Obama's atomic umbrella: U.S. nuclear strike if Iran nukes Israel

Aluf Benn | Jerusalem | December 11

Ha'aretz - U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's administration will offer Israel a "nuclear umbrella" against the threat of a nuclear attack by Iran, a well-placed American source said earlier this week. The source, who is close to the new administration, said the U.S. will declare that an attack on Israel by Tehran would result in a devastating U.S. nuclear response against Iran.

But America's nuclear guarantee to Israel could also be interpreted as a sign the U.S. believes Iran will eventually acquire nuclear arms.
Secretary of state-designate Hillary Clinton had raised the idea of a nuclear guarantee to Israel during her campaign for the Democratic Party's nomination for the presidency. During a debate with Obama in April, Clinton said that Israel and Arab countries must be given "deterrent backing." She added, "Iran must know that an attack on Israel will draw a massive response."

Clinton also proposed that the American nuclear umbrella be extended to other countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, if they agree to relinquish their own nuclear ambitions.

According to the same source, the nuclear guarantee would be backed by a new and improved Israeli anti-ballistic missile system. The Bush administration took the first step by deploying an early-warning radar system in the Negev, which hones the ability to detect Iranian ballistic missiles.

Obama said this week that he would negotiate with Iran and would offer economic incentives for Tehran to relinquish its nuclear program. He warned that if Iran refused the deal, he would act to intensify sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Granting Israel a nuclear guarantee essentially suggests the U.S. is willing to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. For its part, Israel opposes any such development and similar opposition was voiced by officials in the outgoing Bush administration.

"What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?" asked a senior Israeli security source. "What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is nuclear-capable?"

The same source noted that the fact that there is talk about the possibility of a nuclear Iran undermines efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring such arms.

A senior Bush administration source said that the proposal for an American nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility. "Who will convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a nuclear war because Haifa was bombed? And what is the point of an American response, after Israel's cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?"


Brian Downing December 11, 2008 - 4:15am
( categories: Miscellany | News )

countries should Israel nuke them?

Jeff Wegerson December 11, 2008 - 10:43am

already has 4 votes. Now it just needs another 1300 to make the top ten. Of course by that time it will need more.

Net neutrality has moved from 20 to 11 over the last 24 hours.

http://change.gov/page/content/openforquestions

Jeff Wegerson December 11, 2008 - 10:54am

"We'll bomb Israel, if Israel bombs Iran" or more generally "We'll bomb any nation that nukes another , and then we'll nuke ourselves just to equalize the moral fallout."

Pretty scarey stuff......



Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole December 11, 2008 - 2:59pm

What if Israel provokes Iran (not too hard to imagine) and Iran nukes them? It is not in our national interest to be doing this.

creativelcro December 11, 2008 - 12:51pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.