45 percent of world's wealth destroyed: Blackstone CEO

Megan Davies and Walden Siew | New York | Mar 10

Reuters - Private equity company Blackstone Group LP (BX.N) CEO Stephen Schwarzman said on Tuesday that up to 45 percent of the world's wealth has been destroyed by the global credit crisis.

"Between 40 and 45 percent of the world's wealth has been destroyed in little less than a year and a half," Schwarzman told an audience at the Japan Society. "This is absolutely unprecedented in our lifetime."

But the U.S. government is committed to the preservation of financial institutions, he said, and will do whatever it takes to restart the economy.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner plans to unfreeze credit markets through a new program that will combine public and private capital in a fund that would buy bank toxic assets of up to $1 trillion.

"In all likelihood, that will have the private sector buy troubled assets to clean the banks out in terms of providing leverage ... so that we can get more money back into the banking system," Schwarzman said.

He expects the private sector to end up making "some good money doing that," but added there were complex issues on how to price toxic assets.

He put part of the blame for the financial crisis to credit rating agencies.

"What's pretty clear is that, if you were looking for one culprit out of the many, many, many culprits, you have to point your finger at the rating agencies," he said.

more


tjfxh March 11, 2009 - 6:36pm

Mark-to-Market Scapegoat

Schwarzman and Blackstone are attempting to blame poor investment decisions on Mark-to-Market accounting.

I disagree.

It was the excessive leverage that destroyed Bear Stearns, Lehman, Citigroup, AIG, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, etc., not mark to market rules, evil short sellers, or hedge fund bets via Credit Default Swaps as discussed in Is Debt the Lifeblood of the Economy?

Furthermore, the only way 45% of the world's wealth could vanish in a year is if it was a mirage in the first place. That wealth was perceived, not real, and it vanished right along with a forced reduction of leverage that is still underway.

Moreover, neither leverage nor earnings are coming back anytime soon because attitudes of banks towards lending and consumers towards borrowing and spending have changed for good.

Mish

tjfxh March 11, 2009 - 7:36pm

Fed told today that Americans lost 18% of their wealth in 2008. The global figure can't be far from that.


--Sell Alaska to China!

Singular March 12, 2009 - 6:02pm
tjfxh March 11, 2009 - 10:09pm
tjfxh March 11, 2009 - 10:22pm

They were made up numbers to begin with. It never existed... It was a freaking mirage.

creativelcro March 12, 2009 - 12:14am

A Madoff victim on CNN just pointing out that, down through the years, many people have paid high taxes on their phantom earnings. They're queing up for tax reviews stating that the lack of government oversight contributed to their losses.

I must say "Madoff" is an unusually apt surname, as in "made off with your money".

Anyway, if we continue to insist on basing economic exchange on the credit standard, then I suggest we distinguish between actual real money you can physically hold in your hand, and creativelcro's mirage money which comes in the form of promises, assumptions, IOUs, accounts receivable, interest earned etc. etc. All these last amounts could be referred to as "madoffs" and hold no real value until converted to physical dollars.

See? Why don't people as me about this stuff? Anyway, gotta go. Hafta buy a lottery ticket.

Chickadee March 12, 2009 - 11:20am

No wealth has been destroyed.

Stolen maybe.

Inflated maybe.

Destroyed, no. That's just a shell game to cover the theft.

I say inflated, since the claimed size of the wealth was a lie. There never was assets of matching size underlying the numbers. So how can you say the wealth was destroyed?

Stolen, yes! People gave real assets, and in exchange are getting little or nothing back. Was it destroyed? No.

Every share sold had a buyer, if the share represented any real asset, the new holder has that asset, and the old holder has money. (Which he has doubtless spent on something else.)

What has happen has been a redistribution of wealth, not a destruction. Those who have gained, or have been incompetent over the last years are desperately trying to "spin" this as wealth destruction. This is a sleight of hand...
* Inflate (lie) about the value real assets in the game.
* Steal most of the real assets, and hide them in various corners
of the system.
* When the inflated paper assets are found to be valueless.
* Claim a mystic thing called a "stock market crash" "destroyed wealth."

But what has really happened is the real assets were stolen years ago, leaving inflated vapour. People realize the paper assets were empty years late.

But the trick has been that the theft occurred years before the market crashed.

