Alex Berenson and John F. Burns | Najaf | August 18
NYT – Just five days after they arrived here to take over from Army units that had encircled Najaf since an earlier confrontation in the spring, new Marine commanders decided to smash guerrillas loyal to the rebel Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr.
Acting without the approval of the Pentagon or senior Iraqi officials, the Marine officers said in recent interviews, they turned a firefight with Mr. Sadr’s forces on Thursday, Aug. 5, into a eight-day pitched battle, one fought out in deadly skirmishes in an ancient cemetery that brought them within rifle shot of the Imam Ali Mosque, Shiite Islam’s holiest shrine. Eventually, fresh Army units arrived from Baghdad and took over Marine positions near the mosque, but by then the politics of war had taken over and the American force had lost the opportunity to storm Mr. Sadr’s fighters around the mosque.
Now, what the Marines had hoped would be a quick, decisive action has bogged down into a stalemate that appears to have strengthened the hand of Mr. Sadr, whose stature rises each time he survives a confrontation with the American military. Just as seriously, it may have weakened the credibility of the interim Iraqi government of Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, showing him, many Iraqis say, to be alternately rash and indecisive, as well as ultimately beholden to American overrule on crucial military and political matters.
As a reconstruction of the battle in Najaf shows, the sequence of events was strikingly reminiscent of the battle of Falluja in April. In both cases, newly arrived Marine units immediately confronted guerrillas in firefights that quickly escalated. And in both cases, the American military failed to achieve its strategic goals, pulling back after the political costs of the confrontation rose. Falluja is now essentially off-limits to American ground troops and has become a haven for Sunni Muslim insurgents and terrorists menacing Baghdad, American commanders say.
The Najaf battle has also raised fresh questions about an age-old rivalry within the American military – between the no-holds-barred, press-ahead culture of the Marines and the slower, more reserved and often more politically cautious approach of the Army. Army-Marine tensions also have surfaced previously, notably when the Marines opened the Falluja offensive, only to be ordered to pull back.
As they replay the first days of the Najaf battle, some commanders are wondering if a more carefully planned mission would have had a better chance to succeed.
“Setting conditions for an attack requires extensive planning and preparations,” said Lt. Col. Myles Miyamasu, who commands an Army battalion that arrived to reinforce the Marine unit here two days after the fight began. “If you don’t have those things in place and you attack, a lot of times it fails.”
When the United States transferred power to the interim government in June, both American and Iraqi officials insisted that authority for major decisions on the use of force would be exercised by the new Iraqi leadership, in particular Dr. Allawi, a former enforcer for Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party who defected in the 1980′s and became leader of an exile political party. Senior United States military commanders stressed that while they retained command of their troops, the forces were there to serve the Iraqi government.
But in the battle in Najaf, at least, the marines here say they engaged Mr. Sadr’s forces at the request of the local Iraqi police. They did not seek approval from senior military commanders or from Iraqi political leaders, with the exception of the governor of Najaf. The governor, Adnan al-Zurfi, an Allawi appointee, refuses to confirm having given the green light, although American commanders in Baghdad cited his commands repeatedly as the political cover for the Marine attack.
In the last week, the interim government has twice halted major American-led attacks on Mr. Sadr’s forces as they were about to begin. It now says it will use Iraqi troops for future battles. But it is far from clear, judging from the lukewarm assessments of American commanders in Najaf, that the American-trained Iraqi units that fought alongside the Americans last week are capable of taking the lead in any showdown with Mr. Sadr.
The seeds of the Najaf battle were sown on July 31, when the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, commanded by Col. Anthony M. Haslam, replaced units of the Army’s First Armored Division and First Infantry Division, which had fought Mr. Sadr’s militiamen for weeks in the spring before a series of truces around Najaf. The marines began to skirmish with the Iraqi fighters almost as soon as they took responsibility for this holy city of 500,000, American officers and Mr. Sadr’s militiamen say.
Senior officers in Baghdad, as well White House officials who discussed the battle in Washington, say the latest fighting began when a Marine patrol drove directly past one of Mr. Sadr’s houses in Najaf – violating an informal agreement that American units would stay away from Mr. Sadr’s strongholds, treating them as part of an “exclusion zone” that was at the heart of the cease-fire in the city.
Two days later, on Aug. 5, fighters in Mr. Sadr’s Mahdi Army staged a 2 a.m. attack on a police station in Najaf. Usually, the police are an easy mark, but this time, the White House official said, “they shot back” and called for American reinforcements. When the militiamen pushed forward a third time, about 7 a.m., American commanders in Baghdad said, the governor, Mr. Zurfi, called for American reinforcements.
American intelligence officials monitoring Mr. Sadr said he then summoned reinforcements from around the country, and Ambassador John D. Negroponte, the top American official in Iraq, “decided to pursue the case,” one official said. The result was a domino effect, with the fighting in Najaf soon replicated in more than half a dozen cities and towns across southern Iraq that are Mahdi Army strongholds, including the Baghdad slum of Sadr City, Diwaniya, Kut, Al Hayy, Nasiriya, Amara and Basra.
