Senate Passes Economic Stimulus Bill

Jonathan Weisman | Washington | February 7

WaPo - The Senate today added payments for seniors and disabled veterans to an economic stimulus package approved by the House that would send checks to most American families, then overwhelmingly approved the $151 billion shot in the arm to the U.S. economy, 81-16.

The House is scheduled to give final approval to the legislation tonight and send the plan to President Bush for his signature, ensuring that checks will begin reaching families by mid-May.

read more after the jump

The legislation would provide $600 payments for individuals -- $1,200 for couples -- plus $300 for each child under 17. It would begin to phase out eligibility at $75,000 in adjusted gross income for individuals and $150,000 for couples. Workers who can show $3,000 in earned income last year--not enough to pay taxes--would be eligible for payments of $300.

Businesses also would be given generous incentives to invest in new plants and equipment. The Federal Housing Administration and the federally-backed mortgage consolidators Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be allowed to insure larger home mortgages.

On a 91-6 vote, the Senate added a provision granting $300 checks to seniors, disabled veterans and veterans' widows who can show $3,000 in Social Security or veterans' disability benefits last year. Senators also tightened rules to prevent illegal immigrants from claiming payments. In all, the tax checks will cost the Treasury $105.7 billion, all of it added to the budget deficit.

Senate Democrats had wanted a considerably larger package that included an extension of unemployment insurance, billions of dollars in energy tax credits and federally backed bonds for home construction. The Senate plan also would have ensured that poor seniors, veterans and workers who earn too little to pay income tax would have received $500 checks, the same amount that would have gone to working individuals. And it would have doubled eligibility thresholds, to $150,000 in income for individuals and $300,000 for couples.

But when a filibuster of that plan survived by a single vote, House Democratic leaders publicly pressured their Senate colleagues to scale back their ambitions and move fast.

more at link


Tina February 7, 2008 - 8:30pm

assholes

Tina February 7, 2008 - 8:33pm

so that's why. of course, nobody should really get checks since the government is broke; what's even worse, when folks default on their mortgages, the government could be out almost a trillion! ouch!

I think the stimulus was rushed to to help the banks get bad mortgages off their books as soon as possible!

mrmx February 8, 2008 - 12:20am

That's the real issue, isn't it? If it's intended to maximize economic stimulus, then it should be targeted to the folks you know will spend it right away-- which is the working poor, the unemployed, low income retirees, Food Stamps recipients, etc. If you hand it out predominantly to folks who can afford to sock it away for a rainy day, and they see a bunch of rain on the horizon, it's foreseeable that they are going to save it instead of spend it. They will surely get around to spending it sooner or later, but the moment for it to help reduce the harshness of the recession may already have passed by then.

If the gubmint sees it as their duty to give the private economy a shot in the arm at taxpayer expense, then in the interest of the greater good they should subordinate their philosophical objections to redistribution of wealth and do it in the most effective way possible.

Otherwise it's more of a bribe to voters from incumbent office holders than it is genuine fiscal stimulus. Heyyy... what is it these folks are up to, anyway?!

chalo February 8, 2008 - 4:50am

a Presidential "signing Statement" that will say the moron-in-the-middle will ignore the law and fuck us all...

-5.75,-4.05
"We're all fucked. It helps to remember that." --George Carlin

justadood February 7, 2008 - 9:47pm

"In all, the tax checks will cost the Treasury $105.7 billion, all of it added to the budget deficit."

I'm really glad someone pointed out that this is all borrowed money which will simply be added to the federal deficit, and eventually to the federal debt. Although I don't understand the claim that this will only cost the treasury $105.7 billion, when the total bill is $151 billion, but maybe I'm missing some details. In any case, the long-term cost to the taxpayers will be the total cost of the program plus the interest paid in the long-term to finance it. So in the long run it will cost the taxpayers about $300 billion, give or take a few billion. Or am I missing something?

"The big print giveth, but the small print taketh away." -- Tom Waits

jonbrown February 8, 2008 - 1:48am

As mrmx pointed out in another thread, the stimulus package also includes an increase in the mortgage loan limits for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The limit, which was previously $417,000, will now be $730,000, essentially allowing them to bail out investors and banks that hold or are liable for the bad debt. While supporting current real estate values may be helpful to the economy (and it will infuse more money into the economy by increasing the availability of credit), this could lead to a $1T bailout in the future, since they have been taking on too many low-documentation and subprime loans.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/03/IN8LUO095.DTL

phaneron February 8, 2008 - 2:36am

That's a huge jump in the limit.

creativelcro February 8, 2008 - 11:31am

Yes, and it probably matches the values of homes that were purchased recently in the inflated market and will be having their interest rates reset soon.

phaneron February 8, 2008 - 6:36pm

Bush Signs Economic Stimulus Package

* AP
* Wednesday February 13 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush signed legislation on Wednesday to send $300 to $1,200 rebate checks to millions of Americans as a ``booster shot'' for the economy.

Rebates are to go out beginning in May to taxpayers and low-income people, including seniors living off of Social Security and veterans who depend on disability checks. Businesses would get tax breaks for investing in new plants and equipment.

``I know a lot of Americans are concerned about our economic future,'' Bush said. ``Our overall economy has grown for six straight years, but that growth has clearly slowed.''

Several dozen members of Congress, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, stood on the stage behind Bush as he signed a bill to fend off a possible recession. He said the stimulus package was achieved after he talked with leaders of Congress in January about ``whether or not we could come together to provide a booster shot for our economy - a package that is robust, temporary, and puts money back into the hands of American workers and businesses.''

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples from the Internal Revenue Service, with an additional $300 per child. People earning at least $3,000 and those who owe little or no taxes would get $300 for singles, $600 for couples. Those making more than $75,000 and couples with income exceeding $150,000 are to get smaller rebates - $50 less per $1,000 they make over those thresholds.

``Americans struggling with the high cost of energy, groceries and health care will soon receive relief, and our economy will get a timely, targeted, and temporary boost - thanks to our bipartisan stimulus package,'' Pelosi said. ``This package gets money into the hands of Americans struggling to make ends meet, helps families with children, cuts taxes for small businesses that will create new jobs and stimulates our slowing economy.''

Economic analysts generally believe the $168 billion package Bush signed will help prevent the current downturn from ballooning into a crisis. But if the rebates don't spur a consumer spending spree strong enough to cure what ails the economy, Congress is ready to throw more money at the problem. Bush said the measure was ``large enough to have an impact.''

more

Tina February 13, 2008 - 5:45pm

Governors Hope for Federal Cash

* AP
* Monday February 25 2008

By ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Governors are debating priorities if Congress takes up a second stimulus package, with some state leaders pushing for federal money to repair roads, water systems and bridges.

Governors hoped to raise the issue of infrastructure on Monday with President Bush at the White House.

``There are a lot of projects in every state where the architectural design has been done, where literally they're ready to tap into the ground and begin construction,'' said Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania.

Rendell and a bipartisan group of governors are pushing public works as part of a potential second stimulus package. Democrat Eliot Spitzer of New York and Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger of California are among the governors demanding federal action.

``We owe it to the people of America to join together and rebuild our country,'' Schwarzenegger said.

Bush this month signed an economic stimulus package to send $300 to $1,200 rebate checks to millions of Americans and to offer tax incentives to businesses. He opposed including infrastructure projects because ``it's not really a stimulative way to get the economy going,'' White House press secretary Dana Perino said Monday.

Asked how Bush views the governors' push for infrastructure projects, Perino said: ``Outside of the stimulus package, if they have other ideas, I'm sure he'll be willing to listen to them.''

more

Tina February 25, 2008 - 12:42pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.