Like deep throat said decades back... "Follow the money." Well, don't. Follow the real assets. Who is holding those real assets now? Who has been spending real assets? Start by looking hardest at those whinging loudest about "Wealth Destruction". Because they are hiding something.

John Carter March 15, 2009 - 8:47pm

So if, say, I buy some jewelery on Ebay advertised as being worth 100 bux for only 5 dollars, and if I later discover that the item is worthless, which amount did I lose? 100 dollars or 5 dollars? The answer from my viewpoint of flat earth is 5 dollars. Apparently many would not agree.

Chickadee March 20, 2009 - 2:52pm

http://agonist.org/tina/20090311/rich_list_hit_by_economic_crisis


"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you've imagined." -Henry David Thoreau

Tina March 12, 2009 - 6:04am

William D. Cohan | March 11

NYT(op-ed) -... Many smaller firms — including Evercore Partners, Greenhill and Lazard — took one look at those risky securities and decided to steer clear. When I worked at Lazard in the 1990s, people tried to convince the firm’s patriarchs — André Meyer, Michel David-Weill and Felix Rohatyn — that they must expand into riskier lines of business to keep pace with the big boys. The answer was always a firm no.

Even the venerable if obscure Brown Brothers Harriman — the private partnership where Prescott Bush, the father and grandfather of two presidents, made his fortune — has remained consistently profitable since 1818. None of these smaller firms manufactured a single mortgage-backed security — and none has taken a penny of taxpayer money during this crisis.

So enough already with the charade of Wall Street executives pretending not to know what really happened and why. They know precisely why their banks either crashed or are alive only thanks to taxpayer-provided life support. ..


I feel the American worker has been sacrificed to the capitalist idols in the ancient Mayan fashion. - Sue Lamb, NYT reader

nymole March 13, 2009 - 12:41am

Mr. Schwarzman took Blackstone public and suddenly had to use mark to market for his shareholders to get any idea how the fund was doing. Prior to that he could operate in the shadows like any other hedge fund, hide his losses for years, nurture his gains quietly until he was ready to sell his holdings, pretend all his revenue was really interest income deserving of a 15% tax rate, and leverage himself 30:1 or higher.

Maybe the world lost 45% of their wealth in one year, but Blackstone shareholders lost around 90%. By this standard, Mr. Schwarzman is one of the most incompetent managers of his time. Wouldn't he just love to hide his incompetence? Abandon mark to market and he could do just that.

Numerian March 14, 2009 - 9:37am

of course in the guise of just reporting on it

Thoughts on Walking Away From Your Home Loan

NYT -
...
YOUR CREDIT A short sale, deed in lieu or foreclosure itself will almost certainly damage your credit report and score, and the black mark will last for up to seven years. But the amount of damage it does will depend on how much other credit trouble you’ve gotten yourself into with other lenders.

Todd J. Zywicki, a law professor at George Mason University, predicted that FICO may have to adjust its credit scores to lessen the impact of a foreclosure or similar incident. “It just seems obvious that a foreclosure in 2008 or 2009 doesn’t have as much information value as a foreclosure five years ago,” he said. “To the extent that foreclosure doesn’t predict future behavior as much as it did in the past, you’d expect that the FICO algorithm would change to adjust for that.”

Craig Watts, a spokesman for FICO, said that was an interesting idea. “We try not to get involved too much in psychobabble around what is and isn’t predictive,” he said. “If the numbers show that foreclosure is less predictive, then we’ll take it into account in future redevelopments of the formula.” That would take a minimum of two to three years, though.

Some lenders aren’t waiting that long to initiate their own foreclosure destigmatization programs. The Golden 1, one of the nation’s largest credit unions, now has a mortgage repair loan for people who have lost a home to foreclosure but want to buy a new one.

It’s hard to imagine that there won’t be a parade of insurance companies, credit card issuers and mortgage lenders in Golden 1’s wake, even though Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may be unwilling to guarantee the mortgages of such borrowers for several years. In fact, Aaron Bresko, the vice president of lending for BECU, another large credit union based in Washington State, is putting together a panel called “How to Lend to the Newly Credit Impaired” for a conference later this year.

“Good people have bad things happen to them, so how do you find those people and reach out to them?” he said. “As the year progresses, it’s going to be an emerging market.” more -
I feel the American worker has been sacrificed to the capitalist idols in the ancient Mayan fashion. - Sue Lamb, NYT reader

nymole March 14, 2009 - 6:39pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.