The battle in Najaf quickly centered on a huge cemetery adjacent to the Imam Ali Shrine, which had been off limits to American troops as part of a truce worked out after earlier fighting in April. At its closest point, the L-shaped cemetery, more than five square miles of tombs and catafalques and crypts, is only a few hundred yards from the shrine. Marine commanders in Najaf acknowledge that they did little planning for the battle, but say they gambled that they could reach the walls of the Old City so fast that they would outrun the political firestorm sure to result.
“We just did it,” said Maj. David Holahan, second in command of the Marine unit in Najaf.
Inside the cemetery, the battle was exceptionally fierce, marines said. Mr. Sadr’s guerrillas had secreted away many weapons caches and explosive devices, and as the marines forced their way forward, they traded shots – and hand grenades – with insurgents who were sometimes only a few yards away.
The ferocity of the rebel resistance surprised the marines, who had seen Saddam Hussein’s army disintegrate last year as they marched north to Baghdad. “The ones we fought the other day are a hell of a lot more determined,” Lt. Scott Cuomo said.
By early evening on Aug. 5, the battalion had sent out an urgent request for reinforcements. Senior commanders sent the First Battalion of the Fifth Cavalry Regiment, a heavy Army unit, from Baghdad.
Maj. Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the First Cavalry Division commander overseeing American troops in Baghdad, said during a visit to an American base in Najaf on Sunday, Aug. 15, that the division did not know until the last minute that the 1,800 marines in Najaf might need reinforcements. The Fifth Cavalry Regiment’s tanks and other armored vehicles were patrolling in Baghdad when the request for help arrived, he said. By then, American troops in the capital were under intense pressure themselves, fighting Sadr militiamen in Sadr City and in skirmishes in other Shiite districts.
Army units began to prepare to move immediately, but the 120-mile drive from Baghdad, through some of the most rebel-infested territory in Iraq, took two days, Colonel Miyamasu said, with the forces arriving in Najaf on Saturday. By then, many marines had been fighting for almost 48 hours straight, in temperatures that topped 120 degrees each day.
Still, they had managed to press forward to the west and south, reaching the southern edge of the cemetery, just a few hundred yards from the mosque. But with the Army battalion unprepared to fight Saturday, the marines decided to retreat.
The next day, Aug. 8, the Army re-entered the cemetery. But by then, with political pressures building in Iraq and across the Muslim world, American forces faced immense pressure not to damage the Imam Ali Mosque. The Army never tried to reach the south wall of the Old City, and soldiers fighting inside the graveyard needed permission to fire heavier weapons in the direction of the mosque. The fight became a stalemate.
“If we had arrived one day earlier or the marines had attacked one day later, I’m not sure we’d be in this position,” Colonel Miyamasu said.
In Baghdad, commanders seemed curiously disconnected. On Monday, Aug. 9, a senior military official told reporters that American forces had cut off Mr. Sadr’s forces in the Old City and the cemetery from the rest of Najaf. But no cordon existed, and none would be set up until Thursday, when the second Army battalion arrived.
Marine officers have said they killed several hundred guerrillas , weakening Mr. Sadr’s forces for future fighting, at a relatively low cost in American casualties – 8 marines and soldiers killed and about 30 wounded.
“We put a major hurt on his hard-core militia members,” Major Holahan said. “Things happened pretty well from a military point of view.”
Mr. Sadr’s spokesmen have disputed the American figures for their dead, saying fewer than 30 were killed.
On Friday, the Iraqi government and Mr. Sadr’s forces reached a tentative cease-fire. Although negotiations with an Allawi government delegation from Baghdad quickly collapsed, amid new threats from Dr. Allawi and his aides of a resumed push on the mosque, Mr. Sadr appeared to have once again withstood American threats and firepower.
Iraqi officials have said the new plan is to use Iraqi units to force Mr. Sadr from the mosque, while assuring fellow Muslims, in interviews broadcast across the Arab world, that they will allow no damage to the shrine.
“I am disappointed,” Colonel Miyamasu said Friday, after the cease-fire was announced. “A target of opportunity has passed.” But he said American forces would continue to press Mr. Sadr as long as the Iraqi government wanted.
“It’s not over,” he said. “It’s just going to be different.”
Alex Berenson reported from Najaf for this article and John F. Burns from Baghdad.



“Acting without the approval”…. just like Abu Gharib huh? Now we have whole units of soldiers acting like mercenaries, with disregard to commanders, court marshal, and other. For 8 days? Yeah, right….. we got some spineless commanders out there. Perfect candidates for a future conspiracy!
very good review of the situation in Najaf , thanks , I hope you will continue posting in the future.
Iraq Prepares Assault on Najaf, Gives Rebels Hours
Wed Aug 18, 2004 08:45 AM ET
By Khaled Farhan
NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters) – Iraq’s defense minister gave Shi’ite militiamen in the holy city of Najaf hours to surrender Wednesday, warning that troops were preparing for a major assault to “teach them a lesson they will never forget.”
