UEA scientists report shock climb in CO2

Tara Greaves | October 23

Eastern Daily Press - Homeowners are being encouraged to use energy more efficiently as Norfolk scientists reveal the level of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is rising 35pc faster than expected.

At the start of energy efficiency week, a team of UEA scientists last night published a report concluding that inefficiency in the use of fossil fuels increased levels of CO2, widely agreed to be one of the main causes of climate change, by 17pc.

The other 18pc came from the decline in the efficiency of natural land and ocean sinks which soak up CO2 from the atmosphere - a problem highlighted in another piece of UEA research, as reported in yesterday's EDP.

** Leaked documents detail strategy for climate change U-turn
[...]

"We found that nearly half of the decline in the efficiency of the ocean CO2 sink is due to the intensification of the winds in the Southern Ocean."

The findings are published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The study also states that global CO2 emissions were up to 9.9bn tons of carbon in 2006, 35pc above emissions in 1990 (used as a reference year in the Kyoto Protocol).

===

Oceans losing ability to absorb carbon

Agençe France-Presse, October 23

PARIS: The world's oceans may be losing their ability to soak up extra CO2 from the atmosphere, with the potential to exacerbate global warming, say new studies.

Absorption of atmospheric CO2 by the North Atlantic plunged by half between the mid-1990s and the period from 2002 to 2005, British researchers say in the November Journal of Geophysical Research.

The data comes from sensors lowered by a container ship carrying bananas, which makes a round trip from the West Indies to Britain every month. It has generated more than 90,000 measurements of ocean CO2.

The discovery touches on a key aspect of the global warming question, because for decades the ocean has been acting as a buffer, absorbing much of the CO2 released into the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels. If the sea performs less well as a carbon sponge, or "sink" according to the technical jargon, more CO2 will remain in the atmosphere, thus accelerating the greenhouse effect.

Ute Schuster, who led the research with Professor Andrew Watson of the University of East Anglia's School of Environmental Sciences, admitted she was astonished by the data.

"Such large changes are a tremendous surprise. We expected that the uptake would change only slowly because of the ocean's great mass," she said.

Research last year pointed to rising acidification of the oceans as a result of CO2 uptake, highlighting the risk of carbon saturation as well as a looming peril for biodiversity.

Schuster was cautious about drawing too swift a conclusion from the new research, however...

===

Global Carbon Project Press Release: Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks

This study finds that the recent swift increase in atmospheric CO2 is due to faster economic growth coupled with a halt in carbon intensity reductions, in addition to natural sinks removing a smaller proportion of emissions from the air. Efficiency of natural sinks to remove emissions from human activities has been declining for 50 years.

While rising anthropogenic emissions due to increased economic growth have been established as the driver of accelerated atmospheric CO2 this study shows that both the slow down of natural sinks and the halt to improvements in carbon intensity are contributing more than one third of the increase

===

University of East Anglia Press Release: North Atlantic slows on the uptake of CO2

Further evidence for the decline of the oceans' historical role as an important sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide is supplied by new research by environmental scientists from the University of East Anglia.

October 22

Since the industrial revolution, much of the CO2 we have released into the atmosphere has been taken up by the world’s oceans which act as a strong ‘sink’ for the emissions.

This has slowed climate change. Without this uptake, CO2 levels would have risen much faster and the climate would be warming more rapidly.

A paper in the Journal of Geophysical Research by Dr Ute Schuster and Professor Andrew Watson of UEA’s School of Environmental Sciences again raises concerns that the oceans might be slowing their uptake of CO2.

Results of their decade-long study in the North Atlantic show that the uptake in this ocean, which is the most intense sink for atmospheric CO2, slowed down dramatically between the mid-nineties and the early 2000s.

A slowdown in the sink in the Southern Ocean has already been inferred, but the change in the North Atlantic is greater and more sudden, and could be responsible for a substantial proportion of the observed weakening.

The observations were made from merchant ships equipped with automatic instruments for measuring carbon dioxide in the water. Much of the data has come from a container ship carrying bananas from the West Indies to the UK, making a round-trip of the Atlantic every month. The MV Santa Maria, chartered by Geest, has generated more than 90,000 measurements of CO2 in the past few years.

The results show that the uptake by the North Atlantic halved between the mid-90s, when data was first gathered, and 2002-05.

“Such large changes are a tremendous surprise. We expected that the uptake would change only slowly because of the ocean’s great mass,” said Dr Schuster.

“We are cautious about attributing this exclusively to human-caused climate change because this uptake has never been measured before, so we have no baseline to compare our results to. Perhaps the ocean uptake is subject to natural ups and downs and it will recover again.”

But the direction of the change was worrying, she added, and there were some grounds for believing that a ‘saturation’ of the ocean sink would start to occur.

“The speed and size of the change show that we cannot take for granted the ocean sink for the carbon dioxide. Perhaps this is partly a natural oscillation or perhaps it is a response to the recent rapid climate warming. In either case we now know that the sink can change quickly and we need to continue to monitor the ocean uptake,” said Prof Watson.

