Fact About Sexual Harassment

Q: do agree that puritannical mores haven't helped anything here in the US. Imagine trying to impeach a President because he was gettin a little on the side (or under the desk)! Ironically, I was referring to the puritannical mores of sexual harassment legislation including one Italian Bank manager losing his job, having to pay a thousand Euro fine, AND facing some jail time for kissing a girl on the cheek in the office. You on the other hand are trying to spin Clinton's sexual harassment lawsuit and subsequent perjury as just some fun "good ol' boy" behavior. IIRC, Clinton has never been convicted of perjury. Do you have information to the contrary?

A: But that said, I believe he was fined by the judge in sexual harassment case along with losing his license to practice law in Arkansas. (No big loss for him there, granted.) A conviction is not required to remove a sitting president from office (some would even argue that the conviction has to follow the removal.) In fact, the FIRST president to be impeached (but not removed) was also accused of a crime but never charged It became a scandal because Clinton lied about it to escape the sexual harassment lawsuit. You are well aware of this and making a disingenous

argument that the republicans were charging him with the adultery rather than holding him to the same sexual harassment and perjury standards that republicans have been held to in the past and even today. What's hilarious is that the feminists totally threw away what credibility they had left after giving Clinton boy a free pass to sexually harass when they went after Arnold Schwarzenneggar a few years later. Affirmative action can only do so much to help unqualified women out of their element compete. Consequently, Mark, everyone including yourself knows the game is up. But do keep blustering until your blew in the face in an attempt to deny it though.