How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash

Greg Gordon | Nov 1

McClatchy - In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers that it also was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting. Now, a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose those secret bets may have violated securities laws.

Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.

Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.

Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.

"The Securities and Exchange Commission should be very interested in any financial company that secretly decides a financial product is a loser and then goes out and actively markets that product or very similar products to unsuspecting customers without disclosing its true opinion," said Laurence Kotlikoff, a Boston University economics professor who's proposed a massive overhaul of the nation's banks. "This is fraud and should be prosecuted."


Tina November 1, 2009 - 3:04am
( categories: AgonistWire | Business | Economics: USA )

More on this story:

Story | Mortgage crisis shows why financial regulation is needed

Story | Mystery: Why did Goldman stop scrutinizing loans it bought?

Story | How Moody's sold its ratings - and sold out investors

Graphic | Goldman's revolving door with government

Video | One couple stands up to Goldman Sachs

Video | Goldman Sachs' secret bets

On the Web | See our complete Goldman report

Note: Greg Gordon was the senior reporter for McClatchy's excellent investigative series on the Bush Department of Justice scandals. He is an outstanding investigator, thorough, and persistent. McClatchy is well worth watching on this story.
Michael Collins November 1, 2009 - 4:34am

When he bought Knight-Ridder he bought the only news service which did serious, credible, and thorough reporting on the Bush administration's arguments for going to war in Iraq. Not surprisingly, their reports began to question whether this war was based on truth, since so many fabrications kept cropping up. Naturally, the rest of the news media ignored Knight-Ridder, and most of the reporting got replay outside of the US, while the US media fell into cheerleading for the war and for Bush.

There was some fear that McClatchy would either gut the investigative reporting of Knight-Ridder or tone it down, but he has done neither. It still remains the best of its breed among US news organizations.

Numerian November 1, 2009 - 8:25am

The Washington Bureau of McClatchy Newspapers is a great site in general. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/

Gordon and two other McClatchy Washington Bureau reporters got an award for the DoJ stories: http://www.mcclatchy.com/newspapers/awards/story/2128.html Here's Greg Gordon's page. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/146

I followed their DoJ coverage on the fired attorneys through their great work debunking the Republican "voter fraud" fantasy and showing it for what it was/is - voter suppression. I agreed with everything they said. It was the first an only time I saw election fraud covered by a major media group in a way that truly impressed me.

If Marisa Taylor and Margaret Talev show up with Gordon on Goldman articles on Goldman, that will be the original DoJ team. Goldman will be heavily scrutinized.

Michael Collins November 1, 2009 - 7:06pm

...The only question is; what's going to be done about it? That answer is easy; nothing. Sometimes I think stories are reported just to piss us off and show us just how powerless we really are.


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 November 1, 2009 - 7:27am

that pretty much covers it, did you see this Celcius? Hey Obama

Tina November 1, 2009 - 7:40am

...customers be? They already fleeced the entire middle class; and the rich don't need it. LOL


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 November 1, 2009 - 7:48am

LOL

Tina November 1, 2009 - 7:53am

...than we did. Nah, China makes a good target; but I doubt they're buying. They, after all, are the ones who have a firm grip on our privates, but won't squeeze too hard because their privates are connected to our privates; at least for now. But giant that they are; maybe not, for too much longer. Ouch!


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 November 1, 2009 - 8:34am

since the Brits seem more inclined to fix their banking problems they might find quite a few customers.

Tina November 1, 2009 - 10:35am

McClatchy, By Greg Gordon, November 2

SAN JOSE, CA — When California wildfires ruined their jewelry business, Tony Becker and his wife fell months behind on their mortgage payments and experienced firsthand the perils of subprime mortgages.

The couple wound up in a desperate, six-year fight to keep their modest, 1,500-square-foot San Jose home, a struggle that pushed them into bankruptcy.

The lender with whom they sparred, however, wasn't the one that had written their loans. It was an obscure subsidiary of Wall Street colossus Goldman Sachs Group.

Goldman spent years buying hundreds of thousands of subprime mortgages, many of them from some of the more unsavory lenders in the business, and packaging them into high-yield bonds. Now that the bottom has fallen out of that market, Goldman finds itself in a different role: as the big banker that takes homes away from folks such as the Beckers.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja November 2, 2009 - 9:31am

Thinking the unthinkable

...

Over the weekend, the The Huffington Post ran a McClatchy news service story about Godman Sachs's misdeeds around the issuance of mortgage backed securities. The basic idea in it was that GS was aggressively gathering trash mortgages from fly-by-night "originators" all over America to bundle into tradable security paper, which they then pawned off on feckless, inattentive investors (pension funds, foreign banks, etc) seeking miracle returns -- at the same time that GS was buying credit default swap "insurance" by the bale, knowing full well that the collateral backing their own issuance of MBS was of a quality somewhere between dead carp and dog poop. In other words, they were shoveling shit investments out of one window, and betting against the value of them from another window. Thus a picture resolves of GS's "true opinion" of the securities it paddled, and the question arises whether failure to inform the peddled of this opinion constitutes fraud. I certainly think it does.

I've been making substantially the same case in this column for two years now, so it is interesting to see the mainstream media awaken to a story-line that an ambitious nine-year-old could have pulled off the Web over recent months. I also continue to assert that a flurry of bonuses paid out this holiday season by Goldman Sachs and its other amigos at the top of the banking food chain will be greeted by violence - which will be the natural outcome of a society whose government fails to even give the appearance of protecting its citizens from organized crime. How did a sock puppet get appointed head of the US Department of Justice, folks will wonder.

