Rebuild or retreat: US debates evacuation of Gulf coastline

October 11 | Washington | Ewen MacAskill

The Guardian - The United States is working on a multi-billion-dollar plan to depopulate vast swaths of coastline along the Gulf of Mexico in a move which it is hoped would help re-establish a natural barrier against the catastrophic flooding caused by the likes of Hurricane Katrina.

In the first sign that the federal government is favouring a retreat from the coast rather than rebuilding, the Army Corps of Engineers is to present to Congress a radical plan which includes rebuilding the wetlands that have been disappearing at an ever-accelerating rate in recent years.

The Corps, the engineers responsible for protecting the coastline, has been working on the plan since Katrina struck in August 2005. President George Bush promised after the floods to rebuild New Orleans and other Gulf communities.

But federal agencies and environmentalists have concluded that climate change has increased the threat of further devastation and continued rebuilding makes no sense. To be included in the overall plan is $40bn (£20bn) to be spent on the Mississippi coast. Part of this would be for a voluntary buyout of 17,000 houses in Mississippi, particularly in Bay St Louis, east of New Orleans. The corps is likely to extend the plan to New Orleans and Louisiana.

Susan Rees, project director, said: "The whole concept of trying to remove people and properties from the coast is very, very challenging. The desire to live by the water is strong."

===

See also: Climate Change and Sea Level (Other maps here).


Raja October 11, 2007 - 7:53am

BushCo and croonies may well be in denial, the Corps of Engineers is not comprised mostly of incompetents and the higher echelons of the corp know for sure that nature can be contained at a small scale for a short time; they also know that in the longrun it's a futile exercise.
Of course the waterfront properties owners and the aspiring ones are going to be frustrated, but then again if they build theyr domains and dwelling right on the coast, they destroy the only efficient line of defence that the shoreline has against the oceans.
So the only logical and politico-environmentally correct thing to do is to barr any developpement on these coasts.

Jelco Cathlon October 11, 2007 - 8:15am

... is the offshore destruction. Natch.

ww October 11, 2007 - 8:21am

...is the smart play for the Republicans - then, over time, if they message intelligently Katrina will take on overtones of inevitability sparked by climate change, rather than the story of human incompetence it was.

"Ambiguously loose statements on the one hand, and euphemisms that link terrorism and fascism to Islam on the other, have created confusion and resentment on all sides." ~ Fariborz Mokhtari

JustPlainDave October 11, 2007 - 9:14am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.