Police to use terror laws on Heathrow climate protesters

John Vidal & Helen Pidd | August 11

BBC - Government has encouraged use of stop and search and detention without charge

(Ian - read the list at the bottom. England has gutted civil rights pretty damn badly when you can hold a person for a month without charging them. That month will include, odds-on, being raped, amongst other things. A month and being buggered, and never get charged with a crime.)

Armed police will use anti-terrorism powers to "deal robustly" with climate change protesters at Heathrow next week, as confrontations threaten to bring major delays to the already overstretched airport.

Up to 1,800 extra officers will be drafted in to prevent an estimated 1,500 people disrupting the airport over the period of the camp for climate change, which is due to begin on Tuesday. The police have been told to use stop and search powers against the protesters, who have pledged to take direct action on August 18 and 19 but not to endanger life.(list of police powers after the jump)

The Metropolitan police chief, Sir Ian Blair, has said he fears a minority of protesters intent on breaking the law could cause massive disruption as Heathrow prepares for its busiest week of the year. Yesterday Met commander Jo Kaye, in charge of the specialist firearms unit, said some people would "want to get their message across using criminal means".

Scotland Yard's plans for handling the protests are revealed in a document seen by the Guardian, which was produced by Met commander Peter Broadhurst during a legal hearing at the high court which imposed restrictions on a number of named campaigners.

"Should individuals or small groups seek to take action outside of lawful protest they will be dealt with robustly using terrorism powers. This is because the presence of large numbers of protesters at or near the airport will reduce our ability to proactively counter the terrorist act [threat]," the document says.

The police report makes it clear that the government has encouraged police forces to make greater use of terrorism powers "especially the use of stop and search powers under s44 Terrorism Act 2000".

The law gives police powers to:

· Stop and search people and vehicles for anything that could be used in connection with terrorism

· Search people even if they do not have evidence to suspect them

· Hold people for up to a month without charge

· Search homes and remove protesters' outer clothes, such as hats, shoes and coats.

more at link


Tina August 11, 2007 - 6:02pm
( categories: News | United Kingdom )

It now seems that protesters who are trying to save the world are terrorists.
A few bad apples don't make the whole crate bad.
You will always get rotten apples in every demonstration. But don't paint them all bad.
Our freedom is disappearing and the governments are supporting this cause.
Bush started this and everyone else is following it in "goose steps".

repressive governments mix administrative clumsiness & inefficiency with authoritarian tendencies.

kimmy August 11, 2007 - 7:18pm

Their objective where to destroy the "west" and it's liberties.
So far I think it's a pretty clear victory for the terrorists.
Read the "news"; if your not convinced.

Jelco Cathlon August 12, 2007 - 4:59am

This is a classic example of how any power you give the police will be used in any situation in which it is usefull to them, even if it falls far outside the spirit of what the legislation was intended for. Stop and searches under the anti-terrorism act increaced from around 2000 in June to 10000 in July, one of whome was a friend of mine searched for the crime of using public transport while foreign looking. Introducing a small chance of being stop and searched each time you take the tube will not do anything to prevent terrorism. If you wanted to transport terrorist materials you would take a taxi and if you were intent on blowing up a train in a suicide bombing then a minimal chance of getting stopped and forced to detonate prematurely is probably not going to deter you. This use of stop and search will definitely increace resentment against the state in populations that percive themselves as being targeted. Combined with the war on drugs it will result in many otherwise law abiding young peoples lives being blighted with a criminal record preventing access into many professions not to mention the United States.

Psylo August 12, 2007 - 3:15pm

That is the saying, isn't it? Or is the one that we need, "quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

NateTG August 13, 2007 - 9:00am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.