At that time of the incident, I was in Taiwan for an SAF oversea exercise.) Knowing the cases though hp and the ST available in camp. 2) MINDEF and SAF safety management in the training of our troops. Having about to complete my National Service in 2 months times. During this period, I'm really impressed of the SAF philosophy. Those who are vocation as driver would know that before you move out, you will need to fill out a Risk Assessment Form (liable to checking during Logistic Readiness Inspection) similar to the one fill out by the airforce pilot (not sure whether the commercial pilot have this procedure). The Cat 1 rule during the heavy downpour or high temperature, no training are to be carried out. Safety offiers and proper risk / safety procedures during training exercise even for "simple" trainings like IPPT test. The mandatory 7-hours of sleep during BMT. Mandatory water parade to be conducted before any physical (be it a minor IPPT test or SOC) exercises. Many more other proper safety management procedures. Cannot release more, later kena charge for releasing too much classified information.

A: - The weather is deem to be within limits. What is wrong with the pilot's decision to take off ? How do you explain that the CAL is also trying to take off ? - The duties also included the fact that the ATC must confirm the runway that the plane is on physically. Not just verbal confirmation from the pilots. It makes no sense to built a Tower for air traffic controllers if it is not intended for that purpose. Even a closed up room serves the purpose of the CKS air controllers All comments on whether they are closed or not comes from the Taiwan investigators. If they are not sure, who else knows ? By regulation, if pilot can not sure where he/she is at airfield, he/she can apply for ground crew guidance, that is airport will send out ground crew with car to guide an

aircraft to its right position. this is particular true when a pilot land on a airport he/she is not familiar with. Now look at What pilots of SQ006 did that night? Do they apply? NO, NO, NO! They THINK and REPORT they ARE at runway 5L. So, What CKS ATC can do? Still send out ground crew to make sure SQ006 did not screw up? Maybe you can make a suggestion to both Singapore air and CKS airport, next time, if it is singapore air want to take off or land on CKS airport, better send out ground crew not matter what SQ pilots say in radio, to monitor those SQ pilots to make sure they This is the dumbest statement in your arguments.