Definition Of Harassment

Q: Oral sex" is a kind of sex, a kind of "sexual relations". Perhaps in your own private language. In American English, "sexual relations" means coitus. Check it out in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition. In ordinary, everyday language, oral sex is not sexual relations. Most people agree that it is not. Boy, you haven't been to divorce court lately, have you?

A: You really ARE logically-impaired, aren't you? First off, my Webster's says that "coitus" is" sexual intercourse", but that doesn't mean that sexual intercourse is limited to coitis. Here's your faulty sylloGISM in a nutshell: Coitis is sexual intercourse. (Dictionary says so.) Sexual intercourse is a kind of "sexual relation". Therefore, sexual relations are limited to coitis or sexual intercourse. Secondly, the term "sexual relation" as used in the Jones case , by adding all sorts of details and qualifiers, clearly was NOT limited to a dictionary defintion of intercourse. Thirdly, Monica's deposition did NOT relay on the definition of "sexual relations" that was used at Clinton's deposition. And clinton said "Yes. Absolutely", when directly asked if there was NO SEX WHATSOEVER. Forthly, there's that matter of semen on the dress: If you look in Webster's, you'll see that "sex" is defined, in part as: "ANYTHING connected with sexual gratification or reproduction, or the urge for these.. Fifthly,

my dictionary, also Websters' doesn't define "sexual relations". Maybe yours does, based on the collegiate "survey" purporting to show that college students at some unnamed diploma mill thought eatin' ain't cheatin' In order for your theory to be correct, literally thousands of johns, prostitutes, and "unfaithful" spouses would have had to have unfairly and illegally lost money, freedom, property, marital status and custody rights of their children. YOU are clearly attempting to redefine common terms. You will fail. The fact that Clinton's argument requires him to argue that she had sex with me, but not vice versa, shows how contorted his "reading", and yours, is.