How bad is the situation 'out there' really? In my view, things are veering toward such extreme desperation that the US government might fall under the sway, by extra-electoral means, of an ambitious military officer, or a group of such, sometime in the near future. I'm not promoting a coup d'etat, you understand, but I am raising it as a realistic possibility as elected officials prove utterly unwilling to cope with a mounting crisis of capital and resources. The 'corn-pone Hitler' scenario is still another possibility - Glen Beck and Sarah Palin vying for the hearts and minds of the morons who want 'to keep gubmint out of Medicare!' - but I suspect that there is a growing cadre of concerned officers around the Pentagon who will not brook that fucking nonsense for a Crystal City minute and, what's more, would be very impatient to begin correcting the many fiascos currently blowing the nation apart from within. Remember, today's US military elite is battle-hardened after eight years of war in Asia. No doubt they love their country, as Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte loved theirs. It may pain them to stand by and watch it dissolve like a castle made of sugar in a winter gale.

I raise this possibility because no one else has, and I think we ought to be aware that all kinds of strange outcomes are possible in a society under severe stress. History is a harsh mistress. For all his 'star quality' and likable personality, President Obama is increasingly perceived as impotent where the real ongoing disasters of public life are concerned, and he has made the tragic choice to appear to be hostage to the bankers who are systematically draining the life-blood from the middle class. Whatever we are seeing on the S & P ticker these days does not register the agony of ordinary people losing everything they worked for and even believed in. In a leadership vacuum, centers don't hold, things come apart, and rough beasts slouch toward Wall Street.

I did inhale.

Don November 2, 2009 - 11:37am

I find him refreshing and on target. I'm not buying the military take over notion, however. And if that were to happen, we'd regret the change. Name one nation that was subject to a military takeover and turned out better. The U.S. military officer corps is heavily Republican, 9 to 1 or so. What we'd get is more of the same and new wars. Just more self interest by the folks with the most sway.

But Kunstler's main point is totally on target. Things are simply awful. Obama is sitting in the White House doing nothing for the broad base of citizens while taking care of The Money Party. It is pointless to expect Obama to change his direction or his way of thinking and acting that drives that direction. What we see is what we've got, a president without a philosophy or a passion; just a refined version of the powers that be, there as a placeholder until it's time to "change" things again.

Strange daze in the midst of collapse.

Michael Collins November 5, 2009 - 1:01am

Its much harder to build something. BTW, its strange to find myself defending Obama when I voted for someone else. The only real accomplishment of the Bush WH was tax cuts for upper income taxpayers; if you want to call that an accomplishment. This kind of change in law was not subject to filibuster and he had a discliplined majority otherwise, legislatively, he accomplished nothing that was not propelled by 9/11.

My own feeling is that even if he had the right vision to get us out of the present mess, Obama could not get the work done needed to fulfill such a vision. The nation has become ungovernable in times of stress.

We need a NATION WIDE STRIKE for Real healthcare reform

Joaquin November 5, 2009 - 1:12am

I'm doing 'God's work'. Meet Mr Goldman Sachs

John Arlidge

Number 85 Broad Street, a dull, rust-coloured office block in lower Manhattan, doesn’t look like a place to stop and stare, and that’s just the way the people who work there like it. The men and women who arrive in the watery dawn sunshine, dressed in Wall Street black, clutching black briefcases and BlackBerrys, are very, very private. They walk quickly from their black Lincoln town cars to the lobby, past, well, nothing, really. There’s no name plate on the building, no sign on the front desk and the armed policeman stationed outside isn’t saying who works there. There’s a good reason for the secrecy. Number 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004, is where the money is. All of it.

It’s the site of the best cash-making machine that global capitalism has ever produced, and, some say, a political force more powerful than governments. The people who work behind the brass-trim glass doors make more money than some countries do. They are the rainmakers’ rainmakers, the biggest swinging dicks in the financial jungle. Their assets total $1 trillion, their annual revenues run into the tens of billions, and their profits are in the billions, which they distribute liberally among themselves. Average pay this recessionary year for the 30,000 staff is expected to be a record $700,000. Top earners will get tens of millions, several hundred thousand times more than a cleaner at the firm. When they have finished getting "filthy rich by 40", as the company saying goes, these alpha dogs don’t put their feet up. They parachute into some of the most senior political posts in the US and beyond, prompting accusations that they "rule the world". Number 85 Broad Street is the home of Goldman Sachs.

much much more, pricks

Tina November 7, 2009 - 11:54pm

'We participated in things that were clearly wrong and have reason to regret,' Lloyd Blankfein said. 'We apologise.'

The Guardian, By Graeme Wearden, November 18

The head of Goldman Sachs has apologised for the Wall Street titan's role in helping to create the financial crisis.

After being ridiculed for saying he was doing God's work, and having seen his company labelled as a bloodsucking vampire squid, Lloyd Blankfein yesterday delivered a mea culpa to a conference in New York.

"We participated in things that were clearly wrong and have reason to regret," Blankfein said. "We apologise."

As the world's most successful investment bank, Goldman was involved in many of the practices that led to the credit crunch – such as the creation of "toxic" mortgage-backed securities.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja November 22, 2009 - 10:30pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.