Clark ousted as New Zealanders opt for change

Peter Lewis | Nov 8

ABC news.au -
New Zealanders have voted for change in Saturday's general election sweeping aside the three-term government of Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark in favour of a new conservative coalition led by the National Party.

The swing to the right, that was forecast in all the pre-election polling, was apparent as soon as counting got underway.

The centre right National Party, led by John Key, finished with 45 per cent of the vote compared with Labour's 33 per cent. That translates into 59 seats in a 122-seat parliament, where it will head up a coalition including the right wing ACT and United Future parties and possibly even the Maori Party.

A short time ago, Miss Clark conceded defeat and stepped down as leader of New Zealand's Labour Party.
 

All takes on the overlooked NZ election contest welcome - any kiwi Agonists especially ~ Editors


Tina November 8, 2008 - 6:05am
( categories: News | Oceania )

though from the Telegraph, these profiles do have decent background for NZ-political newbies like me

New Zealand election: the vanquished Helen Clark
The Telegraph - Now the Gladiator in the form of John Key, leader of the Centre-Right National party, has put Boadicea to the sword - by persuading voters to end nine years in power by Helen Clark, the Labour Party leader.

Miss Clark, New Zealand's first elected woman prime minister, is at 58 a battle-hardened warrior whose early political skills were forged fighting old-fashioned mysoginists to claw her way to the top of the Labour party.

Mr Key, younger at 47, with a fresh-faced charm and unshakeable confidence, had overtaken her in public popularity before ousting her in the most important poll of all.

It was the first time that Miss Clark's political dexterity, combined with her remarkable instinct for survival and passion for what she believes in, had failed her since she first burst on to New Zealand's political stage.

more at the link

New Zealand election: the victorious John Key

The Telegraph - Mr Key's greatest weakness may also have proved his greatest strength. A 47-year-old political novice with no experience of government, he is the antithesis of Miss Clark, one of New Zealand's longest-serving politicians.

His opponents tried to argue that an international economic crisis was the worst time to hand power to an untested beginner, who had been an opposition MP for only six years and leader of the National Party for the past two. Yet to many voters he is the fresh face of change, unencumbered by the political baggage of history.

He has likened himself to Barack Obama, an analogy that drew mirth in Wellington but which was, perhaps, not lost on an electorate with an appetite for change after nine years of Labour rule.

Voters also like the fact that he rose to become a multi-millionaire investment banker from a childhood on the breadline. He grew up in a single-parent family, living in a council house, but on taking office he will become New Zealand's richest ever Prime Minister, with a personal fortune estimated at NZ$50 million (£19 million).
more at the link


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole November 8, 2008 - 10:51am

My sister, who lives on the south island, mentioned one time that Clarke was a controlling person.

Synoia November 8, 2008 - 11:42am

From Times Online
November 8, 2008

New Zealanders chose a multimillionaire former foreign currency trader Saturday to lead them through the global financial meltdown, handing long-serving left-wing Prime Minister Helen Clark a crushing election defeat.

John Key’s conservative National Party easily won power in New Zelaland, known internationally for its pristine environment and as the backdrop to the “Lord of the Rings" movies.

“Today, New Zealand has spoken, in their hundreds of thousands, and they have voted for change,” Key told supporters at a victory celebration in Auckland.

snip

He is expected to inplement tax cuts and extra spending to help cushion an economy already in recession and has promised more right-leaning government than Clark’s, which for almost a decade made global warming a key policy issue and led international condemnation of scientific whaling.

In a country where the environment is a mainstream political issue, Key has said he would scale back Clark’s greenhouse gas emission trading scheme to protect businesses from financial losses, and reduce red tape that he says will entangle infrastructure projects, such as dams, because of environmental concerns.

Key will not need the support of the indigenous Maori Party, which won five seats but said he would reach out to them anyway and seek their support in Parliament.

Foreign affairs and trade policies are unlikely to change under Key, including the long-standing ban on nuclear-powered ships entering New Zealand ports which has rankled the US.

New Zealand’s small number of troops doing reconstruction work in Afghanistan will remain. New Zealand has no troops in Iraq.

Tina November 8, 2008 - 3:40pm

Clark saying "no" to Bush while the Australians-in-charge were
saying yes- on Iraq, on ripping up the Kyoto treaty.

Norwegians are fond of saying that people just get tired of a political party and need a change every so often- I guess we'll see on this one, with Australia now Labour.

Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole November 8, 2008 - 9:46pm

If you are lurking, it would be interesting to hear your views on the
election.

Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole November 8, 2008 - 10:16pm

a kiwi living in Indonesia?

Tina November 9, 2008 - 1:28am

from wherever you are?...

Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole November 9, 2008 - 8:28am

as for the last year or three the commercial media (Radio / Newspapers) seems to served up an unending stream of whinges against Clark.

Now with the global financial crisis, Kiwi's are wanting somebody who promises them tax cuts and money. (Even if they basically stealing from their childrens future.)

It is one of the contradictions of a "Labour" party. The main criteria on which they are judged is unemployment. Which means they must keep business happy.

So curiously enough South Africa has had, thanks to Cosatu activism, even before the "official" end of apartheid, labour law which is actually ahead of "Labour" led NZ!

The difference in policy between a "red" Labour Party government and a "blue" National Government is about that. A difference in colour, and matters of degree, rather than principle.

So what's to choose between them? It comes down to who most effectively convinces the voters that they will put most cash in your pocket. Even if its a rob peter to pay paul, steal from old ladies type accounting that they are doing behind the scenes.

Policies seem to be finely tuned to gather, what the parties judge, will gather them the most votes, rather than based on strong principles or ideals.

I'll give an example.

I invite you to go off and read the history of Ahmed Zaoui...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Zaoui

The only difference between Labour and National on this case was Labour was content to let the labyrinth of laws, using secret "hearsay" evidence from international spy agencies, wind to a conclusion of deporting him back to Algeria.

National took the opportunity to whinge that this process was too long and expensive, and he should have been deported forth with.

Now National is in power, do I expect them to change those laws. No. Do I expect such a case to be handle differently? No.

So why do I care?

Because the difference between Ahmed Zaoui and myself is...
* I have a letter of reference from a police force that murdered thousands,
* Ahmed Zaoui is a democratically elected representative.

The only party to take a principled stand on the issue were the Greens. The rest were self serving and short sighted, with an ear for xenophobic "dog whistle" politics, rather than caring that Justice or even better, mercy be served.

So no, I'm not surprised.

Having abandon principle as a guiding light, Labour has chosen to fight the election over tax cuts and hand outs.

It is no surprise then that the beneficiary bashing right won that fight.

John Carter November 9, 2008 - 3:57am

TVNZ - Unions do not see any hope of closing New Zealand's wage gap with Australia under a National government.

The national secretary of the National Distribution Union, and former Alliance MP, Laila Harre is not impressed with National's tax plans.

She says they do not help the lowest paid workers. And Harre says the test of John Key's rhetoric of inclusiveness will be if he goes down the tried and true National track of attacking the unions - or whether he is prepared to work with them in fixing low wage problems.

continued at link



Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole November 9, 2008 - 11:46pm

Terrible title but long, thorough piece of crystal ball gazing

Gordon Campbell | November 14

Scoop - The premise of Labour’s election campaign was that John Key was either (a) a vacuum waiting to be filled by political expedience or (b) a secret hardliner masking his real intentions until he could gain power.

Both ways, the assumption was that something akin to an anti-government, free market agenda would be enacted, probably on terms hatched by National in collusion with the Act Party and its friends in business. Whatever, voters slept on through the alarm.

The more likely and more interesting prospect is that Key – like his mentor David Cameron in the UK – will be seeking a fresh formula for conservatism in order to re-install National as the natural party of government. To achieve that, the narrow Reaganite agendas of Rodney Hide and his friends will have to be sidelined, or only spasmodically affirmed. Therein lies the basic similarity between Helen Clark and John Key –both came to lead their respective parties in order to direct them away from failed hard right agendas, and both seem to instinctively recognise that laissez faire policies are too socially divisive to be politically sustainable.

For solutions, both Clark and Key turned to UK models for inspiration. Clark’s initial response was to draw on Tony Blair’s “Third Way” model, whereby the Clark government used the state to minimize the social impact of the economic framework that she inherited, and largely retained. Key is drawing upon Cameron to do much the same thing – to embrace the notion of the activist state, and to use Big Government openly to achieve the broadest possible consensus for the conservative enterprise. The irony being, if Key is to succeed, the social outcomes themselves will need to have quite a lot in common with Clark’s vision. Only if Key fails will New Zealand look like a world devised by Rodney Hide - with greater extremes of wealth and poverty, and ever increasing and ever costlier crime and imprisonment rates. That’s not an option for Key morally, or politically.
more at the link



Yes, I can come up with a post-election signature, just... not... yet...

nymole November 13, 2008 - 11:51pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.