Explosions and gunfire echoed through the streets as U.S. forces battled Mehdi Army militiamen loyal to radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, whose two-week-old uprising poses the biggest challenge yet to Iraq’s interim government.
Sadr’s fighters are taking shelter in Najaf’s Imam Ali shrine, hoping their opponents will not dare to attack one of the holiest sites for Iraq’s majority Shi’ites, but Defense Minister Hazim al-Shaalan said an assault was imminent.
“They have a chance. In the next few hours they have to surrender themselves and their weapons,” Shaalan said in the city after meeting local officials.
“We are in the process of completing all our military preparations… We will teach them a lesson they will never forget,” he said.
American marines and soldiers have been doing most of the fighting in Najaf, but Shaalan said Iraqi forces had been training to storm the shrine complex and could complete such an operation within hours.
“It will be Iraqis who enter the shrine … there will be no American role in this, except giving air protection and protecting some roads leading to the shrine. But the entry (of the shrine) will be 100 percent Iraqi,” Shaalan told Al Arabiya, a pan-Arab television channel, in Najaf.
Interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi issued a statement accusing Sadr’s men of laying mines around the shrine.
The director of Najaf’s main hospital, Falah al-Muhana, said 29 people had been brought in killed or wounded from the clashes Wednesday, but there were no more precise figures. U.S. casualties are treated at their own bases.
Sadr’s uprising has fueled clashes in other Shi’ite cities in southern Iraq and divided a national conference in Baghdad intended to advance Iraq’s progress toward democracy.
Insurgents fired mortar rounds in Baghdad, with one landing near the conference venue Wednesday, witnesses said. Two more mortar bombs were fired near the Interior Ministry in Baghdad. No casualties were reported in either attack.
But in the northern city of Mosul, guerrillas fired a mortar bomb into a crowded market, killing five civilians and wounding 21, officials said.
NEW ASSEMBLY
The Baghdad conference was due to announce members of a new council to oversee the interim government later Wednesday, the meeting prolonged by disputes over Najaf and wrangling over the makeup of the council.
A delegation from the conference flew to Najaf Tuesday to try to broker an end to the fighting that erupted on August 5, but Sadr refused to meet them.
The Najaf uprising has exposed Iraq’s fragile security situation and the interim government’s reliance on U.S. troops, posing interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi with a major dilemma ahead of elections in January.
Allawi must be seen to resolve the challenge to his authority, but using heavy-handed tactics near Najaf’s shrines could enrage the country’s 60-percent Shi’ite majority.
U.S. officers said they had not provoked clashes during the delegation’s visit to Najaf Tuesday, saying fighters from Sadr’s Mehdi Army had attacked them first. Sadr’s fighters accuse U.S. troops of starting the fighting earlier this month.
The uprising has inflicted a heavy toll of dead and wounded among civilians.
Iraq’s health ministry said Wednesday 21 people had been killed in clashes in Baghdad, Basra, Diwaniya and Najaf and dozens wounded in the past 24 hours. Clashes continued in the Iraqi capital Wednesday.
Tensions in Najaf have sharpened divisions among the 1,300 delegates meeting in Baghdad to choose the new 100-member council, designed to act as a watchdog over the interim government.
The conference had been due to announce the membership of the council Tuesday, but was extended to a fourth day amid wrangling among delegates.
The conference, which includes religious and political leaders, is to pick 81 candidates, while the remaining 19 will come from Iraq’s now defunct governing council.
The council will be able to veto legislation with a two-thirds majority, approve the 2005 budget and appoint a new prime minister or president should either quit or die in office.
Polish troops in the southern town of Hillah came under mortar fire. A polish reporter said a Polish soldier and an American civilian appeared to have been wounded.
An editorial about this article is posted at:
http://scoop.agonist.org/comments/2004/8/20/63811/2893/33#33
Marine in Najaf responds in op-ed today’s NYT! [none / 0] Replies: 0
posted by artappraiser on 08/23/2004 11:55:31 AM EDT
attached to Fighting erupts around Najaf shrine
http://scoop.agonist.org/comments/2004/8/23/23937/9121/1#1
of a set up
When critics of the war say their advocacy is on behalf of those of us risking our lives here, it’s a type of false patriotism. I believe that when Americans say they “support our troops,” it should include supporting our mission, not just sending us care packages. They don’t have to believe in the cause as I do; but they should not denigrate it. That only aids the enemy in defeating us strategically
This is bullshit- supporting this war and the troops is not inclusive! This whole letter is pure spin and really hard to believe written on the run.
the NY guest op-eds are usually rigorously vetted as to authenticity. It may be spin, but the guy is prolly for real.
he is real, but it does make me wonder if the words are his. Remember the letter to the editor that went around to all the papers?
so he is not sitting around doing grunt work, although he prolly had some input into the whole new Najaf thing that was reported in the initial article?
So he feels he has to defend his honor…he’s a Marine after all…not gonna let that friggin’ liberal NYT smear his rep.
on if his letter is read at the GOP convention? LOL
they use it like that, the NYT will fight back.