===

University of East Anglia Press Release: Downturn in carbon efficiency fuels CO2 increase

A team of scientists from the University of East Anglia, the Global Carbon Project and the British Antarctic Survey have found that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) growth has increased 35 per cent faster than expected since 2000.

October 23

Published this week in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the study found that inefficiency in the use of fossil fuels increased levels of CO2 by 17 percent, while the other 18 percent came from the decline in the efficiency of natural land and ocean sinks which soak up CO2 from the atmosphere.

The research by the shows that improvements in the carbon intensity of the global economy have stalled since 2000 after improving for 30 years, leading to the unexpected growth of atmospheric CO2.

The study also states that global CO2 emissions were up to 9.9 billion tons of carbon in 2006, 35 percent above emissions in 1990 (used as a reference year in the Kyoto Protocol).

Author Dr Corinne Le Quéré of the University of East Anglia and British Antarctic Survey said: “The decline in global sink efficiency suggests stabilisation of atmospheric CO2 is even more difficult to achieve than previously thought. We found that nearly half of the decline in the efficiency of the ocean CO2 sink is due to the intensification of the winds in the Southern Ocean”.

The study’s lead author, Dr Pep Canadell, executive director of the Global Carbon Project, said: “In addition to the growth of global population and wealth, we now know that significant contributions to the growth of atmospheric CO2 arise from the slow-down of natural sinks and the halt to improvements in the carbon intensity of wealth production.”

The authors analysed atmospheric CO2 observations and CO2 emissions data since 1959 and compared observed and projected trends.

Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks by Josep Canadell, Corinne Le Quéré, Michael Raupach, Christopher Field, Erik Buitenhuis, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Conway, Nathan Gillett, RA Houghton and Gregg Marland is published on Monday October 22 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.


Raja October 23, 2007 - 7:39am
( categories: News | Environment )

The Independent, By Steve Connor, October 23

A dramatic decline in the ability of the Earth to soak up man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, and a corresponding acceleration in the rate of increase of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, have been detected for the first time by scientists.

The discovery that more carbon dioxide from human activities is lingering in the air rather being absorbed by the world's forests and oceans has alarmed scientists who believe that it signals a potentially dangerous turn of events for the global climate.

They fear that a much-anticipated "feedback" in the global climate – when increases in carbon dioxide in the air trigger further increases in atmospheric concentrations of the gas – has already begun to occur decades before many predicted.

"We always said that these feedbacks would happen in the future, but what this study shows is that these feedbacks are happening right now," said Josep Canadell, executive director of the Global Climate Project in Canberra, and the lead author of the study.

[...]

"This is incredibly important. It is bad news because we can't do much about these natural carbon sinks, but the good news is that we can increase the efficiency of fossil fuel use. I would say this is a wake-up call. Things are happening much faster than we expected," Dr Le Quéré said.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 23, 2007 - 8:28am

· Global warming 'will come sooner and be stronger'
· Chinese growth and loss of natural 'sinks' highlighted

The Guardian, David Adam, October 23

Scientists warned last night that global warming will be "stronger than expected and sooner than expected", after a new analysis showed carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere much faster than predicted.

Experts said that the rise was down to soaring economic development in China, and a reduction in the amount of carbon pollution soaked up by the world's land and oceans. It also means human emissions will have to be cut more sharply than predicted to avoid the likely effects.

Corinne Le Quere, a climate expert at the University of East Anglia and British Antarctic Survey, who helped conduct the study, said: "It's bad news because the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide has accelerated since 2000 in a way we did not expect. My biggest worry is people are discouraged by this and do nothing. I hope political leaders will act on this, because we need to do something fast."

The study worsens even the gloomy predictions of this year's report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The IPCC, which shared the Nobel peace prize this month with Al Gore, said there were only eight years left to prevent the worst effects of global warming, by acting to curb emissions.

Dr Le Quere said: "We are emitting far more than anticipated when the IPCC scenarios were drawn up in the late 1990s." Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel burning has risen by an average 2.9% each year since 2000. During the 1990s the annual rise was 0.7%.

The new study explains abnormally high carbon dioxide measurements highlighted by the Guardian in January. At the time, scientists were puzzled why dozens of measuring stations across the world were showing a CO2 spike for 2006, the fourth year in the last five to show a sharp increase in the greenhouse gas.

[...]

The new study, published in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), says three processes have contributed to this increase: growth in the world economy, heavy use of coal in China, and a weakening of natural "sinks" - forests, seas and soils that absorb carbon.

[...]

Scientists assume about half of human carbon emissions are reabsorbed into the environment, but computer models predict increased temperatures will reduce this effect. The PNAS report is the most convincing evidence so far that the global sinks have weakened over the last 50 years, though the large natural variations in carbon exchange between the earth and the atmosphere mean the team can be only 89% certain they have found an effect, short of the usual 95% confidence required to publish scientific findings.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 23, 2007 - 8:35am

Leaked documents detail strategy for climate change U-turn

The Guardian, By John Vidal, October 23

Ministers are planning a U-turn on Britain's pledges to combat climate change that "effectively abolishes" its targets to rapidly expand the use of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power.

Leaked documents seen by the Guardian show that Gordon Brown will be advised today that the target Tony Blair signed up to this year for 20% of all European energy to come from renewable sources by 2020 is expensive and faces "severe practical difficulties".

According to the papers, John Hutton, the secretary of state for business, will tell Mr Brown that Britain should work with Poland and other governments sceptical about climate change to "help persuade" German chancellor Angela Merkel and others to set lower renewable targets, before binding commitments are framed in December.

It admits that allowing member states to fall short of their renewable targets will be "very hard to negotiate ... and will be very controversial". "The commission, some member states and the European parliament will not want the target to be diluted, though others may be allies for a change," says a draft copy of Mr Hutton's Energy Policy Presentation to the Prime Minister, marked "restricted - policy".

The revelations came as scientists announced that carbon emissions were accumulating in the atmosphere far more quickly than predicted. The sharp increase found by the Global Carbon Project is attributed mainly to Chinese coal-burning and a weakening of the ability of oceans and forests to soak up carbon dioxide.

[...]

Analysis by Mr Hutton's department suggests it could cost the UK £4bn a year to achieve a 9% share of renewable energy by 2020.

The shift in stance is due to be discussed at full cabinet next week. Last night a spokesman for the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform said: "We don't comment on ministerial meetings with the PM."


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 23, 2007 - 8:38am

Comment is Free, By John Vidal, October 23

Britain wants to pretend it is leading the global debate about climate change, but its attitude towards renewable energy shows a reluctance to act.

Way back in March, Tony Blair committed Britain to a 20% European renewables target by 2020 and Gordon Brown tellingly said nothing. With the leaking yesterday of papers to be presented to him today by the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (DBerr), we now see why.

It's an open secret in government that Gordon Brown does not get climate change, let alone the need for renewables, and the leaked papers reflect the change of emphasis at the top. Climate change was Tony Blair's big thing, and Gordon was happy enough to let him drum up the idea that Britain was a climate change leader on the world stage, so long as he went nowhere near Mr Brown and the national stage.

To a few powerful people with Gordon Brown's ear in the Treasury and DBerr, renewables are still an expensive distraction. They need a lot of money spent up front on research and development, they take up lot of space, need subsidies, and they don't work if the wind is not blowing. There is no questioning the reality or science of climate change, but for these people, the best way for Britain to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is by trading them with others. Under Gordon Brown, Britain came up with the emissions trading scheme and sold it to Europe.

On a theoretical level, it makes perfect sense. There is no cost to government, any polluting emissions are effectively exported, little needs to change domestically and the City can make a lot of money by becoming the carbon trading capital of the world. Indeed, the most telling arguments in the leaked papers was that if Britain met its renewables target, it would threaten the trading scheme so dear to Gordon Brown and the Treasury's heart.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 23, 2007 - 8:46am

The Guardian, By David Gow, October 22

Brussels - A row among European governments has forced the EU to postpone ambitious plans for tackling climate change before a crucial UN conference on the issue in Bali in early December.

It has emerged that the European Commission, due to announce on December 5 its proposals on how to cut CO2 emissions by 20% and use renewables for 20% of its energy consumption by 2020, has put off the plans until the new year.

The UN conference, from December 3 to 14, will try to draw up plans for the post-2012 phase of the Kyoto protocol to cut global greenhouse gas emissions.

The EU, self-styled leader in the battle against global warming, has put forward proposals for the UN to adopt a goal of a 30% cut in emissions by 2020 but has been riven by arguments among its members over the role of trading mechanisms for promoting the use of renewables to reach that target and the EUs's own target of a 20% cut.

The decision to postpone the plans comes before a vote by MEPs this week over the commission's plans to force manufacturers to cut CO2 emissions from new cars.


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 23, 2007 - 8:42am

BBCNews, October 24

Global temperatures predicted for the coming centuries could trigger a mass extinction, UK scientists have warned.

The temperatures are within the range of greenhouse phases early in the Earth's history when up to 95% of plants and animals died out, they say.

Experts examined the link between climate and diversity over 520 million years, almost the entire fossil record.

They found that global diversity is high during cool (icehouse) periods and low during warm (greenhouse) phases.

"Our results provide the first clear evidence that global climate may explain substantial variation in the fossil record in a simple and consistent manner," said Dr Peter Mayhew of the University of York.

"If our results hold for current warming, the magnitude of which is comparable with the long-term fluctuations in the Earth's climate, they suggest that extinctions will increase."

[...]

"We could - at worst - be experiencing that in the next century - only a few human generations down the line," Dr Mayhew told BBC News.

"We need to know why temperatures and extinctions are linked in this way."


"Vanity, Vanity, all is Vanity."

Raja October 24, 2007 - 7:50am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.